|
Fox Nation is their community blog site. Fox is evil, but they're not stupid.
|
#
¿
May 10, 2012 00:16
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 05:33 |
|
|
mintskoal posted:On the other hand, Rush said "We've arrived at a point where the President of the United States is going to lead a war on traditional marriage" on his radio show today. His radio show isn't on Fox, and he knows he can get away with saying almost anything after surviving the birth control fiasco. I'm not saying that was a good headline, I'm just saying be accurate with your accusations otherwise you lose credibility to people on the fence.
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2012 00:30
|
|
|
Jayisspecial posted:If Obama had come out as a show of support in NC, not only would the amendment have still passed, but it would look like he was on the wrong side of the people. The GOP would have had a field day lambasting him as a loser on the issue. How could that have ever been a net gain? "Oh no, Obama would look bad if he endorsed basic human rights!  " You do realize that that is what your argument boils down to, correct?
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2012 01:51
|
|
|
Call me naive and idealist all you want, but timing your announcement about supporting basic human rights for maximum political impact is disgusting. A minor nuanced policy issue? Sure, go ahead and play your support for maximum timing. An issue where tons of people are having their rights violated daily? gently caress no, you need to throw your support behind it ASAP.
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2012 03:30
|
|
|
Yes they can? They just have to have a different estimation of how it would affect his campaign than his campaign team does.
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2012 04:14
|
|
|
killer_app posted:Most of this comment is so ludicrous, unrealistic, hyperbole-filled, and laughable it sounds like the kind of YouTube comment that usually follows "flying death robots" with "Building 7!" Are you saying drones are a thing that doesn't exist?
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2012 05:18
|
|
|
Yeah, an historic moment is correct. Also, thank god, that's another dumb talking point the anti crowd just lost.
|
|
#
¿
May 19, 2012 23:07
|
|
|
Specifically, Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon on February 12, 2004 in San Fran, which was later voided. Oregon also issued licenses that were later voided before Massachusetts. Mass just had the first ones to stick.
|
|
#
¿
May 20, 2012 01:22
|
|
|
Power dynamics. It's extremely easy for a family member, especially an older one, to pressure someone into something like that.
|
|
#
¿
May 30, 2012 10:17
|
|
|
My friend's moms were interviewed for this article on the Michigan delay, as they were planning on getting married yesterday. Her mom Beth's quote sums the whole loving thing up perfectly.quote:"I'm not going to another state to get married," says Bashert. "It's Michigan's job. It's my home, it's their job to give my rights and responsibilities."
|
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2013 15:38
|
|
|
Spiffster posted:According to NPR, apparently Michigan married same sex couples that have applied for name changes are being turned away until it's determined if their marriages will be upheld... How the hell can they stop someone from changing their name My friend's adoptive moms were one of the lucky couples to get married, and one of them got their last name changed to the other's 20 years ago. It's so stupid that they're denying the name change over this when they've issued name changes to unmarried lesbian couples in the past.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2014 02:00
|
|
|
Hey, don't be so quick to forget the Midwest.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 21, 2014 20:06
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 05:33 |
|
|
Nth Doctor posted:The sixth circuit has. Oh, right. I forgot about you guys since I'm in seventh and my friend's moms in MI were one of the lucky couples to get married during the short window. Keep up the good fight though! Us states slightly to your west are cheering for you!
|
|
#
¿
Oct 22, 2014 00:11
|
|
