Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Snow Halation
Dec 29, 2008

UltimoDragonQuest posted:

...Also there's going to be a second marriage referendum (1192) in Washington that we need to vote No on because it's easy to abuse the process and confuse voters.

Could they legally keep this off the ballot by saying it's redundant? Also, looking at that list, we need a referendum to stop Tim Eyman from proposing referendums.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Snow Halation
Dec 29, 2008

seiferguy posted:

Washington State map for Ref. 74 is crazy. All but one county surrounding Puget Sound (Skagit the lone alternative, and it was only within 1 percent) voted in favor of it, but the rest of the state, and overwhelmingly Eastern Washington voted against it. Adams County was 73% against it :wtc:

Skagit is pretty rural, and it has a lot of Evangelicals and Hispanic Catholics. I'm surprised how close the vote was, actually. (+1 from me in Skagit, btw)

  • Locked thread