Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape
I struggle a bit with young Frankenstein but I can tell it's quality, but a different type of cinima than I am used to

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape
In Kung Fu Hustle when the beast is being freed, there are frogs/toads around the asylum in the background

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape
I'm not sure if this counts but

The Mummy's screen writer directed GI:Joe

Gi Joe has Frasier, imhoptep and the dude with the fez in it

Clearly a case of Holly wood nepotism

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape

Eh! Frank posted:

Fixed. Both movies were directed by Stephen Sommers

Ahh, well there you go

Still, I just happened to watch both movies one after the other and it was a welcome "suprise"?

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape

BioEnchanted posted:

I loved cabinet of dr caligari, couldn't get along with casablanca.

I had the opposite experience, how interesting

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape
I really don't like black adder

Like, I can see the jokes, I can see the humor and talent and the all star cast in their prime. But dang it just don't make me laugh.

A bit of get and Laurie though, and I'm in stitches

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape

Kanine posted:

its a video game not a movie but like

i love that the gnome in left 4 dead 2 is named "gnome chomsky"

Currently playing the outer wilds and it does this thing where the elements of the theme song are spread out between different characters in different locales/planets.

So when you walk past one npc they are playing a simple banjo tune, or a flute, or some bongos

And your player character has a device that can hear across the expanses(it is set in a small scale solar system) between the NPCs.

Given that the game is in space and does its best to model orbits and gravity, occasionally NPCs are in line with each other and you get to hear the full theme song by virtue of orbital mechanics, it sort of fades in and out in this really poignant way

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape
Update

I finished the outer wilds

The whole game is moment after moment of good game design and the ending was amazing

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape
In S T A L K E R by tarkovsky

Around 50:05
https://youtu.be/Kgocncu6MBw

I implore you to look at the clip before despoilering,


in there is this scene that tracks up to a busted car, and peers through the window, frames the characters. But there is a bit of rubble that looks a bit like a gun, The whole thing has a mood of distrustworthyness and it sorta comes out of nowhere and makes you think there is an armed character stalking them.


It just caught me off guard and I was suckered into the movie

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape

Pissed Ape Sexist posted:

Dude that is not rubble and you're absolutely supposed to notice it. I can't tell if you're being sarcastic but it's the entire point of the shot


Well aware it's the point, and that, visually it's about as blunt as a sledgehammer. but that the entire thing is communicated visually, and that I could probably show someone on the street and them not "get it". But it's totally and undeniably there makes it a favourite moment

ElBrak posted:

Ya, it's a German MG-34, which as a Russian movie company you probably could get cheap as props by digging them up out of the ground. :v:

I meant rubble in the sense that it isn't a manned machine gun and for intents and purposes it might aswell be a pipe that was dug up, and that I may or may not have seen it in a less than optimal quality first time round

Jestery has a new favorite as of 22:44 on Sep 13, 2019

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape

Krispy Wafer posted:

Wasn’t there a body next to the machine gun so it’s technically manned?

The YouTube copy is only subtitled in Spanish so I can follow the action at a preschool level at best.

I thiiiink it's either a ghillie suited human figure or some rubble trash stuff in a very human shape

There is an English subbed version on YouTube somewhere

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape

jazzyjay posted:



If you're talking about this dolly zoom through the body of a burnt out car, you appear to have missed that the grass is rustling the whole time at the bottom of the screen indicating this is actually a POV of someone STALKERING them. If your copy was low enough quality that you didnt see this then get a DVD or BluRay rip post haste cause you is missin out.

Just the whole thing is what I'm referring too.

The whole scene is full visual language and tone to unsettle and make the viewer uncomfortable

That there is such a lot to unpack, but that it is all exactly there is sort of the grand idea I am pointing at.

It's.very much baby's first artful movie shot, but I stand by it it being a cool and memorable one

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape

rydiafan posted:

The L is always pronounced in the English word for one who stalks.

Like, I don't know if I'm missing a joke or you just pronounce words weirdly.

Edit: I suppose I could understand if you rhyme it with Hawker. Converting the L to a W I can get, depending on accent, but not dropping it entirely.

With my English accent I pronounce it more like "store-kerr" I can definitely see a viable bread of it being "stoll-kar"

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape

Cleretic posted:

Well how do you pronounce it?

"Sword"

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape
Yes

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape
Hard ticket to Hawaii


The whole movie is a brilliant exercise in good-bad cinema

Buuuuuuut
A. The intro credit sequence is very very good, with it being a box factory/postage center with the credits appearing very organically in the scene

B.One of the climactic scenes where the female protagonist is having to assemble a spear gun in a closet while the wounded antagonist is breaking through a flimsy door.

It is weirdly suspenseful and engaging,


These two :discourse: moments have no place in a film where a blow up doll is blown out of the sky with a rocket launcher

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape
I watched Kung pow last night


That movie has no subtle moments

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape
John wick one is a very solid revenge flick

John wick two and three is just and excuse to do action porn

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape
Oh I forgot to mention,

This isn't exactly subtle, but more just fun interpretation

John Wick uses sign language a little in the second film

I use (my country's) sign language in my day job and I can say with some degree of authority that Keanu signs and woodenly as he acts

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape

Zwille posted:

The deaf assassin (wasn’t she supposed to be deaf?) signs just as woodenly though, as always when a hearing character plays a deaf one. If anything Reeve‘s acting is more realistic because Wick actually is hearing. (This should go in the pet peeves thread: any show/movie where they have hearing people play deaf people. It always looks like poo poo)

Speaking of deaf assassins the claw Hammer Lady and karambit guy in the raid two are a very cool couple signing characters

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape
I watched Yojimbo the other day

You all should watch it

Just a great film

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape
I read there is ana interpretation that the protagonist is better viewed as a wandering spirit, obviously nothing explicit in the text but it's a cool position

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape

Baron von Eevl posted:

What about the interpretation that the protagonist is actually 30 years old. It's subtle, but if you can decipher the clues it's all there.

In truth, it's closer to 40

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape
I'm on a tarkovksy kick atm

Just finished off Solaris and that movie is so dang it's own thing either you could fit half the move in a post here with cool little catches, or it's all super meant to be here

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape
I really enjoyed the naturalistic acting and directing

There are a few moments in tarkovksy's films where the actor accidentally drops or fumble with something, that the camera keeps going while it's being sorted really adds to a sense of verisimilitude

This whole sequence with the railcar is great
(33:00)
https://youtu.be/Kgocncu6MBw

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape
Speaking of weird action movies based on children's toy franchises

The hi Joe film is bad, but the action is choreographed so as to look like a child is playing with toys

The way keeps flip over, jets just pull 180° turns and shoot down missiles

The movie just didn't go far enough

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape

Snowglobe of Doom posted:

movies based on Monopoly, Clue, Beyblade, Furby and Play-Doh, plus many many more
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_based_on_Hasbro_properties



The versions of these in my head will only lead me to disappointment

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape
As a mid twenties Aussie , I wasn't aware of rampage was an I'm untill this thread

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape

Humphreys posted:

The baked in subtitles are coloured to indicate the characters intentions/feelings towards the situation. I'm terrible at explaining it but red for menace etc.

Also this is cheating:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrVbCKtWG6U

The baked in subtitles are different in different languages (obviously) but it is interesting to have such clear difference in international versions

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape
Hey my dudes, I saw cool as ice and did an effort post

You must get be interested

https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3913164&pagenumber=1&perpage=40

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape
Putting my effort post from CD here because people may appreciate it

Jestery posted:

I recently watched Vanilla ice's "Cool as ice" and was pleasently suprised by the camera work and general vibe the film had going on. Far from being a slapped together star vehicle , it is plain to see that effort and talent went into the creation of this film. This juxtaposition between incredibley competent camerawork and staging and vanilla ice's "b-kool" attitude is an enjoyable one.

This film almost sort of works at times as a samurai ronin type film transplanted into the 90s with hyper colour motorcycles

I wonder why that is...

oh....


so enjoy some kool moments from the movie that I scrubbed







I havn't got inline linking to gifs sorted yet so you may need to click through i'm sorry, but I implore you to see some of these

This guy is strangely well characterised as a slobby sadistic mob goon
https://gfycat.com/sandyfoolhardyicelandgull

https://i.imgur.com/8cl178e.mp4

https://i.imgur.com/Mm85vpf.mp4

The lighting and relative long shot nature of this (there is a significantly more before and after this clip) and the motorcycle mount is actually kinda cool(?)
https://i.imgur.com/X9k4W3S.mp4

https://imgur.com/Af6vRx7

Ice's friends are goofy enough to be entertaining and their sequences are surreal enough to break up the pace
https://i.imgur.com/8jdGY74.mp4

This is a scene where a sister realises here brother isnt where he should be, she comes home and the NES is on but he isnt there, the slow nature of it , the environmental story telling and how the moment of realisation is dont with the drop of some papers is really good ( and in a movie with vanilla ice)
https://i.imgur.com/uzXx7St.mp4

https://i.imgur.com/roSLZHb.mp4

https://i.imgur.com/jsjTi1l.mp4

I included this one because of how it sets the scene and afte the inital set up creates negative space that is then filled with diagetic light to both secondarily establish that
a. the child is here
b.the dude is a wanker and shines light in a childs face
https://i.imgur.com/fztJtf1.mp4

so, films that have one good element or suprised you inspite of themselves thread here I guess?

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape
Baby driver was a good(?) film but not as good as it could have been from the elevator pitch

I was disappointed but it was ok

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape

Ugly In The Morning posted:

This sounds like a waking nightmare and I have never wanted to see a movie so bad in my life.

Waking nightmare?

Mate that was Johnson and friends

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape
It bored me so much

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape

dirksteadfast posted:

Maybe not the most subtle moment, but Jurassic Park just has a ton of great little metaphors hiding in plain sight, like John Hammond introducing himself to Grant and Sattler by preemptively celebrating while ignoring that he’s making a huge mess of the real science right outside the door.

That same Niel has two female ends of the seatbelt on the chopper ride over and then types them together is pretty pointed when you think about it

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape

DrBouvenstein posted:

Before they decided to do the Infinity War storyline, I was under the impression the Tesserect was originally going to be the Cosmic Cube, not one of the Infinity Stones/container for said stone.

It could have been ,It's not exactly specific what it is other than power cube

The formulaic nature of marvel films wouldn't surprise me if they have internal terms for things such as "interest point" or "tension string" for things like that so they don't get specific and can rename things

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape

Rupert Buttermilk posted:

Apparently, it must be drank (drunk?) with food.

That's at least what Aykroyd said when he was signing bottles in the liquor store in my hometown when he came to visit (this was 2007). I got him to sign a bottle, and my GB DVD.

The next day, he also visited the technical school I was just about to graduate from, and actually remembered me from the day before.

The man is Ray Stantz, though. We were teleconferencing with another campus all the way on the other side of the country, and we were all doing a Q&A sort of thing. Someone brought up aliens, and he ranted for about 20 minutes, which used up most of the time we had.

I didn't get to ask him about GB3 :argh:

Drank - recent time can remember exactly
Drunk - general past tense , no specific temporal space

Same for swam vs swum

There are exceptions to this but that's the general rule

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape

I got this confused and checked it up

I'm an interpreter by trade so this less autistic than it appears.

"To have" in this context conjures the past perfect tense implying specific knowledge of the temporal nature of the activity of

"I have run the marathon this morning"
Vs
"I ran the marathon some time ago"

"Yes I have eaten the Danish"
Vs
"I ate the Danish sometime ago"

"I caught the bus on Wednesday"
Vs
"I catched the bus to school when I was a student"

As I said it's not an exact science, and I deffo got it wrong up there. But that is the general jist of the "to have" and "run ran" . English is messy and I wanted to avoid getting into deep tense talk cos it sucks


Content tax:

I have been on a Jackie Chan marathon lately

And I've noticed an interesting commonality in his films

Often during a tense scene he will carry some object between scenes, like a broken vase or paper, it's surprisingly effective at maintains tension and gives energy to the next fight scene something to start from

Jestery has a new favorite as of 10:24 on May 15, 2020

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape

Ghost Leviathan posted:

One of the many insane things about English is that the only consistent rules it does have (Mainly related to sentence structure and adjective order) are ones that its speakers are not consciously taught and are not aware of at all.

This is definitely the bane of having listen to people talk all day and do the interpreter thing.
You definitely hear these mistakes and it's very

" You are doing it wrong " :c00lbutt:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jestery
Aug 2, 2016


Not a Dickman, just a shape

Rupert Buttermilk posted:

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/adjectives-order

The order of adjectives, and how most people intrinsically know it, is fascinating.

My L2 has virtually no adjective hierarchy and the subject can be anywhere in that mess of adjectives. When I get home after work it takes a few minutes to speak properly and I find myself struggling while drunk with the varied structures

Jestery has a new favorite as of 12:55 on May 15, 2020

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply