|
I don't know. The second post on Red Cafe is this http://www.redcafe.net/f7/e-petition-release-govt-hillsborough-files-337931/ Maybe two posters on the first page not 100% behind the Hillsborough victims families but overwhelmingly posters are.
|
# ¿ Sep 26, 2012 18:07 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 07:48 |
|
Brown Moses posted:My regular contributor has put together this piece which gives you a good idea of how many Labour politicians were targeted by News Corp, and the offices they held
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2012 12:44 |
|
What's the significance of this speech on Osbourne's in December?
|
# ¿ Oct 31, 2012 13:13 |
|
In what possible way would this be legislation by the back door? Surely legislation written and debated in Parliament is the very definition of the front door.
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2013 12:54 |
|
Pasco posted:Breaking News quote:The five defendants argued that the accessing of voicemails through hacking, after they had been listened to by the intended recipient, was not an offence under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000. Uh.... what?
|
# ¿ Jun 28, 2013 12:00 |
|
Does this mean that Brooks and Coulson have admitted to doing this (hacking voice mails after the messages were listened to)?
|
# ¿ Jun 28, 2013 12:19 |
|
What exactly were the previous reporting restrictions on?
|
# ¿ Jun 28, 2013 16:16 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 07:48 |
|
If they'd won the appeal would the restrictions have been reported then? Obviously I am very ignorant, I had thought reporting restrictions only applied to jury cases to prevent the juries being prejudiced.
|
# ¿ Jun 28, 2013 16:29 |