|
Yet.
|
#
¿
Sep 20, 2012 11:11
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 10:09 |
|
|
Seriously BM, I hope all you put on that application form for the BBC was "I am Brown Moses" since you're doing a bangup job.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2012 11:33
|
|
|
Brown Moses posted:A Greater London Assembly spokesperson said: "At no point during these meetings or conversations did the mayor discuss Operation Weeting [Police investigation into phone hacking]." No? Really? No one could possibly be so stupid as to say this.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2012 21:24
|
|
|
The gently caress!? How on earth are they justifying that?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2012 21:38
|
|
|
Does anyone know who wins the "called it!" stakes if it comes out cameron/brooks had an affair? I think I said something in the original thread but I cant remember - someone else might have done that when we were throwing out "This poo poo could go anywhere, even <xyz>" scenarios.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 4, 2012 01:50
|
|
|
Just when I think that irony has died, theres another idiot who comes along to prove me wrong.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 7, 2012 13:38
|
|
|
Did the BBC get back to you about that scheme BM?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 17, 2012 19:12
|
|
|
Brown Moses posted:Everyone has plead not guilty, so full trials, the lot. Hopefully there won't be loads of reporting restrictions. I wonder what their game plan is since the deck seems so stacked against them.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2013 11:53
|
|
|
Is Coulson still working for Cameron in downing street?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2013 16:26
|
|
|
Since were on the subject: http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/south-yorkshire-police-wanted-spend-5749493 quote:South Yorkshire police chiefs wanted to use funds donated in memory of Hillsborough disaster victims to pay for breaks in the sun for their officers, it has emerged.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 19, 2013 15:14
|
|
|
Brown Moses posted:As far as I'm aware their only asking for copies of private Eye near the court to be taken off sale. Its at Southwark, right? I wont be able to pick up a copy of the Eye when I head into uni then. 
|
|
#
¿
Oct 29, 2013 17:39
|
|
|
ewe2 posted:I have no idea how the defence plans to counter this tidal wave of evidence, because it stretches deniability to a snapping point. Man, you should have watched the original leveson inquiry testimony. "I do not/can not recall (exactly)" was said so many times the participants might as well have had it on a tape recorder in their pocket so they didnt wear their vocal cords out.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 30, 2013 21:46
|
|
|
Brown Moses posted:Due to contempt laws I'm not sure..... [edit] actually, I won't say that. Since youre now pretty internet-famous, have any of your critics brought up something youve posted on SA as ammunition?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 31, 2013 09:59
|
|
|
Im pretty sure we speculated on a brooks/coulson affair in the original thread. Does anyone remember who called it? EDIT: My mistake, I called a Brooks - Cameron affair. Heres hoping 
Plasmafountain fucked around with this message at 16:06 on Oct 31, 2013 |
|
#
¿
Oct 31, 2013 16:03
|
|
|
Have they brought up brooks husbands clumsy attempt at destroying that file yet?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 4, 2013 13:25
|
|
|
Darth Walrus posted:He actually addressed that counterargument by pointing to the Sonia Sutcliffe case, which demonstrates (as he says) how even relatively poor people can successfully go after newspapers by invoking legal aid for a meritorious claim. I don't know how readily available that is, though, or what the criteria are for getting it. Has everyone forgotten the legal aid cuts?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 4, 2013 14:19
|
|
|
Are the names tippexed out particularly juicy ones or are they names of people that have already reached a settlement with the paper?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 12, 2013 19:35
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 10:09 |
|
|
They've been a shower of bastards before so why expect them to change?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 1, 2014 10:50
|
|