|
Brown Moses posted:From Peter Jukes Liar, liar pants on fire... Boom, done
|
#
¿
May 19, 2014 11:15
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 20:08 |
|
|
Brown Moses posted:Southwark Crown Court, but it's likely they'll be summing up by next week, so it won't be so exciting. Summing up is the best part!
|
|
#
¿
May 19, 2014 11:24
|
|
|
Brown Moses posted:Southwark Crown Court, but it's likely they'll be summing up by next week, so it won't be so exciting. Are you sure? There is nothing on the listings.
|
|
#
¿
May 19, 2014 11:32
|
|
|
Brown Moses posted:Back to summing up, Peter Jukes is Tweeting it. Could be there's no court listings for next week because it might be done by then. Very bad luck for Coulson and co Goodman appeared after all of them, not before as planned. Even look at today's listings I can see anything, does the case have a combined reference? If not no biggie, there are other things to waste my time on. Edit: I knew you were talking bollocks Brown! It's on at the old bailey not Southwark! I can never trust you again. Wait until I tell everyone on Twitter, this is the final piece of the puzzle to expose you as the CIA/FBI plant we have always suspected you of being! ! notaspy fucked around with this message at 16:36 on May 19, 2014 |
|
#
¿
May 19, 2014 16:14
|
|
|
AVeryLargeRadish posted:They are powerful people, and the powerful go unpunished in the UK just like everywhere else. Justice is a pretty word used to get people to die for the powerful in wars and such, it's not something to be used on the powerful, just by them. Did you see how pisspoor the case against her, her husband and her pa was? If I was of a conspiratorial mind I would make with interest that all the evidence available pointed to the more politically damaging person while saving the chosen one. This is why we need an organisation that can investigate the rich and powerful in secrecy. As soon as NI saw this coming they deleted everything, truly does government need to be moving at the speed of business.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 26, 2014 07:54
|
|
|
Plavski posted:"I have an old fashioned view about innocent until proven guilty. But if it turns out I've been lied to, that would be a moment for a profound apology," Cameron told MPs. "And in that event, I can tell you I will not fall short." It was surprisingly bad timing was it....
|
|
#
¿
Jun 26, 2014 09:13
|
|
|
Wiggly Wayne DDS posted:I've seen this going around so I'd like to clarify that Coulson having access to classified documents isn't precisely the issue. His clearance allowed for supervised access to them, but his statements during Leveson mentioned unsupervised access. And what was in them?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 26, 2014 10:14
|
|
|
I thought that it went like this Guilty Not guilty Innocent Meaning that just because you are not guilty doesn't mean you're innocent. I'm probably wrong but if a legal person could chime in.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 27, 2014 11:12
|
|
|
Venmoch posted:You may be getting confused with the Scottish Legal System. Under the English system we only have two results: Yes I was, sorry for the confusion. On this nonsense £100m cost is that just for this trail or does it cover the entirely of the 3 ongoing operations?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 27, 2014 11:25
|
|
|
Brown Moses posted:Rolf Harris was just found guilty, convicted of 12 accounts of indecent assault. Am I understanding this correctly? If you're found not guilty of something and then say 'haha, I totally did that' you get away with it?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 1, 2014 12:22
|
|
|
goddamnedtwisto posted:Well it's not what's happening here (Thurlbeck is accusing Kuttner, Kuttner isn't confessing) but yes - you can't be tried for the same crime twice. I understand the concept if double jeopardy, I am amazed that it's written in such a way that you can confess after acquittal and still be OK. But as you say this is one person pointing fingers to get a lesser sentence.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 1, 2014 15:31
|
|
|
Brown Moses posted:Keep in mind sentencing reflects the law at the time of the offences, which have increased significantly since the time they occurred. If he got a modern sentence what would he have expected?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 4, 2014 14:54
|
|
|
Jedit posted:Some of them are also running concurrently. Do nonces get good behaviour?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 4, 2014 15:30
|
|
|
Plavski posted:If he doesn't molest any more children in jail, sure. I expect this government to make a similar mistake as the last when they fired a nonce into space but put a child in there by mistake. Bloody nu labour!!!!
|
|
#
¿
Jul 4, 2014 15:34
|
|
|
HortonNash posted:This government had an alleged nonce on staff in Downing Street. Cameron is such a wonderful judge of character. I amazed just how bad labour have been capitalising on all the poo poo coming out of the Tory party. It writes itself, just a constant dribble of raw sewage that should have killed any other government but this lot just get away with it
|
|
#
¿
Jul 4, 2014 17:10
|
|
|
goddamnedtwisto posted:Tebbit kinda put his foot in it this morning on the Andrew Marr show - while I'm sure he was just looking to preemptively distance himself from any putative cover-up by waffling about the general Westminster culture he ended giving a pretty damning soundbite of "There was a culture that the Establishment had to be protected" which has been interpreted by a lot of reporters as "There definitely was a cover-up". They are all up to there neck in it but I get the feeling that the Tories are the worst ones of the lot (for a change) but this'll all come down to which way the papers go. This is their turn to completely poo poo all over the political class after the shoeing they have just taken. I was talking to my dad about this whole clusterfuck and it all stems from the guardian do their job and not giving up on a story. It really is one of those storied that a journalist gets into the business for; it shows how incestuous the powerful have become. Take a bow Nick Davies.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 6, 2014 23:15
|
|
|
I'm of the mind that paedo stuff would have stayed covered up if the wider hacking and corruption hadn't been exposed. This is where the guardian cones in. They didn't go along with this one rogue hacker line and kept digging which uncovered the Milly dowler story. It was this that blew the whole thing open and put the institutions of the land against each other. You could argue the paedogeddon was on the cards once the newsnight report was buried but we'll never know.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 7, 2014 08:58
|
|
|
Crashbee posted:What does the existence of PIE say about how child abuse and paedophiles were regarded in the 70s? The people behind it were willing to out themselves publicly as paedophiles, so was it just not considered a big deal? Or were they pariahs trying to jump on the civil rights bandwagon? Bit if both, it was an era when all the old norms were getting challenged so these guys came out from the shadows and stood up for paedosexuality and were somewhat accepted by the civil rights movement. This is why there was once a connection in the public eye between male homosexuality and paedophiles. Then everyone came to their senses and treated these abusive cunts the way they deserved.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 7, 2014 11:23
|
|
|
Hats off to the PM, he is announcing an enquiry BUT it'll cover the NHS and the BBC along with government. Can anyone guess which organisation (s) will come off the worse? To the point they will need total root and branch reform, something best handled by the market.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 7, 2014 14:38
|
|
|
Is this a real attempt to make this legit or an attempt by one part of the establishment to gently caress with another?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 12, 2014 16:23
|
|
|
Darth Walrus posted:Make what legit, exactly? The announced enquiry into child abuse coverups.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 12, 2014 18:23
|
|
|
Mr. Squishy posted:I feel like I'm having a stroke. Of course that's what they were asking, what on earth else could it mean? Haha, thanks man. I can sometimes be obtuse in my questions. Glad someone understands me (I'm looking at you mum). This feels more like the elites doing all they can to make this a cluster gently caress so when the truth comes out there is a convenient way of saying 'look, see it was never done properly, my friend was never a peado'
|
|
#
¿
Jul 12, 2014 19:09
|
|
|
Banano posted:Googled Russell Tricker and these Nick Davies articles came up O h god why did I read these? They a loving horrifying.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 20, 2014 21:46
|
|
|
Peter Jukes is being 'investigated' my the Daily Mail for lying to his kickstarter backers. He missed a mortgage payment due to covering the hacking trial but the heil says this is bollocks. Guess who I believe
|
|
#
¿
Jul 21, 2014 14:48
|
|
|
Brown Moses posted:MediaGuido is having a go now, looks like someone has it in for Peter Jukes and has started sending out the claims to their allies in the media. Mediaguido is that rightwing twat who thinks he's a free man of the land
|
|
#
¿
Jul 21, 2014 15:38
|
|
|
Does anyone know if the to books on the hacking trial will be coming out on kindle?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 29, 2014 23:50
|
|
|
I thought anything that came from ibtimes could be safely ignored as bullshit? But if it is true I bet he is feeling a bit of a tool for being such a good soldier. He is going to want something massive when he gets out.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 30, 2014 20:28
|
|
|
Trying to buy the beyond contempt book and I can't find the link on the hacked off website, can someone link it?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 31, 2014 22:14
|
|
|
glitchkrieg posted:Is Hack Attack actually out? Should have arrived yesterday according to Amazon but I've had no word on dispatch. I bought it on kindle earlier, don't know about the dead tree version
|
|
#
¿
Jul 31, 2014 22:56
|
|
|
OppyDoppyDopp posted:I finished reading Hack Attack this evening. There's a lot of interesting material - I wasn't aware that an infuriated Max Mosley had promised to underwrite the cost of the early litigation against News International, which in turn provided much of the documentation that firmed up the Guardian's story. I want to know how the gently caress the IOC report didn't end just about everyone.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 3, 2014 13:34
|
|
|
Whitefish posted:I'm a fool - when I download the MOBI file, how do I get it on to my kindle? You can email it to the account that is automatically created for each kindle (look in your settings) or there is a desktop app which I have never used
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 10:20
|
|
|
Brown Moses posted:Not as good as my journalism based Kickstarter (still time to contribute as well *cough*) gently caress you Brown, I just remembered how this works and I've got less drinking vouchers than I thought I did because your loving useless website hasn't taken my money yet you scumbag oval office. (Keep up the good work, I've got plenty to keep me going for the rest of the month)
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 15:28
|
|
|
Whitefish posted:Okay, thanks everyone. I probably should have been able to figure this out for myself. No problems man, never be afraid to ask questions or ask for help. Anyone who gives you poo poo for it is a oval office and can gently caress right off.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 8, 2014 10:30
|
|
|
I've just finished reading hack attack and beyond contempt. Both are brilliant books. I read hack attack first; it seemed an open and shut case against the them, that there was no way they could get away with what they did but after reading beyond contempt it became obvious that there is almost no way of making them responsible for their actions.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 15, 2014 09:58
|
|
|
Brown Moses posted:By someone, I'm getting site moved to Google Ideas Project Shield as soon as possible, so that should stop DDoS attacks being a problem.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 25, 2014 22:50
|
|
|
gently caress buying the mail in Sunday so can someone tell me what they said about Woolf and Brittan?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 7, 2014 14:06
|
|
|
Brown Moses posted:So after Brooks and co decided not to ask for costs to be repaid, the remaining two people, Charlie Brooks and Stuart Kutner, have also had their application for costs rejected, because their "conduct brought suspicion on themselves". Can this in any way, shape or form be construed to mean that the judge thinks they are guilt as hell but the barstards got way with it? (I know the answer is no, but a man can hope)
|
|
#
¿
Oct 15, 2014 15:18
|
|
|
In a a lot of the bribery cases that are on going there are allocations that Mrs Brooks was aware of payments. If these people are found guilty doesn't take also make her guilt by extension? And if so would that be a basis of a retrial?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 2, 2014 15:48
|
|
|
Rumfitt:"police + prosecution allowed themselves to be spoonfed evidence by mighty multinational [News Int] desperate to save its own skin" This was a tweet from @lisaocarroll, and I have to agree. I think NI have been very clever in who they have given up. Makes me wonder what they have buried while we have been distracted.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2014 16:27
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 20:08 |
|
|
Mr. Squishy posted:Her web-guru was exposed as a sex-pest and I guess she's not found another one. Pedo to be accurate, and in a hosed up why fitting for what is being discussed here
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2015 23:55
|
|