|
Less, with the internet becoming increasingly viable print media refusing to look for new readers and/or branding them as morons they are probably going to try even more shocking things to keep themselves relevent. I give it 5 years if this new stuff isn't implemented till we are all back here.
|
#
¿
Nov 29, 2012 20:53
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 21:48 |
|
|
Okay, so what is the story here, I looked up the chap but all I could find was one, very arse covering, guardian interview in which he basically says "not only were they put their by dedicated internet hackers, but just because I have looked for and found pictures of barely legal girls arousing doesn't mean I am a paedophile, also I accepted this caution as a legal thing but I am totally not looking for under-age girl pictures on the internet". I don't get it at all.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 10, 2013 21:56
|
|
|
Mr. Squishy posted:He was a tory web guru who hadn't registered lukebozier.com. Some wag noticed this, regged it for him, and put up a short message calling him a twit. Bozier noticed this, lawyered up, and nameless wag posted the legal threats up there too. Months passed, and then lukebozier.com posted a fairly compelling narrative which was pulled from hacked emails detailing Bozier's posts on a paid-for child pornography forum and his craigslist solicitations which were equally dodgy. Those are gone now, but that's what the caution's about, and why he and Mensch are no longer on speaking terms. poo poo The Bed. That suddenly makes this make a whole load more sense and would explain the caution over the "I occasionally accidentally found people who are legal age attractive" thing. But why wasn't this mentioned in the Guardian? I mean I know it is from hacked sources but seriously? Jesus. Josef bugman fucked around with this message at 22:28 on Jul 10, 2013 |
|
#
¿
Jul 10, 2013 22:24
|
|
|
cloudchamber posted:He made a big deal out of defecting to the Tory party before launching his social networking site with Mensch. So this is yet another Tory sex scandal? Fantastic.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 11, 2013 00:04
|
|
|
Wow, so why doesn't the Gaurdian article mention that the guy has basically admitted to being interested in kids? I mean, alright, he isn't a child abuser (that we know of) but surely he should at least be in all of the therapy at the moment.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 11, 2013 18:45
|
|
|
So, let me get this straight, he is looking at pictures of underage (9 or below? What in the gently caress) girls and then sending them pictures of a penis that isn't even his? The internet is so loving weird.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 12, 2013 00:44
|
|
|
limited posted:
I am guessing something involving magic will be the main defence.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 31, 2013 22:03
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 21:48 |
|
|
baka kaba posted:I like the Mail's sheer desperation to claw back some support. FREE CASH! WE PUT FIFTY QUID IN SOME PAPERS!! C'MON!!! Wait, has the mails circulation been dropping? Oh please tell me that it has!
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2013 08:26
|
|