|
iyaayas01 posted:That, the wing sweep is manual (you sweep the wings by pulling a lever, and doing so at the wrong speed/AoA/other flight regime can send the aircraft into uncontrolled flight), and it is pretty easy to overspeed because once you hit a certain point (IIRC somewhere just below Mach 2, give or take) a friction lock engaged making it impossible to rapidly reduce the throttle. From the idiots thread: Thanks for mentioning that book in the other thread, read it the other week and it was excellent.
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2025 17:33 |
|
Godholio posted:Look at their covers. Bearskin!
|
![]() |
|
Christoff posted:But I mean what were they thinking the first time? That they'd win? They were ruled by an unpopular and bellicose military junta and not a representative democracy?
|
![]() |
|
Limp Wristed Limey posted:Thats because they are idiots. I have seen people on the left weep about the injustice of Israel taking Palestinian land and then in the next sentence complain about how awful Thatcher was for fighting a poor helpless military junta that murdered 20,000 of their political opponents. There were serious disagreements between Jeanne Kirkpatrick and Weinberger, but Weinberger won, and US support was more than just AIM-9Ls and satellite images, the war wouldn't have been possible without using Ascension Island and the USAF base there.
|
![]() |
|
Godholio posted:Seconding. I was there for Atlantis' (and the STS program's) final launch, and there's seriously just awesome stuff EVERYWHERE. I'd go back in a heartbeat. It was pretty amazing, although the low cloud layer was a bit of a bummer.
|
![]() |
|
Godholio posted:Fun story: For some reason I was over at one of the fighter squadrons at Tyndall...I'm guessing I was getting my gear to get an F-15 ride. Anyway, a flight of TDY F-16s had just finished fighting an F-22 and the pilots were talking. Their squadron commander was on the mission, and was exceedingly proud of himself because he actually killed the Raptor. On the downside, it was after all four of them had already died BVR and the F-22 killed his wingman againin the merge... Realistically how likely are BVR shots like that ever going to be? If you're China or whomever and you're going to war against a bunch of F-22s, the first thing you'd do is make sure it looked like the skies were full of 747s or something that would ensure pilots would have to make sure they weren't about to recreate KAL007.
|
![]() |
|
Can-O-Raid posted:Apparently not, so the F-35 should be a perfect replacement for it. That thing's gonna make the Osprey look like a Toyota. F-22 Stranglehawk.
|
![]() |
|
Crescendo posted:facile jingoism This. So much this.
|
![]() |
|
Booblord Zagats posted:But how do they feel about Star Trek? F-22 Stranglehawk
|
![]() |
|
Is that the one that can't turn their boilers up all the way because they didn't use proper firebricks?
|
![]() |
|
buttplug posted:Bro you're a GS...That's all you loving guys do all day anyways: fill a chair and keep younger (more qualified) guys from progressing through the system. In my experience it's mainly the GS-15s that are the impediment to the efficient working of the federal government. They get promoted past their level of competence but can't be fired, and just keep clogging up the works.
|
![]() |
|
Are those cats or dogs?
|
![]() |
|
Hexyflexy posted:
For most of it's (quite long) service life it was used as a tanker, FYI. And they were finally retired quite a few years after the Falklands.
|
![]() |
|
When did France switch to multicam?
|
![]() |
|
Duzzy Funlop posted:
The only two things comparable in noise to an SR-71 taking off that I've experienced are a full grid of 3L F1 cars going past at full chat at Monaco (where I was standing about 10' away from the armco) and seeing the Space Shuttle take off (standing about as close as they let anyone get, just the far side of the big clock). The SR-71 was still louder than either of those.
|
![]() |
|
Genocide Tendency posted:I want someone important to give me a good loving explanation as to why the SR71 is retired. Rich Graham (last SR-71 Wing Commander) goes into that quite a lot in this book: http://www.amazon.com/SR-71-Revealed-Richard-H-Graham/dp/0760301220/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&qid=1419975813&sr=8-5&keywords=SR-71 Taking a job in that wing meant getting marginalized for senior command which meant there weren't any SR-71 defenders in the right places to stop it getting axed when people who didn't like the plane wanted it gone.
|
![]() |
|
Two Finger posted:I don't have anything useful to add except that the SR71 loving owns bones. Um, no. The original single seater was called the A-12 and was built for the CIA. Here you go, read all about it: http://www.foia.cia.gov/sites/default/files/DOC_0000190094.pdf https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs/a-12/index.html
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2025 17:33 |
|
Chinatown posted:The A-12 in San Diego is free to see (infront of the Air & Space Museum) and is dope as hell especially considering it first flew over 45 years ago. It's in a terrible state and gets worse every time I see it ![]() ![]() Air and Space Museum, San Diego by Dr Gitlin, on Flickr Two-seater trainer at the California Science Center in LA: ![]() A-12 by Dr Gitlin, on Flickr ![]() A-12 by Dr Gitlin, on Flickr The Smithsonian SR-71: ![]() ![]() Udvar-Hazy Smithsonian Annex by Dr Gitlin, on Flickr Gloomy shot of the SR-71 at the USAF museum in Dayton, OH (it's very dark in there). ![]() USAF Museum, Wright Patterson AFB by Dr Gitlin, on Flickr drgitlin fucked around with this message at 13:38 on Jan 1, 2015 |
![]() |