|
Another chance at beating OYM, I'm in!!
|
#
¿
Dec 14, 2012 05:29
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 16:00 |
|
|
quote:Season performance of the entire Tier While I like it to be performance based and random, what if the best league in Tier B had most points overall...why should he be relegated to Tier B, when he was actually the highest scoring team. Couldn't we still take the top of both tiers, make it Tier A and still keep keepers? I don't see why not.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 14, 2012 13:58
|
|
|
LmaoTheKid posted:Holy crap this is going to be hardcore and I cannot loving wait I'm with ya...I'm excited for it. I did a "goon" money league this year, that I'll probably drop for this one next year. I like the specific rules that will develop in this one. Plus Zypher and OYM really sound like they know what they are talking about, so when it's all hashed out, I think it will be solid!
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2012 01:26
|
|
|
While I'm not totally against penalties for keepers, to generate more movement, I rather like not being able to keep your first round and every other round can be kept at a cost of -1 round. Unlimited amount, but only if they are a starter, cannot keep them if it means they will be on your bench.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 18, 2012 14:33
|
|
|
HiroProtagonist posted:That seems kind of unenforceable in practical terms. I don't want the commish to head up the brute squad and have to check rosters every week to keep team managers in line. I'm not sure what you mean by this? My suggestion is for determining keeper players, which is a 1 time practice, not an every week thing. If they are going to enforce a -1 round penalty, I don't see how making sure they weren't your first round pick being that difficult to manage? If you can only start 1 QB, I don't think you should be able to keep 2.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 18, 2012 18:30
|
|
|
Mikey Purp posted:I'm not sure I'm into this idea. Short of regular roster limits, I don't think there should be any other sort of restrictions as to how many players of a certain position you can keep. If you want to be an idiot and keep 2 or 3 QBs as bargaining chips for next season and suffer as a result, more power to you. I also like the idea of being able to keep your starting QB and a speculative rookie QB or Fair point. I only suggested it to generate more movement. In other dynasty leagues I have seen or been in, it always seems that the same people stayed at the top, due to the players they kept every year. And my suggestions were to promote movement around top tiered players, instead of being dynasty to one team forever.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 18, 2012 19:29
|
|
|
Voting for B as well.
|
|
#
¿
May 7, 2013 20:34
|
|
|
Sent. Prefer the Sunday, and if it changes to the 10/11 weekend, I'd prefer that. But can make the 3/4 weekend work if need be.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 10, 2013 20:53
|
|
|
My $.02 on IDP I am a huge fan of IDP scoring. That being said, when introducing IDP scoring into a league, what is your goal? Which types of players do you want to reward more? Or do you want there to be balance. Preferably, I'd go with the more balanced approach. If you're going to reward 1 point per tackle, .5 per assist tackle, then your Sacks, INT and FF need to be worth more. I've been doing IDP for 5+ years to various degrees of scoring. I've done Goonball's insane scoring of 1.5 per tackle and 1 for assists, with 4 per INT and 4 for sacks. That's a bit much for me, so I've always favored the following scoring system for IDP. Tackles - 1 Asst Tackles - .5 Sack - 3 Interception - 3 Force Fumble - 2 Fumble Recovery - 2 Pass Defense - 2 TDs - 6 Blocked Kick - 2 Safety - 2 Really, just the additional point for sacks, INT and pass defense make quite the difference in balancing out LB vs DB vs DE. And it also makes the elite LBs who can "do it all" stand out as well. Which is what you want. Edit: This will put the elite Defensive players around the 170 - 180ish mark for end of year scoring. Boywunda fucked around with this message at 21:53 on Jul 15, 2013 |
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2013 21:41
|
|
|
Diqnol posted:League I'm in that is super IDP heavy has the following scoring: That seems like a really good balance actually. I'd like to try that myself. It really is telling that if tackles are worth a significant amount of points, all other categories need to be raised up to balance it.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2013 21:54
|
|
|
Obama Yo Mama posted:Yeah, my paypal email is different. Send my invite to akickassduke @ gmail Looks like we've only got 2 leagues together this year (assuming CG's Dynasty still happens), but i fully expect us to be top tier next year. Game on!!
|
|
#
¿
Jul 25, 2013 21:01
|
|
|
Holy poo poo - we draft tomorrow!! I haven't been less prepared for a draft than I feel right now. Mainly because I've never drafted before week 3 of the preseason before...
|
|
#
¿
Aug 9, 2013 20:52
|
|
|
(232) Team Boywunda - Manti Te'o LB I win!
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2013 20:49
|
|
|
@old dog child, after the week Boldin had last week, your faith in Sherman shutting him down is amazing. And it worked really well. I'm impressed. Granted your Golden Tate option wasn't much better, I'm still impressed you chose to sit Boldin and were correct in that assumption.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2013 19:38
|
|
|
Someone's still undefeated! OYM, I swear you're cursed vs me.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2013 00:15
|
|
|
Diqnol posted:I've got you next week and eagerly await the opportunity to remedy this. And assuming we're in the same tier.....which we're not. :-O
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2013 04:30
|
|
|
Diqnol posted:Note to self: check thread title before posting Oh yeah, I nearly forgot, I'm undefeated in THAT league too. I find that one more hilarious, since I had to auto-draft and draft 4 QBs, yet still managed to have a rather productive team.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2013 13:29
|
|
|
old dog child posted:I am about to change the loving world Yup!
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2013 04:42
|
|
|
old dog child posted:I am about to change the loving world It was really hard giving up Forte, but gaining Peyton was an opportunity that I just couldn't pass up. Big props to old dog for following through on the trade after the horrible news of Julio going down and Ryan losing his #1 target. We made the deal on Monday evening, before Julio was injured and him accepting the offer later shows great sportsmanship and I have big respect for him. I have Martin in my big money league as well. I have faith, so getting both him and Manning could be a really good move for me. Only time will tell, but I'm excited. Edit, for those in Jerkers, myself and old dog child made a monster trade. I give Ryan, Forte and Torrey Smith Old dog child gives Peyton Manning and Martin.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2013 14:40
|
|
|
Please proceed. Thanks commish!
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2013 23:27
|
|
|
Chen Kenichi posted:What a difference a couple of days makes! Ya, I could have been a dick, but I'm a nice guy at heart.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 11, 2013 03:02
|
|
|
old dog child posted:I just want to stress that my loss was due to reasons entirely unrelated to our trade...which is probably worse Destroyed? I wouldn't say that. The monster QB I traded for put up mediocre numbers. My #1 WR is hurt, the RB that I thought was going to start lighting it up is still struggling. However I'm glad I get to start Denarious regularly now, as he's looking pretty good. I am glad I squeaked a win out, as my future appears bright.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2013 19:40
|
|
I honestly thought my team would hold up this week! I was confident and bold in all my decisions...no tinkering, no advice, no random add/drops...and yet you loving destroyed me god drat. Good game.
|
GOD loving drat IT!!!!
|
|
#
¿
Oct 21, 2013 16:44
|
|
|
Mikey Purp posted:My team is officially in the poo poo house with Doug Martin, Danny Amendola and Demarco Murray all dead. Now entertaining all ridiculous lowball offers in Tier Jerkers. Hey Doug Martin Murray buddy, over in the Wild Front Tier 
|
|
#
¿
Oct 23, 2013 18:13
|
|
|
Suave Fedora posted:Some trades should just be left untraded. I got sucked into Peyton Manning. But I honestly thought Dougie was going to turn it around. Maybe James will.....maybe.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 23, 2013 18:19
|
|
|
Started Peyton and Calvin and I still might lose this week. Ugh
|
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2013 14:48
|
|
|
Suave Fedora posted:OLD DOG CHILD As someone who got the lower end of one of his actual trades, I approve of this message!
|
|
#
¿
Oct 30, 2013 18:18
|
|
|
Needed 14 points from Mike James and Lamar Miller. Thought I shoul dhave had it. Then I watch Mike James tear it up in the first quarter and I'm like - sweet, I think it's going to happen. Then James dies on the field..... Ever since the trade I made, my team has gone downhill.....ugh
|
|
#
¿
Nov 12, 2013 16:48
|
|
|
Azhais posted:So we're saying I should tank hard to blow the 22 point jerker lead so I can redraft next year? I like this guy. He's got moxy!
|
|
#
¿
Nov 27, 2013 01:35
|
|
|
Zypher posted:Frontal middling playoff teams Well I've started off pretty good so far. If I happen to sneak into the playoffs, beware of Megatron, Peyton, Murray, Brown combination....could be your end!!
|
|
#
¿
Nov 29, 2013 19:45
|
|
|
Zypher posted:Wild Front has Also, who on Wild Front didn't start Decker? I bet those decisions are what could cost us not getting the 'A' tier. Edit: I'm looking and I see Wild Front still has the following players still to play Jimmy Graham, Drew Brees, Darren Sproles, Earl Thomas, Russell Wilson, Garret Hartley, Marshawn Lynch Boywunda fucked around with this message at 16:45 on Dec 2, 2013 |
|
#
¿
Dec 2, 2013 16:33
|
|
|
Sorry, trying to understand the Tier A and Tier B thing. My understanding is that the tier with the highest Points For (PF) will be Tier A. My count after Week 12. Wild Front - 19135.3 Jerkers - 19429.7 Jerkers with a 294.4 lead. Week 13 totals as of this morning Wild Front - 1561.7 Jerkers - 1632.6 Jerkers with a 70.9 lead Making the Jerkers total lead 365.3 Is my logic wrong? How did Zypher show that Wild Front has a 3.5 point lead?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 2, 2013 17:53
|
|
|
Zypher posted:Remember that only the top 8 teams in Points For are being counted in the competition between the two tiers. So in the case of Brees and Sproles, those players are on a team that will most likely not be counted. Oh, I didn't know that. I was going by what was in the OP Zypher posted:The first year, the two tiers will be randomly assigned. At the end of the regular season, the tier with the highest combined Points For at will become Tier A and the other will become Tier B. Never mind then, I understand.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 2, 2013 18:09
|
|
|
old dog child posted:Boywunda, I think it's fitting that we get a Peyton vs Forte showdown to start the playoffs I was thinking the same thing.....Good luck to you. NOT!
|
|
#
¿
Dec 3, 2013 18:47
|
|
|
old dog child posted:edit: 54.1-93.2
|
|
#
¿
Dec 9, 2013 02:06
|
|
|
In my main league, I'm down 18 with Romo and Dez vs his Forte and Hartley. I really don't know what exactly I'm rooting for. Romo to explode and all of Chicago to implode I guess.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 9, 2013 02:46
|
|
|
Not that I'm trying to stir the pot (but really I am), but don't we want active managers regardless of where they finish? Take booby2times. Not setting his roster. I don't know bobby2times and maybe there is a good reason, but do we really want managers who don't set their rosters every week? I know there are definite exceptions to be made, but Zypher's "Once again bobby didn't set a full roster as he still has an injured Justin Houston in his starting lineup." line just bugs me. Especially when guys like Deer_fire would be very active and set lineups regardless. Thoughts?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 9, 2013 21:29
|
|
|
Mikey Purp posted:I agree, but we're talking about the relegation bracket here. By its very definition this bracket should hold all of the non-actives with bottom of the barrel teams and roster management. If we don't have a policy of outright booting inactives, then this is the next best thing. If bobby2times gives up on this lost season that's probably ok, and if he ends up winning his match up, all you can really do is laugh and hope that he steps up and returns for next year. I agree that it probably is the "next best thing", but I was under the assumption that this league is rather structured and recruiting for it almost strictly stated that this was intended for active managers. Seeing someone not set their rosters for a few weeks, before the relegation bracket was even determined is what is troublesome. Hence why I bolded the "Once again" words in Zypher's statement. The relegation bracket still gives you something to fight for, not a reason to give up.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 9, 2013 22:17
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 16:00 |
|
|
Well old dog child, you better take this win to the house and win it all. Good game sir!
|
|
#
¿
Dec 10, 2013 05:26
|
|