|
Gozinbulx posted:I watched New World last night. I'm not too familiar with Korean cinema (only seen Oldboy and The Host), but it was pretty drat good. Planning to finally watch it this coming weekend, look forward to hearing some discussion.
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2013 04:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 02:09 |
|
|
Yeah, I'd love to discuss it, too, because I liked it a lot, and more people should watch it. I just thought New World was so straightforward in its narrative that there's not too much to discuss in that regard at least.
rvm fucked around with this message at 16:49 on Jul 30, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2013 16:44
|
|
|
New World spoilers below: I thought it was a pretty good movie, it was at least Choi's best film since his return from retirement, but, and maybe it's just me, I found the story a little too convoluted in certain parts with the interaction between the Chinese and the Koreans. Honestly I think the part that made it so confusing was the fact that every single actor in this movie *looked* Korean, I would have never pegged any of them for being Chinese or part Chinese. So when people would refer to the Chinese guys I didn't always knew who they were talking about. I thought the end was very good I liked the aspect of the mole actually deciding to become a die hard gangster (and clean house in the process) instead of the typical ending of the cop being completely devoted and unwavering. I wouldn't put it up there with top tier Korean films, but I thought it was worth viewing. Then again the last Korean film that I saw and really enjoyed was "The Thieves", so maybe I'm going soft in my old age.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2013 05:58
|
|
|
Gozinbulx posted:I watched New World last night. I'm not too familiar with Korean cinema (only seen Oldboy and The Host), but it was pretty drat good. Try to discuss something if you've seen it. I'm the only one in this thread who watches this stuff new and I have no idea when anyone else is even going to get access to it. Even Snowpiercer doesn't have a set US release date, and most of the people in it are Americans. Anyway, The New World! This might be as good a time as any to post the Q&A session with director Park Hoon-Jeong. What I found really interesting about the movie was how the melodrama actually worked really, really well in context. I never would have expected a gangster movie could be improved by melodrama but that's exactly what happened. It's pretty weird to take stock of the movie in retrospect and realize that all those scenes that seemed like comic relief were actually important character-building.  Let Me Out is the story of a an aspiring film director who learns that making movies is harder than it looks. As much as I'd like to be gung-ho about this movie I wasn't that impressed. It was basically exactly that sentence plus zombie jokes. If that's enough for you then great, give it a look because it's coming out on August 15th.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2013 10:13
|
|
|
Well, I'm going to put this all in spoilers cause I don't feel like determining what is or isn't a spoiler about New World: 2 of the things I found most interesting have just been touched on, somewhat. First was the whole Chinese/Chinese descendant aspect. It was pretty illuminating as to Koreans' views of Chinese, at least from the perspective of this director (I won't say all Korean's feel this way cause one director). Basically that the Chinese and those descended from then (which, as you said, I could not tell apart physically, but then again I'm just an American), where all portrayed as loud, brash, avuncular louts, minus the main protagonist and the other dude whose name I don't remember that is the other police mole that ja-sung whacks at the end. Both the moles were supposed Chinese descendant, and all of the other gang members kept on reminding of it. In a "positive" sense when they said they would be to control the other Chinese descended foot soldiers, and then negatively (most of the time) when they would refer to them as "loving chinks" (that's how the subtitles translated it). Probably the most potent illustration is the Yanban Hobos, who are actually from China (had to look it up), and are all drunken, loud, incredibly violent thugs. That interplay was very interesting. The second was the ending. Perhaps it was just my Western expectations, but it really caught me off guard. I did think for a second "well, if we kills the chief and his boss at the station, he could pretty much live the rest of his life as a certified gangster" but I didn't think he would actually do it. So I guess it was just surprising that he just decided to turn "full bad" instead of any real redemption. Is there a different take on the end among Korean audiences? Is it not so clear cut "bad"? I mean, I sincerely doubt it, but maybe i'm projecting my own cultural ideas on something erroneously. Also the very very end, I didn't quite understand what it meant to illustrate. The part where he and Cheong walk into some random seafood store and apparently murder a whole bunch of dudes. Was it meant to illustrate that he was a pretty bad/tough/violent/sociopathic dude to begin with? Didn't really get it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2013 15:14
|
|
|
Gozinbulx posted:Well, I'm going to put this all in spoilers cause I don't feel like determining what is or isn't a spoiler about New World: This part took me a minute to process as well, I actually had the brief belief that perhaps that scene took place BEFORE he was recruited by the police, and that we were actually seeing that he put himself into the police as a mole in order to get put in as a double agent into the mob so he could take over. Then after I looked it up online I realized the timeline was off so this was completely wrong. Anyways, I think maybe it was to show the bond that the two guys had with each other, which is why, even though the one guy learned that the other was a mole he didn't have him killed right away.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2013 16:52
|
|
|
zandert33 posted:This part took me a minute to process as well, I actually had the brief belief that perhaps that scene took place BEFORE he was recruited by the police, and that we were actually seeing that he put himself into the police as a mole in order to get put in as a double agent into the mob so he could take over. Then after I looked it up online I realized the timeline was off so this was completely wrong. Anyways, I think maybe it was to show the bond that the two guys had with each other, which is why, even though the one guy learned that the other was a mole he didn't have him killed right away. Yeah, if I remember correctly the scene took place 6 years earlier, whereas ja-sung had been a mole for almost 10 years or something. So its just a nice bonding scene, bonding over relentless, brutal murder of dozens of people? Thats nice. Really like the film.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2013 17:34
|
|
|
Living in Korea for going on 9 years, I've see a lot of Korean movies. Much like American movies, a good deal of them are tripe, but there's still a few gems. Park Chan Wook is awesome. Mr. Vengeance remains one of my all-time favorite movies. Song Gang Ho is such a good actor. Kim Ki Duk I just don't get. I really feel like it's an emperor's new clothes kind of thing. I just don't think his movies are that great. With the exception of Pieta, there's always a woman who's a hooker or morally bankrupt and a character that doesn't talk. One movie you may not have seen because it's Japanese (although about Korea, in a way) is Blood and Bones. I'd suggest checking it out if you like the depressing, gritty brutal life stories like Breathless (the original name is "poo poo Fly", which I think is much more appropriate).
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2013 09:11
|
|
|
Looking forward to Snowpiercer? If you live in the US get ready to import it: http://twitchfilm.com/2013/08/weinstein-thinks-you-are-too-dumb-for-snowpiercer.html
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2013 16:01
|
|
|
ladron posted:
Breathless was awesome and I wish more people would see it. Top 3 for sure, huge downer though.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2013 23:34
|
|
|
I'm genuinely really puzzled by this whole Snowpiercer thing. I've been mentally classifying it with Stoker and The Last Stand the last several months because they've always been presented as this distinct set of American films with Korean directors because Korean film is so hip and trendy. And now Snowpiercer isn't getting a real release, even though it's by far the most mainstream film of the set. It's breaking records at the Korean box office, and it's using a print with English subtitles for the few Korean portions of the film. I don't get why the Weinstein Company even wanted the rights to this movie in the first place if they were just going sit on the distribution and cut twenty minutes from it. How could this possibly make them more money than just releasing it at the same time it came out in Korean theaters? It's the time of summer where people hate heat so much they'll watch The Smurfs and the movie's about a frozen train. You're not going to get more ideal conditions than that.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2013 01:42
|
|
|
The Weinsteins have done exactly that for over a decade now, driving people like me to avoid their stuff altogether. Also My PS Partner is awesome awesome awesome.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2013 08:16
|
|
|
Hanging out with some friends last night , I remembered another interesting Korean movie Take Care of My Cat. It's about 5 female friends and how their lives change after high school, following their dreams and whatnot. No blood or suspense or anything like that, just an interesting, well done movie.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2013 05:30
|
|
|
Wow, Korea makes movies that don't have blood and suspense? Tell me more.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2013 05:33
|
|
|
zandert33 posted:Wow, Korea makes movies that don't have blood and suspense? Tell me more. Take a look at the movies that have been named so far, and tell me how many have neither blood nor suspense.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2013 05:37
|
|
|
Tars Tarkas posted:
I watched it at this recommendation, and even though there's a lot about it that seems pretty typical for the genre it still was very charming, and one of the better romcoms I've seen lately. Anybody check out "Men's Manual"/"How to Use Guys with Secret Tips"? That one appears to be getting a fair bit of hype.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2013 15:02
|
|
|
zandert33 posted:Looking forward to Snowpiercer? If you live in the US get ready to import it: I don't know exactly what they cut out of it, but I just watched it in theaters and gotta say that it was actually a really well done film. I guess I'm biased because I have lived in SK for the past 5 years and generally like SK media, but the film was surprisingly good. There are some rather.... ham-fisted parts like when, before a fight with a bunch of dudes with axes, the bad guys slowly cut into a fish to get blood on their axes but other then those (very small parts) the movie was interesting. I'd highly recommend watching it. If I had to guess I think they are going to cut some of the middle sections out of the movie for US release. I could see how the film could lose a couple of those segments and still have the story relatively intact, but it depends on what is being chopped. Either way, Snowpiercer was a pretty good sci-fi movie.
|
|
#
?
Aug 11, 2013 22:59
|
|
|
I really don't know what twenty minutes are going to be cut out of it. It's not a slow movie by any stretch of the imagination and it moves pretty briskly. Apparently Bong Joon-Ho is the one who's going to be making the cuts, though. Why he would have any idea which twenty minutes would be the most boring to American audiences I have no idea. I guess it's better than the alternative. No, the worse alternative, not the intelligent one of just screening the print they already have. I mean, good grief, it's only two hours long. So, I'd like to take a minute to discuss the Korean Film Archive. It's a complex in the Mapo district of Seoul that stores film. What's really neat about is that they have a free film library and anyone can go in and watch any movie, from anywhere, ever, for free in one of the film kiosks. If you're not picky about what movies you watch, there's also a full theater in the basement of the complex with regular bi-weekly themes. Not always Korean ones, necessarily. Right now it's a retrospective on Korean horror films. The last one was high-concept Hollywood blockbusters, and before that was Westerns, including the few period Korean Westerns. The themes can get really specific and weird sometimes, like the time they did the complete works of Michael Werner Fassbinder. Whether foreign films have English subtitles usually depends on the prints they have. Sometimes they're preloaded with English subs, sometimes not, though Korean films typically don't have them unless it's a special series. Still, if you've ever wanted to see A Tale Of Two Sisters in a full-sized surround sound movie theater for free, this is your chance. Their English website is here. I'm there pretty much every day, so if you see a young foreigner that's probably me and you should say hi. Anyway, by request-  The film is way more tasteful than that poster makes it look. How To Use Guys With Secret Tips is about a professionally frustrated woman who ends up using a set of old VHS tapes to make inroads in her career. The art design is gloriously vintage and cheesy. And there's actually no magic- everything is exactly as goofy as it sounds, which is most of the movie's charm. Very interesting use of real-life ideas and reasoning considering this is a romantic comedy, where those rules normally go out the window. It's not quite intelligent enough to make the most of its more ambitious story elements, but it's still very funny, charming, and unique.
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2013 06:10
|
|
|
So I'm in Korea for a few days and I caught Snowpiercer in theaters, is it kosher to discuss it in detail or is there a courtesy rule to wait until it hits western theaters? I enjoyed it a lot, though I do have some questions about the ending that I'm hoping I could discuss with other people.
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2013 06:35
|
|
|
Some Guy TT posted:So, I'd like to take a minute to discuss the Korean Film Archive. It's a complex in the Mapo district of Seoul that stores film. What's really neat about is that they have a free film library and anyone can go in and watch any movie, from anywhere, ever, for free in one of the film kiosks. If you're not picky about what movies you watch, there's also a full theater in the basement of the complex with regular bi-weekly themes. Not always Korean ones, necessarily. Right now it's a retrospective on Korean horror films. The last one was high-concept Hollywood blockbusters, and before that was Westerns, including the few period Korean Westerns. The themes can get really specific and weird sometimes, like the time they did the complete works of Michael Werner Fassbinder. Whether foreign films have English subtitles usually depends on the prints they have. Sometimes they're preloaded with English subs, sometimes not, though Korean films typically don't have them unless it's a special series. Still, if you've ever wanted to see A Tale Of Two Sisters in a full-sized surround sound movie theater for free, this is your chance. Their English website is here. I'm there pretty much every day, so if you see a young foreigner that's probably me and you should say hi. This is awesome and I had no idea. AnonSpore posted:So I'm in Korea for a few days and I caught Snowpiercer in theaters, is it kosher to discuss it in detail or is there a courtesy rule to wait until it hits western theaters? I enjoyed it a lot, though I do have some questions about the ending that I'm hoping I could discuss with other people. I'd say ask, just put it in spoilers
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2013 06:45
|
|
|
Alright, here goes: First off, why did Gilliam tell Curtis not to trust Wilford? If Wilford was telling the truth at the end, and there's no reason to assume otherwise, he and Gilliam were in cahoots all along and Curtis was never meant to reach the engine room at all. I realize that at the point in the revolution where they had actually breached to the water room, the plan had already gone off the rails, but even then I can't imagine that Gilliam could have expected Curtis was ever going to reach the engine room and meet Wilford face to face. And even if he did, killing Wilford would have destroyed the entire system, which is specifically what Wilford and Gilliam were working to prevent. About the ending itself: Can anyone offer some interpretations of it? The way I saw it, the polar bear represented life going on, without humanity. Jonah and Timmy are possibly the last two human beings left on the planet, and they're both train babies so it's likely they won't last long. But the polar bear looked well fed, so it kinda felt like even though humanity was gone, life itself wasn't extinct. There was still an ecosystem in place, with everything in its allotted spot, except for mankind which was trying to be where it didn't belong anymore. Sorta like human beings themselves as a whole were going against the whole spiel that Wilford and Mason have going on. But that doesn't seem to be what the rest of the movie was saying (to be honest I have no idea what the rest of the movie was saying in light of the ending, considering that Curtis's desire to reach the front of the train and Minsoo's desire to live in the outside world both more or less directly caused the extinction of humanity) so I'm stumped. That was a bad ramble because I am dumb with words but I hope someone can clear things up for me.
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2013 07:49
|
|
|
Some Guy TT posted:So, I'd like to take a minute to discuss the Korean Film Archive. It's a complex in the Mapo district of Seoul that stores film. Uggh I lived in Mapo-gu for a year and a half and had no idea this existed. If you're reading this thread and currently live in Korea, take advantage of this because it sounds awesome!
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2013 15:19
|
|
|
Some Guy TT posted:
I actually caught it this weekend as well. I thought the first half was great, really charming and fun, but the second half after she became famous just did nothing for me. Kinda disappointed overall.
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2013 18:59
|
|
|
AnonSpore posted:Snowpiercer stuff Well I'm no cinema critic and I sure as hell suck at interpretation, but.... WORDS ABOUT SNOWPIERCER For your first question, I think that Gilliam told Curtis not to trust Wilford mainly because he expected Curtis to never reach the engine. If you'll remember, there was the "Have an egg and eat freakin' SMG bullets" segment, so I'm pretty sure the plan was for Curtis to bite it in the school and *poof* revolution over. Purpose would have been served, Wilford and Gilliam could have purged the back cars and gone back to the status quo. Instead, well, Curtis didn't die. About the ending; I read (well, I tried to read, my fiance helped me) an interview with the director and he basically said "Don't think about it too much." The guy seems absolutely hilarious and I imagine that critics will read all sorts of dumb poo poo into the ending, but pretty much his words were "your first reaction is the right one." I took that to mean that life is going to go on. I imagine that other people could have possibly survived the derailing of the train, there are all those food stores in the train that could (with a poo poo load of work) be gotten to and all that gunk. A lot of the directors answers to "How did ~ " or "Why did ~ " questions were "Just cause" which I thought was really refreshing. As an example, he was asked how both Tuna and Salmon could coexist in the train. His answer? Basically "I dunno, don't think about it so much." With that said, my initial reaction to the ending was, well, humanity is screwed. I mean, a little 5 year old boy and a teenage drug addict are the only apparent survivors? But my fiance had the "Well they'll do alright, there has to be other survivors" reaction so I imagine the ending is pretty much open to interpretation. With all that said, the movie was pretty awesome. I'm not exactly sure what 20 minutes will be cut either, but I think it could be done in such a way as to preserve the story and overall tone of the movie. The director basically said that a lot of the more political undertones of the movie might be cut, but who knows? I for one think that the black woman screaming for chicken will probably be cut because... well.. while that got a laugh out of me it was more along the lines of "Wooo boy, that shouldn't be there" kind of laugh. I'm sure there are lots of little things that can be chopped out, like some of the walking through cars, maybe a little bit of the school car (the song or the escapees frozen [according to director, the leader was Minsoo's wife]), maybe the fat dude shooting at them through the window of the train that wouldn't really effect the overall story too much. Also, if you understand the Korean language listening to Minsoo vs. what comes out of the translator box is a lot of fun. The whole translator box is a genius idea because it lets the movie maintain its Korean aspects while opening it up for international audiences.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2013 03:31
|
|
|
USMC_Karl posted:Well I'm no cinema critic and I sure as hell suck at interpretation, but.... WORDS ABOUT SNOWPIERCER Well the thing is, if Curtis had never been meant to reach Wilford in the first place, Gilliam honestly had no reason to tell Curtis anything. In the sense of Snowpiercer as a movie it makes sense because it's foreshadowing that Gilliam knew/knows Wilford, that he's expecting Wilford to betray him for the revolution going too well, etc., but it doesn't make "sense" from a realistic point of view (and I realize this is a really stupid thing to bring up in a movie where a fight to the death will stop for a second because it's January 1st, but there you have it). In regards to the ending, I'll go with that. I'm not usually one to really critically think about things in movies, it just bothered me how humanity seemed screwed as a direct result of both main characters' decisions/wishes. As an aside, the film sorta reminded me of Robert Heinlein's novel "Orphans of the Sky" about a generation ship on the way to Alpha Centauri where over time people had forgotten their mission and the crew had regressed to an agricultural society that adopted a weird religion based on worshipping a deity called Jordan (a Jordan Foundation helped fund and build the ship). While obviously the people on the Snowpiercer weren't that far gone due to being on the train for just two decades (compared to Orphans' ~1000 years), the Wilford worship and the kid's school scene reminded me of the culture depicted in the book a lot, especially with how there were people who had only known the vehicle as their world their whole lives. And yes, Song's first few lines (which went unsubtitled if I remember correctly) were hilarious, as was the translator's failure to pick it up. Speaking of which, I also really liked how the translator machines worked, they more or less perfectly picked up on nuance and intent in a way that no mechanical translator really can but that's perfectly fine, because they're just a device to provide communication through a language barrier and Bong makes no attempt to pretend otherwise. I especially liked the scene where Curtis and Minsoo have their talk right before Wilford's room, and initially the machine is translating their words but at some point you stop hearing it in the background, and they're just talking to each other without that artificial delay between sentences, and that's great.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2013 09:34
|
|
|
A friend of mine brought this question up in conversation recently: are there any films about about the world of Korean pop music or Korean celebrities? Specifically, something incisive or dark, like Perfect Blue except Korean, but anything in that realm would be helpful too.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2013 05:32
|
|
|
I watched PAJU tonight. Interesting subplot about the redevelopment issues going on (maybe some of you in Korea remember the redevelopment protests going on at Yongsan a couple years ago). The movie as a whole was meh. Also, I'd like to mention TAXI BLUES - a documentary that's not well done, but very interesting, about being a taxi driver in Seoul. Another documentary is SHOCKING FAMILY - about how poo poo it is to be a woman/child in Korea. Again, not very well done, but very interesting.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2013 13:08
|
|
|
CharlieFoxtrot posted:A friend of mine brought this question up in conversation recently: are there any films about about the world of Korean pop music or Korean celebrities? Specifically, something incisive or dark, like Perfect Blue except Korean, but anything in that realm would be helpful too. Let's Go To Rose Motel is pretty dark and incisive. However, it is not a movie you should watch under any circumstances, as it is terrible. Fortunately, it won't be available in English for several months, if ever, so you won't be able to ignore my advice unless you're reading this thread from the future. Beyond that your best bet would probably be 200 Pounds Beauty, which has a pretty healthy dose of cynicism regarding the industry even though genre-wise it's a romantic comedy. You might also get some mileage out of Born To Sing, which depicts the only cultural event in Korea considered to get people into the celebrity world out of merit. Everything else is pretty open about the fact that its an industry that involves shady wheelings and dealings.  Speaking of professions that Korean film is cynical towards, Public Enemy depicts rear end in a top hat cop Officer Kang as he beats the crap out of every annoying person he meets. And it's pretty easy to piss off Officer Kang so he mostly just beats up everyone who isn't a cop. The movie's story arc isn't about him becoming a decent human being, surprisingly enough, but about him slowly coming to realize that he should be using his powers off rear end-kickery on people who actually deserve it instead of whoever he happens to run into on a bad day. It's kind of like Lethal Weapon meets The Wire, except the closest we get to sympathetic characters are the morally neutral ones.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2013 04:58
|
|
|
Thanks for the recommendations. While on the topic of specific aspects of Korean pop culture, are there any films that feature Starcraft or e-sports as part of the plot? I remember seeing a Chinese film about Warcraft III where the Korean team were the villains; considering pro gaming is big over there I'd think that there would be at least one film that touches on it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2013 07:50
|
|
|
Can anyone recommend me some Kim Ki-Duk films? I loved Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter ... Spring, wasn't too crazy about Pieta and thought Bad Guy was a mixed bag but at least interesting.
Illinois Smith fucked around with this message at 12:22 on Aug 29, 2013 |
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2013 10:43
|
|
|
Illinois Smith posted:Can anyone recommend me some Kim Ki-Duk films? I loved Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter ... Spring, wasn't too crazy about Pieta and thought Bad Guy was a mixed bag but at least interesting. Samaria is interesting in a teenage hooker kind of way. The Isle is interesting in a disturbing way. I think Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter ... Spring was probably his most mainstreamly accessible movie.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2013 12:59
|
|
|
3 Iron is amazing.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2013 14:12
|
|
|
LooKMaN posted:3 Iron is amazing. really? I found it to be one of his shittiest "What the gently caress did I just watch?" movies. The original name is "Empty House", which is more appropriate at least
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2013 15:06
|
|
|
I enjoyed 3-Iron. Time is also pretty good, I thought, and both of them are pretty accessible, especially compared to Samaria. Can't compare them to Spring, Summer... because I haven't seen it yet. That's about the extent of my Kim Ki-Duk knowledge.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2013 16:51
|
|
|
I found Time to be a huge social commentary on the ubiquity of plastic surgery in Korea.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2013 17:29
|
|
|
3-Iron is by far his best. One of my favorite movies.
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2013 00:33
|
|
|
ladron posted:I found Time to be a huge social commentary on the ubiquity of plastic surgery in Korea. Time is legitimately my favorite movie of all time, because I saw it as going way deeper than that. The film isn't a criticism of the institution of plastic surgery, but rather of the deeper social underpinnings that cause people to want it in the first place. The two main characters are genuinely incapable of understanding what the value of their relationship in terms aside from the tangible, because their entire understanding of themselves is built on the understanding that the essential aspect of themselves is not their minds, but rather their body. And when they finally manage to figure out that the emotional stuff is what really matters, it just turns into an entirely different game of emotional one-upsmanship that still uses plastic surgery as the instrumental plot device. I think that's what makes it such a strong statement- plastic surgery is just the weak salve the characters try to use to repair the emotional balance caused by the expectations of modern culture. If plastic surgery did not exist, they would almost certainly just find a different way to test, prove, and rationalize their love that would be every bit as destructive because their entire conceptualization of the concept is based on destructive social mores. It's not even a directly Korean movie in that sense- Americans have extremely similar body image issues, and the film appealed strongly to my background in Women's Studies. It's another reason why I have trouble understanding how Kim Ki-Duk is attacked as a misogynist. Oh yeah, Moebius is coming out soon. There's a press screening today, but I'm probably not going since it's low priority for my target audience and I'm covering a retrospective on Korean horror right now. Supposedly it will be "the most controversial work of Kim Ki-duk circling a destructive family while questioning one's basic sexual desires." Some Guy TT fucked around with this message at 02:19 on Aug 30, 2013 |
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2013 02:16
|
|
|
For anyone who's on the fence about watching Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter...and Spring, or just wants to remember how great that movie looked, here is a pretty excellent collage of the film's camerawork, divided into the five seasons. Mild spoilers inside, but nothing that really ruins any of the more important, less predictable storyline developments. Pisces is a film about the subtleties in actual human relationships that are not normally well-captured on film because they they don't conform well to traditional narrative structure. This is a deliberately super-slow movie that substitutes definite dramatic moments for very gradual building ones. The relationship between the two leads completely changes throughout the film, but it's hard to say when exactly. A lot of film and narrative conventions are challenged here in ways that will almost certainly make you feel uncomfortable. I give this one a very high personal recommendation.
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2013 04:27
|
|
|
So...did anybody like the previous set of pictures? Well, if you did, here's a bunch more from The King and the Clown. As an added bonus, a visual distillation of that entire film into a single image: Makes you wonder why the film suddenly turns all green, doesn't it?  Epitaph is a horror movie that takes place in a Japanese colonial era hospital. It's more of an omnibus film than anything linked by a solid framing device. There are three basic mysteries all localized within the environemnt that end up taking very weird directions. This is an actually scary movie, even while it does have some clear pretensions, it uses a lot of scare imagery than is genuinely creepy and frightening. Know what's even scarier than an angry ghost? A friendly ghost.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2013 06:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 02:09 |
|
|
Some Guy TT posted:
I'm curious on your perspective on this Some Guy, is South Korean horror not really being made anymore or does it just seem like that outside of the country? For a period there, it seemed like they were endless, I'm guessing brought on by the success of the larger Asian horror wave with such films like Ju-On and Ringu, but I haven't seen a paranormal SK horror movie in a while. I'd imagine I Saw the Devil and Bedevilled could be called horror, but the focus seems to have shifted away from ghosts, are people just tired of those films, or does it just seem that way because they're not getting international attention anymore?
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2013 14:41
|
|
