|
Pistol_Pete posted:I struggle to read 19th century handwriting, let alone the uncoordinated scratchings of people writing with quills, in their own private idea of shorthand and with a cheerful disregard for spelling and punctuation. I'm constantly amazed at how the British built an empire when none of the higher ups could write a legible letter. I could rant about penmanship in the Edwardian Royal Navy for probably hours. EDIT: That's not even getting into Fraktur, which was too Germanic for Hitler. Vincent Van Goatse fucked around with this message at 06:43 on Mar 29, 2017 |
# ? Mar 29, 2017 06:38 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 22:06 |
|
Vincent Van Goatse posted:itsamazingtomehowpeoplewentforcenturieswithoutpunctuationmarksofanykindexceptthosedotsthatsometimesgotshovedinbetweenromansquarecapitalsseriouslyidontgethowthatshitwaslegiblebutthatsprobablymy20thcenturymindsfault It occurs to me that you could have saved a lot of space by omitting most of the vowels.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2017 06:41 |
|
Pistol_Pete posted:I struggle to read 19th century handwriting, let alone the uncoordinated scratchings of people writing with quills, in their own private idea of shorthand and with a cheerful disregard for spelling and punctuation. my dudes' spelling blows though HEY GUNS fucked around with this message at 06:51 on Mar 29, 2017 |
# ? Mar 29, 2017 06:46 |
|
"Now I'm all about Germanic poo poo, it's basically my entire schtik, but this Fraktur business is just taking things way too far" -Adolf "Literally" Hitler
|
# ? Mar 29, 2017 11:09 |
|
there was actually a nazi/nazi slapfight about whether or not to adopt latin writing (german for non-fraktur)
|
# ? Mar 29, 2017 11:25 |
|
lol just lol if you all think fraktur is bad. Children, let me tell you about motherfucking Sütterlin. . . . (also deep sixed by Hitler, something that I am honestly grateful to him for. That was a diabolically broken clock that happened to be right that once).
|
# ? Mar 29, 2017 12:53 |
|
HEY GAIL posted:there was actually a nazi/nazi slapfight about whether or not to adopt latin writing (german for non-fraktur) Yeah, it's actually a really fascinating example of where fascist modernism ran face first into fascist love of traditional culture.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2017 12:54 |
|
Cyrano4747 posted:lol just lol if you all think fraktur is bad.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2017 13:43 |
Pistol_Pete posted:I struggle to read 19th century handwriting, let alone the uncoordinated scratchings of people writing with quills, in their own private idea of shorthand and with a cheerful disregard for spelling and punctuation. My thesis research materials:
|
|
# ? Mar 29, 2017 16:08 |
|
Cyrano4747 posted:lol just lol if you all think fraktur is bad. I just looked this up and how the sweet everloving gently caress is this supposed to be read and why would you do it?
|
# ? Mar 29, 2017 18:36 |
|
Allow me to tell you about Arabic calligraphy
|
# ? Mar 29, 2017 20:41 |
|
Meanwhile in the late 11th c... (Eat poo poo idiots who study illegible writing) Also notice the "et"s that're more or less in the shape of a modern ampersand.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2017 23:13 |
|
Rodrigo Diaz posted:Meanwhile in the late 11th c... (Eat poo poo idiots who study illegible writing) Is that a result of writing being done exclusively by trained professional writers?
|
# ? Mar 30, 2017 02:18 |
|
RabidWeasel posted:I just looked this up and how the sweet everloving gently caress is this supposed to be read and why would you do it? It's basically super fast writing cursive.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2017 03:17 |
|
It's a different writing system that you read significantly differently from plain ol' letter printing, but if you're educated about it and used to it, you'll be able to deal with it. That's half the reason they teach cursive in schools, not necessarily so kids will pick it up as a faster way to write, but so they'll just be able to read other people's handwriting. At least in theory. I still can only barely read cursive.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2017 03:25 |
|
Cyrano4747 posted:It's basically super fast writing cursive.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2017 03:26 |
|
Splode posted:Is that a result of writing being done exclusively by trained professional writers? That certainly helps compared to post-medieval writing, but even in the middle ages there was some goofy crap going on eg https://twitter.com/DJMHarland/status/833267673748369412 Shits as bad as Russian cursive Edit: I'll point out it's not *exclusive*. We have my namesake's signature for example, which is in the standard style of the time Rodrigo Diaz fucked around with this message at 04:55 on Mar 30, 2017 |
# ? Mar 30, 2017 04:50 |
|
I've been really interested in the collapse of the Carolingians lately, but I've been having trouble finding very good sources on the topic. I'm particularly interested in the last few rulers in Germany: Charles the Fat, Arnaulf, Louis the Child, Berengar, etc. All the weird, crazy pre-Heinrich the Fowler chaos. Does anyone, by chance, have any books they can recommend? I know it's a tough topic to cover, given that there aren't many primary sources, but hey, I figured someone might know here.Rodrigo Diaz posted:Shits as bad as Russian cursive It's funny, my Russian has atrophied, but I can write in Russian cursive easier than I can write in English, and CERTAINLY better than Russian block letters. My hands are Dr. Strange-level unsteady though.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2017 09:03 |
|
Majorian posted:
Ok but can other people read it?
|
# ? Mar 30, 2017 12:12 |
|
Rodrigo Diaz posted:Ok but can other people read it? Surprisingly, yes, for people who can read Russian. That's definitely not the case with my 3rd-grade level penmanship in English. Very weird.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2017 15:54 |
|
Majorian posted:I've been really interested in the collapse of the Carolingians lately, but I've been having trouble finding very good sources on the topic. I'm particularly interested in the last few rulers in Germany: Charles the Fat, Arnaulf, Louis the Child, Berengar, etc. All the weird, crazy pre-Heinrich the Fowler chaos. Does anyone, by chance, have any books they can recommend? I know it's a tough topic to cover, given that there aren't many primary sources, but hey, I figured someone might know here. Check out Simon MacLean's Kingship and Politics in the Late Ninth Century, which is a very good full-length study of Charles the Fat's reign. The relevant chapters in Timothy Reuter's Germany in the Early Middle Ages and Matthew Innes et al.'s The Carolingian World should also have more brief but still good summaries of this period. MacLean has also done an English translation of Regino of Prum, one of the main narrative sources for this period. There are also English translations of the Annals of Fulda and the Annals of St. Bertin, which cover late into the ninth century. HEY GAIL posted:i like my chill handwriting bros, they're cool Don't get me wrong, I love paleographers! Also, I think Roman cursive is weirdly legible when you get the hang of it. The Merovingian scripts are hellish though. deadking fucked around with this message at 16:30 on Mar 30, 2017 |
# ? Mar 30, 2017 16:23 |
|
deadking posted:Check out Simon MacLean's Kingship and Politics in the Late Ninth Century, which is a very good full-length study of Charles the Fat's reign. The relevant chapters in Timothy Reuter's Germany in the Early Middle Ages and Matthew Innes et al.'s The Carolingian World should also have more brief but still good summaries of this period. MacLean has also done an English translation of Regino of Prum, one of the main narrative sources for this period. There are also English translations of the Annals of Fulda and the Annals of St. Bertin, which cover late into the ninth century. Wow, that's terrific! Definitely more than I was expecting to get. Thanks! I've been particularly trying to get a better handle on Berengar of Friuli. What a weird figure. Most historians seem to think he was terrible at everything he did, but I'm not so sure...dude had to have some skill to survive as a major power player for as long as he did. (before, you know, being captured and executed) I also love that his wars with Arnaulf and the Guideschi was the background for the Corpse Synod.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2017 17:14 |
|
Majorian posted:I've been particularly trying to get a better handle on Berengar of Friuli. What a weird figure. Most historians seem to think he was terrible at everything he did, but I'm not so sure...dude had to have some skill to survive as a major power player for as long as he did. (before, you know, being captured and executed) I also love that his wars with Arnaulf and the Guideschi was the background for the Corpse Synod. Berengar has my respect just out of sheer staying power. After all the poo poo he went through to get to the top, getting his army slaughtered by the Magyars and still hanging on for another quarter century is some pretty impressive work. I suspect his reputation is a casualty of Ottonian-era writers like Liutprand, whose basic point of view was that post-Carolingian Italy was an unrelenting parade of the incompetent, unfortunate, and accursed until Otto rolled up on the place.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2017 03:18 |
|
OK, I am playing Great Whale Road and Expeditions: Vikings. They're both set... mostly in Denmark when Christianity was not the popular choice yet and raiding the English wasn't a popular past time. How likely was woman to become a warrior or a clan leader (thegn?), huscarl or some other professional shitkicker? Because GWL starts with you choosing your char out of a brother and sister, the other becoming your party member (the woman is the better soldier). Meanwhile, EV gives you a childhood friend party member who is handy with a spear. You fight women warriors quite often I think (the models don't stand out that much) and one of your/other thegns deffo has a female huscarl. I legit have no clue.
|
# ? Apr 15, 2017 17:52 |
|
JcDent posted:OK, I am playing Great Whale Road and Expeditions: Vikings. They're both set... mostly in Denmark when Christianity was not the popular choice yet and raiding the English wasn't a popular past time. E:V's out?
|
# ? Apr 15, 2017 22:33 |
|
Nope. Just checked myself. Was the conquistador one good?
|
# ? Apr 16, 2017 04:35 |
|
Cyrano4747 posted:Nope. Just checked myself. I quite enjoyed it. Very interesting from a setting perspective, written well enough, and nice tactical combat that isn't afraid to be a game and does interesting things with it.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2017 05:18 |
|
I'm a game reviewer, it has certain perks. I now know that there's an ootion to play in English, but with norse names, so you have Vjolholl or smth everywhere. Now pls address my question.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2017 08:02 |
|
JcDent posted:I'm a game reviewer, it has certain perks. I now know that there's an ootion to play in English, but with norse names, so you have Vjolholl or smth everywhere. So the time period you're talking about (500-800) is very murky historically, and I'm working from vaguely remembered commentary from someone else. while female warriors would have existed within that culture and time period, the number of them probably numbered in the dozens, not the hundreds. Rodrigo Diaz fucked around with this message at 23:08 on Apr 16, 2017 |
# ? Apr 16, 2017 23:04 |
|
Rodrigo Diaz posted:So the time period you're talking about (500-800) is very murky historically, and I'm working from vaguely remembered commentary from someone else. while female warriors would have existed within that culture and time period, the number of them probably numbered in the dozens, not the hundreds. Well, half of my hird is now female. I gave one of them the cheap, cheap "Sexist" trait which somehow translates into 10% more damage against the opposite sex! E:V is set in 750s or something.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2017 10:00 |
|
JcDent posted:How likely was woman to become a warrior or a clan leader (thegn?), huscarl or some other professional shitkicker? Because GWL starts with you choosing your char out of a brother and sister, the other becoming your party member (the woman is the better soldier). Meanwhile, EV gives you a childhood friend party member who is handy with a spear. You fight women warriors quite often I think (the models don't stand out that much) and one of your/other thegns deffo has a female huscarl. It's unclear. References to women bearing arms are common in mythological sagas and lays, but rare in 'historical' sagas (which aren't considered historically accurate but take place in an identifiable historical time). All sources, mythological and historical, were written in the middle ages at a time when women fighting was fairly taboo, so there may have been some filtering. There also appears to be a lot of Scandinavian mitochondrial dna scattered around the world, suggesting that women were voyaging and colonising alongside men, whether or no they fought.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2017 10:26 |
|
Mr Enderby posted:
Blonde, fair-skinned, blue-eyed female slaves would have been a curiosity around the world.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 00:44 |
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2017 12:16 |
|
Sex ed sure has come a long way.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2017 12:38 |
|
Greggster posted:Sex ed sure has come a long way.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2017 13:11 |
|
Anyone have a good recommendation for books on how medieval warfare was conducted? I know bits and pieces but I'd like to get an overview
|
# ? May 1, 2017 01:57 |
|
one eyed, one beard, flying textual penis creature
|
# ? May 1, 2017 02:10 |
|
HEY GAIL posted:one eyed, one beard, flying textual penis creature your not supposed to sign you're post's
|
# ? May 1, 2017 02:12 |
|
JaucheCharly posted:Music ed too I don't know man, this is how music ed was (kinda) like it for me.
|
# ? May 1, 2017 02:37 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 22:06 |
|
JcDent posted:Well, half of my hird is now female. I gave one of them the cheap, cheap "Sexist" trait which somehow translates into 10% more damage against the opposite sex! So this was nagging at me and I did some more reading and came across this: https://books.google.com/books?id=X...epage&q&f=false which generally seems to line up with what I half-remembered. this is also interesting and semi-related https://academic.oup.com/ehr/article/doi/10.1093/ehr/cex066/3738045/The-Earliest-Viking-Activity-in-England Rodrigo Diaz fucked around with this message at 03:13 on May 1, 2017 |
# ? May 1, 2017 03:09 |