|
Levantine posted:Is it me or does his head look too large for the armor? In some behind the scenes thing, they talk about how the CGI Iron Man's waist and head are too small to be a real person, because if they made it realistic proportions it just looked too bulky. Also: 
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2013 05:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 09:45 |
|
|
wyoming posted:In some behind the scenes thing, they talk about how the CGI Iron Man's waist and head are too small to be a real person, because if they made it realistic proportions it just looked too bulky. This makes me want to see what Iron Man looks like without CGI. Just an hour and a half of RDJ running around pointing his open palm at things.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2013 05:32
|
|
|
User-Friendly posted:This makes me want to see what Iron Man looks like without CGI. Just an hour and a half of RDJ running around pointing his open palm at things. Fox learned the wrong lessons from Origins: Wolverine, 'theatrical cut sans effects' would be the best special feature ever.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2013 07:23
|
|
|
Rhyno posted:Jesus Christ, there are other loving midgets out there Hollywood! But... Peter Dinklage is loving awesome. I see no problem here whatsoever.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2013 08:50
|
|
|
SnakesRevenge posted:Fox learned the wrong lessons from Origins: Wolverine, 'theatrical cut sans effects' would be the best special feature ever. I would legitimately love this feature on all movies. Like even just a 30 minute clip with no effects at all with all the markers/stripped down costumes etc. Kinda would make you appreciate everything else, or if not at leas the pure acting ability.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2013 08:55
|
|
|
There are a fair number of effects heavy movies have small snippets like that where the build the scene from raw footage to stand in effects to the final product.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2013 09:00
|
|
|
Rhyno posted:"Iron Patriot" is a really stupid name. It's not possible to top WAR MACHINE. In the comics it makes sense at least as its Norman Osbournes utterly cynical attempt at superheroing, which makes me wonder where its going in IM3.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2013 11:54
|
|
|
massive spider posted:In the comics it makes sense at least as its Norman Osbourne's utterly cynical attempt at superheroing, which makes me wonder where its going in IM3. The US military's shameless propaganda?
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2013 11:58
|
|
|
Maxwell Lord posted:But... Peter Dinklage is loving awesome. I see no problem here whatsoever. I actually hope they don't cast him as puck. If people can say a black spiderman would work, why can't he play any role? Have him play a character and never even make it a point that he is a dwarf. The man is a great actor and should not only be given parts that are for dwarfs. Make him the main villain. In a world where people can shoot lasers out of their face, physical size would not be a that important to establish he is a threat.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2013 14:32
|
|
|
Is the Iron Patriot thing from the comics? I actually like the name over War Machine because it actually seems like a euphenism the military would use, like "Operation Iraqi Freedom."
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2013 15:35
|
|
|
CopywrightMMXI posted:Is the Iron Patriot thing from the comics? I actually like the name over War Machine because it actually seems like a euphenism the military would use, like "Operation Iraqi Freedom." Yes he is from the comics. When Norman Osborn became the director of SHIELD due to Secret Invasion he decided to create his own Avengers. He was Iron Patriot, (a mix of Iron Man and Cap and wearing Iron Man armor, Spider-man (Scorpion Venom), Hawkeye (Bullseye) Ms Marvel (Moonstone), and Wolverine (Wolverine's son, don't ask)
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2013 16:15
|
|
|
Wolverine's son is like the least surprising character ever, of course he'd have a kid he doesn't want anything to do with.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2013 16:50
|
|
|
bobkatt013 posted:Yes he is from the comics. When Norman Osborn became the director of SHIELD due to Secret Invasion he decided to create his own Avengers. He was Iron Patriot, (a mix of Iron Man and Cap and wearing Iron Man armor, Spider-man (Scorpion Venom), Hawkeye (Bullseye) Ms Marvel (Moonstone), and Wolverine (Wolverine's son, don't ask)  This. It was pretty nifty and entertaining. That's a heavy hitting team.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2013 16:59
|
|
|
Gatts posted:
Er, so who was powerful enough to be "Sentry"?
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2013 17:00
|
|
|
Mechafunkzilla posted:Er, so who was powerful enough to be "Sentry"? The Void
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2013 17:02
|
|
|
Mechafunkzilla posted:Er, so who was powerful enough to be "Sentry"? He was essentially controlled and in check for the most part by Norman but always on the verge of losing it until the climax when he when something like a third form final fantasy end boss.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2013 17:05
|
|
|
bobkatt013 posted:The Void Heh. Makes sense.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2013 17:10
|
|
|
The funny thing about Peter Dinklage is that he's typecast as the guy who's cranky about the ways dwarfs are typecasted.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2013 17:28
|
|
|
Supercar Gautier posted:The funny thing about Peter Dinklage is that he's typecast as the guy who's cranky about the ways dwarfs are typecasted. Well, it was his first role: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4je71Tz_9IE
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2013 18:18
|
|
|
It's a small thing, but I love Peter Dinklage because he seems like he's the best celebrity dog owner solely by the virtue of the fact that there are a ton of pictures of him walking it and it's a no-bullshit breed instead of a showy purebred. Good dog, good dog owner 
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2013 18:22
|
|
|
...of SCIENCE! posted:It's a small thing,  Ryan Gosling seems like a cool dog owner too, he carries it everywhere. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2013 20:27
|
|
|
So hey, to all of you (okay just Rhyno) freaking out about the fact that that article said that Dinklage is playing Puck, looks like they were wrong, and just assumed. Variety is reporting that he is going to play the film's main antagonist. gently caress yes.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2013 02:27
|
|
|
He's going to be Apocalypse isn't he.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2013 04:15
|
|
|
Oh my god, there is nothing about Peter Dinklage being the antagonist in an X-Men move that doesn't sound awesome.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2013 04:22
|
|
|
Liar Lyre posted:There are a fair number of effects heavy movies have small snippets like that where the build the scene from raw footage to stand in effects to the final product. There's a feature-length documentary, like nearly an hour and a half long, on the Star Wars: Episode III DVD about how much work went into a 60-second sequence during the climactic lightsaber battle. It's pretty awesome.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2013 04:32
|
|
|
Yea! Dinklage is a great actor so there's no way he'll do bad no matter who they cast. My crazy theory: Mojo!
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2013 04:43
|
|
|
Days of Future Past didn't really have a main villain, but I guess closest would be Nimrod.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2013 04:49
|
|
|
jscolon2.0 posted:Days of Future Past didn't really have a main villain, but I guess closest would be Nimrod. So he's the most advanced Sentinel (Mutant Terminator) ever created.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2013 04:50
|
|
|
GonSmithe posted:So hey, to all of you (okay just Rhyno) freaking out about the fact that that article said that Dinklage is playing Puck, looks like they were wrong, and just assumed. Can he play Modok? That would be cool.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2013 04:57
|
|
|
A human heart posted:Can he play Modok? That would be cool. No, MODOK still has his rights with Marvel. MODOKs are never primarily X-men characters.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2013 05:00
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:No, MODOK still has his rights with Marvel. MODOKs are never primarily X-men characters. Also AIM is going to be in Iron Man 3
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2013 05:02
|
|
|
One of the cool things about Find Me Guilty was that Dinklage was Diesel's lawyer and apart from having a dude silently put a lectern up so that, presumably, Dinklage could look at the jury at eye level the fact that he's a dwarf is never mentioned even when the prosecutor if flipping his poo poo that all the mobsters are going to get off. It's based on a real story so I don't know if that guy was really a dwarf or if they just loved Dinklage and were like 'gently caress it it's my movie.'
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2013 08:16
|
|
|
Dinklage could also be voicing a predominantly CG character.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2013 09:20
|
|
|
When I first read about Dinklage being cast I instantly thought 'Arcade', no idea why. He doesn't fit into Days of Future Past at all though, so now I'm left wondering if Dinklage will be Gambit?
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2013 14:30
|
|
|
January Jones was hands-down the worst part of First Class so I can only hope that Dinklage will be picking up the role of Emma Frost.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2013 15:16
|
|
|
My favorite pet theory is Mr. Sinister, which I feel like Dinklage could knock out of the goddamn park.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2013 17:13
|
|
|
Gatts posted:
I love this because everyone is pretending to be someone else, except Ares. Thor? Bah, I'm Ares 
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2013 17:46
|
|
|
well why not posted:Dinklage could also be voicing a predominantly CG character. Aww yeh 
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2013 18:24
|
|
|
enigma105 posted:I love this because everyone is pretending to be someone else, except Ares. Thor? Bah, I'm Ares Ares in the Marvel Universe is incredible. He is even better when he is dealing with his brother Hercules.    If only they would make an Incredible Hercules movie
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2013 19:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 09:45 |
|
|
It's kind of funny how the character progressed from the start. The Hood had a different theme to him compared to what Bendis turned him into and Ares' first story was about a Father and his Son and Ares making a life in the modern world. On the other hand I think Greg Pak is fantastic (I do believe that's his characterization in those panels).
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2013 20:26
|
|