|
The fuckers banned me for being a polite Muslim. I only wanted to say that Islam isn't a religion of terrorism 
|
#
¿
Feb 26, 2013 04:40
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 24, 2024 11:25 |
|
|
Nice Davis posted:Is that chatroom visible to everyone TPC'er watching the feed, or is it something you set up while a bunch of goons watched? Cause it looks like there isn't a single real person in there. That chatroom is visible to everyone and yea it was mostly goons making GBS threads it up. I'm pretty sure they started getting moderators in because I kept on just cursing to myself until others joined in. They don't like me 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 26, 2013 23:31
|
|
|
There's nothing I can say about this  
|
|
#
¿
Feb 27, 2013 02:06
|
|
|
CommieGIR posted:Care to expand upon what they are saying? As a bio-diesel maker, my interest is now peaked at how wrong they are. I pulled it all out of my rear end basically. I said you could get it from grass clippings and such. Edit: Looking it up I apparently mixed up Bioalcohols with Biodiesel. I was trying to say that you just needed the cellulose from plants but they hung up on me.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 28, 2013 21:05
|
|
|
Well I burned my account by posting porn and disgusting images. It's not how I wanted to go down but I was sick of the blatant racism, sexism, ignorance and their refusal to have any sort of differing ideas posed to them. Present facts and figures disproving them and they call you a troll and block you. It's a bunch of immature adults who can't handle the idea that people think differently than them and throw tantrums when someone doesn't fit their reality. I tried being an rear end in a top hat but that only gained me more shithead friends on there. Andrew Jackson lasted for quite a while and it's amazing how stupid the mods and Selaty family are. NOTE TO TEA PARTY DIPSHITS READING THIS. I AM NOT SA AND DO NOT REPRESENT THEM. MY ACTIONS ARE MY OWN AND ARE NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PEOPLE HERE.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 2, 2013 02:47
|
|
|
I don't feel bad about pornbombing them earlier today. I also can't keep accounts for long anymore 
Cowman fucked around with this message at 06:59 on Mar 2, 2013 |
|
#
¿
Mar 2, 2013 06:57
|
|
|
Radio Paranoia posted:Did you write that? It's probably the best way to explain the whole tea party ideology to the layman, but TPC members will probably just stick their fingers in their ears again. Yea, I wrote it all and the response was about what you'd think. Being called a troll, bigot and idiot was most of the replies.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 2, 2013 16:45
|
|
|
Mafic Cloud posted:I don't see it that way. I see SA trying to make TPC see themselves for what they really are. I see SA poking fun at them. What I see here is a lot of educated, intelligent people with the ability to think for themselves and have the brainpower to see the racist, hypocritical, and immoral garbage spewing from the toxic waste site known as TPC. It should be listed as one of the EPA's Superfund sites. I was on the site for two weeks (thinking that the worst of them were in the minority), tried to make them see themselves the way SA does, and decided they never would take their blinders off. There is absolutely nothing wrong with being a conservative as long as you can logically back up your beliefs with facts and data. Saying that gun control is bad because it takes away our freedom doesn't mean anything because there isn't any quantifiable proof of what you're saying. Extrapolating that into "Gun control is bad because it takes away our freedom to own weapons and has been proven to not work in cases like X, Y and Z" is a much better argument. You can actually discuss this point because there is content there to discuss. I personally believe that you can hold whatever belief you want, no matter how much I disagree with it, and I will respect it if you can defend it. The lack of defense or willingness to defend shows a weakness in your argument and in your comprehension of the subject. You also should be able to admit when you're wrong like a mature adult. I'm not saying you did any of this, either positive or negative, but don't think that SA is anti-conservative or anything. SA is anti-idiot and anti-ignorance if anything. You also signed up on my 7th year "anniversary" of being here 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 2, 2013 19:47
|
|
|
In looking through my old images folder, I found this. Someone on SA made it way back and it's pretty much true. Edit: They Live is an awesome movie and if you haven't seen it then go watch it right now.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 3, 2013 00:57
|
|
|
Dees fits in so perfectly there, I wonder when we'll start seeing his anti-Zionism stuff 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 3, 2013 17:34
|
|
|
insert_funny posted:
They've been actively posting David Dees pictures so it's not a surprise that they would post that.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 6, 2013 20:13
|
|
|
harlequin baby posted:Post some lipstick lesbian model types on the global feed, and I bet you they come out of the woodwork with "Likes". It's hilarious how true this is.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 6, 2013 23:57
|
|
|
Who the hell was dumb enough to post child porn? I know no one here would do that but my god people, we have standards*. Don't do anything illegal for christ's sake *Standards being gay porn, scat, goatse, vomiting and a host of other fetishes ranging from disgusting to weird. VVV Someone also might have posted those "Barely Legal" type of photos where young looking legal porn stars dress up as kids for legal creepiness VVV Cowman fucked around with this message at 17:38 on Mar 9, 2013 |
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2013 17:32
|
|
|
Mister Bates posted:Wouldn't $25,000 worth of video games basically be every video game ever made? With the depreciation in value of most games, especially big names like GTA, $25,000 of video games is a hell of a lot. If you're basing it on the original price rather than current market value then that's a little less than 417 games bought at $60 apiece. At the time of the shooting Adam Lanza was 20 years 35 weeks and 5 days old. In total he lived 7,555 days (5 extra due to leap years) and so he spent $3.31 a day on video games throughout his life. He would have bought .06 games a day or 20.15 games a year his entire life. Considering he probably didn't get to buy games until his teens, he would have had to buy a significantly larger amount per year to make up the difference. I doubt he had anywhere near that many games in such a short time, and if he did he wouldn't have had time to play them.  I felt like sperging out ok?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2013 21:49
|
|
|
etalian posted:They are the same nuts who think paying IRS taxes is not mandatory. They also will deny the existence of the laws even if you show them the exact law and exact wording of the law. It's not that they're willfully ignorant, it's that they literally refuse to pay taxes and make up and latch onto any rationale to support them.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2013 22:15
|
|
|
Shut up about the Hijabs, some women wear them voluntarily because they see it as a sign of respect to Allah, the same way that some Jews wear the yarmulkes as a sign of respect to God. Jesus, go back to mocking Tea Partiers.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 12, 2013 19:44
|
|
|
HappilyDeranged posted:I think they're saying that he ignores real problems in favor of silly poo poo like trying to ban soda. Because elected officials can only care about one thing at a time. Do they seriously have a word filter for Obama -> nobama? That's hilariously stupid.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 14, 2013 16:59
|
|
|
Captain Backslap posted:Stop using this phrase until you know what it means. You only know half of the definition. It's the correct usage of the phrase.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 16, 2013 22:28
|
|
|
The common colloquial definition of cognitive dissonance is just holding contradictory ideas. It's not wrong to use it this way since the psychological definition just needs the psychological discomfort. Technically it's not entirely cognitive dissonance without the discomfort but everyone understands that it's just about holding two contradictory ideas. The psychological discomfort doesn't even have to be conscious, you can subtly change your behavior and beliefs to rationalize the cognitive dissonance.The Dictionary posted:Colloquial adj. Cowman fucked around with this message at 22:49 on Mar 16, 2013 |
|
#
¿
Mar 16, 2013 22:45
|
|
|
Mitchicon posted:Anyone have the "States Rights Can Go Suck It" Lincoln picture?  Edit: Put this in the OP 
Cowman fucked around with this message at 23:19 on Mar 18, 2013 |
|
#
¿
Mar 18, 2013 23:16
|
|
|
Hey Tom I'm one of the Ops for the IRC, send me $100 and I'll let you in and I won't ban you. You can be a spy and secret undercover dude like James Bond but less British and more fascistic.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 19, 2013 21:28
|
|
|
Hey Tom since you're reading this thread tell hacker Joe that rape isn't cool and shouldn't be joked about. Oh and I'm also totally an angry teenager who's just rebelling, that's literally the only reason I joined the site and am a dirty liberal. Maybe one day I'll grow old and be as bitter and hate filled as TPC
|
|
#
¿
Mar 20, 2013 00:18
|
|
|
Paradox Personified posted:They'll just take this as a reason to like it more. If a liberal hates it, gotta knee-jerk love it; and vice versa. Rape isn't a political thing. If you have any empathy or care about other people at all you should be against rape and making light of rape. It isn't politics, it's being a decent person. Rape being bad isn't partisan you dickheads 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 20, 2013 00:27
|
|
|
Tom you can post here. We won't ban you for being from TPC since we support free speech and differing opinions.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 20, 2013 00:34
|
|
|
Hey "An Angry Hamster" you don't speak in IRC you dumbass, it's all text based.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 20, 2013 01:02
|
|
|
looking.glass.eyes posted:
As far as I know we don't have a TS channel for this, just an IRC. He's talking more poo poo.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 20, 2013 01:31
|
|
|
RockerGawd posted:so im thinking of going as in there as a ultra conservative pretty lady and exposing him for what he is! what do u guys think u think he will bite on it? You're not going to last long here Joe 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 20, 2013 02:09
|
|
|
Guys leave Joe alone, he's obviously a very lonely and sad individual desperate for attention. It's alright Joe, we understand 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 20, 2013 02:19
|
|
|
Wet and ready posted:Joe is back, with new weapons. Hahaha, he thinks he brought undue pressure. Joe you're not the special snowflake you think you are.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 20, 2013 20:50
|
|
|
Hey Tim Jr. since I know you're reading this thread I have a serious thing I would like to say to you. This isn't an insult or a joke so please take it seriously, it isn't about politics either. Taylor Schrembs is mentally deranged in some way. The kid will shoot people and commit murder sometime in the future. Reading his posts makes this blatantly clear to anyone, the kid is not right in the head. He needs to see a psychiatrist before he harms himself or others. Please do everything in your power to notify the proper authorities and help to get him the help he needs. I'm not the only one who thinks this, a large amount of people who are in the IRC as well as the thread believe the same thing. This isn't some sort of "Conservatism is a mental disease"  joke or insult. This is 100% serious. The kid is in serious need of help and should be addressed as such. I don't want to read the headlines in the future of this kid committing a murder and I'm sure you don't either.Edit: For Tim Jr. and others who may not know who this kid is, this post is a pretty clear indicator of what I'm talking about. Cowman fucked around with this message at 21:37 on Mar 21, 2013 |
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2013 21:33
|
|
|
I got two of those emails too! They were sent to the email I used for Joseph Goebbels and I'm happy they want his help  I think this is evidence of where they get the 100,000+ members number from. They still count banned accounts as members and so they inflate the actual number of members of the site. We've helped them pretend to be important 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 22, 2013 17:47
|
|
|
Is the baby even considered white? His name was Antonio Santiago and his father was Luis Santiago, who looks Hispanic or Latino. His mother was white at least.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2013 22:31
|
|
|
zylche posted:We've had enough fun playing with them, PM me for the new channel. Burning the old one was worth it for that fun Please type up a post explaining what happened for those of us who are out of the loop.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2013 17:45
|
|
|
romeo x-ray posted:I'm sincerely not afraid of a fatwa, but on the off-chance some Islamic goons think it's stupid to post, I've got rid of that picture, feel free to do the same, or not. That image has been posted online many times and posters haven't had fatwas called on them. The original artist did but people who post it are safe.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2013 16:23
|
|
|
StandardVC10 posted:What I don't get is how sites like this can just stay angry and outraged about every possible thing. I get like that a lot, but at a certain point I either can't keep finding new things to feel really upset about or I just get tired of it. Between the trolling and TPC's terrible site design and userbase, it seems that there aren't too many people left who want to discuss anything that might invoke positive emotions anymore. The most favored content to share when I was last on the site was the stuff that promoted the most possible anger and hate, it's actually what they want to talk about. I found my next gimmick account. I'm gonna go look up anger management strategies and the effect of anger on a person, psychologically and physically. Gonna start sharing the effects of always being angry to these guys and help them lead a healthier, calmer life.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 1, 2013 01:45
|
|
|
Man they banned my anger management account so fast. All I did was say that some people on the site seem to have anger management issues and posted helpful tips on how to control it. I was just trying to help
|
|
#
¿
Apr 1, 2013 18:21
|
|
|
NoUU posted:Does that mean he's coming back? I don't think we can handle another attack from Joe without completely falling apart. As long as it isn't lovely music I'm pretty sure I can handle it. Pay your child support Joe and stop being such a lovely person/father.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2013 15:33
|
|
|
Hilariously enough, Snopes has proven that myth wrong on their website "Snopes About Us Page posted:The snopes.com web site is (and always has been) a completely independent, self-sufficient entity wholly owned by its operators, Barbara and David Mikkelson, and funded through advertising revenues. Neither the site nor its operators has ever received monies from (or been engaged in any business or editorial relationship with), any sponsor, investor, partner, political party, religious group, business organization, government agency, or any other outside group or organization. Cowman fucked around with this message at 16:15 on Apr 7, 2013 |
|
#
¿
Apr 7, 2013 16:11
|
|
|
etalian posted:So it's pretty much the classic insta-hype signup but the community has no long term legs? February is also about when the forums discovered it. It's kind of funny that they hate us and yet thanks to us they have over 100,000 members (they count banned accounts as members) and any sort of publicity or traffic. There aren't that many legitimate users on that site any more and with the increasing amounts of paranoia, they've been driving away legitimate accounts. Pretty soon it's going to be just the regulars that are always posted here plus the moderators. It pretty much is that but there are a few stragglers. Edit: The OP of the first thread is from Feb. 2nd which aligns with the graph of traffic almost perfectly.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 8, 2013 23:04
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 24, 2024 11:25 |
|
|
Stellardyes if you're still reading the thread contact me and I'll get you situated with SA and the rules. We're a strict community but it's pretty great, don't want you to feel like you've wasted money coming here. Sorry for the paranoia but we've had a lot of TPCers join just to post in this thread and "spy" on us and they usually post in the same manner you did. Edit: If you have IRC I go by the same name as I do here. If not you can contact me at hobofromhell@gmail.com
|
|
#
¿
Apr 9, 2013 17:57
|
|