Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Dirk the Average
Feb 7, 2012

"This may have been a mistake."

Artix posted:

Two reasons: First, the game doesn't tell you a goddamn thing, so you're expected to search every map like there is one, regardless of their presence or not (and a majority of the maps in the game do have one, so that paranoia is warranted). This "blind" experience is the exact thing I'm trying to simulate, and what's the fun in putting up only maps that have monsters?

Second, even when presented with the possibility that there are no monsters on the map, people have guessed 16-6 in favor of there being one. Maybe it's because we're still early, but if that sort of ratio continues throughout the game there won't be that many points given out for no monsters, and in fact, I expect it to decrease when they don't have the supposed benefit of me pointing out there might not be a monster on the map.

At any rate, the update is recorded so submissions are now closed.

On the other hand, if someone wants to game the system, then they should just say that there are no monsters on the map every time (unless it's really obvious that there are). After all, they'll be right ~14 times, and what are the odds of successfully being the one person who gets the location and/or condition correct?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread