|
Mr. Despair posted:All you need to know about the t5i: The digital rev version comparing to the T3i because the T4i is so similar: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNyuP98KO3A
|
#
¿
May 11, 2013 03:46
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 05:46 |
|
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:They've been on sale for over a week: noooo I just saw they have the 40mm f/2.8 for 80 bucks and it's sold out!
|
|
#
¿
May 19, 2013 10:02
|
|
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:Edit: they have it right now for $135 I'm still upset that I missed the 40mm when it was about 100 bucks. What a great deal.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 10, 2013 03:28
|
|
|
ShutteredIn posted:Cool. Which ones aren't? I have this for my T2i which is pretty good: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B006Y0YZZ6/ref=oh_details_o02_s01_i00?ie=UTF8&psc=1 Don't know if they make similar batteries for full frame etc.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 13, 2013 01:27
|
|
|
How is the Rokinon 8mm f/3.5 HD fisheye lens? It's on sale for 225 USD. I've never used fish eye before. It is gimmicky or useful? I tend to shoot more landscapes.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2013 20:04
|
|
|
erephus posted:I've gone through a few cameras by now, 1100D / 100D / 700D / Pentax K-50 / 60D and I'm going to settle with the Canon 60D. You should get a wider angle lens. A good choice is the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 without vc. 50mm and above may make it hard to frame some shots you may want.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2013 13:14
|
|
|
Quantum of Phallus posted:EF 40mm f/2.8 for $136 is a pro buy. It's been lower refurbished in the past. You can get it new at amazon for 140 USD right now.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 3, 2013 01:36
|
|
|
Well I think I'll grab it as I missed the 96 dollar deal on amazon a while back. Edit: Maybe not just yet... Shipping and tax pops it up to 133 USD. I'll wait.
|
|
#
¿
May 4, 2014 21:27
|
|
|
yeah you want to get a zoom that's more wide than 40mm. The 40mm is great for it's size and good optics. Most people recommend the tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 without vibration control. It can be had for 300-500 dollars. It's kind of heavy but it does the job. Only for EF-S mount as on full frame it has vignetting/framing issues. Hear the wide angle primes are pretty great as well.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 23, 2014 17:11
|
|
|
Drunk Badger posted:At what point is that not noticeable? My 18mm doesn't look bad, but I know there's a point where there's too much distortion I don't know what it looks like when you go that low since I don't have a super wide angle lens, but past 17mm downwards, each mm exponentially widens with fov angle. So super drastic change from 10-15mm compared to 35-40mm.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 23, 2014 22:41
|
|
|
I will be going to Iceland sometime soon and I am considering to get an 85mm f/1.8 for my T2i because I hear it's an amazing lens. I know it's used mostly for portraits but I'll likely be walking around cities and the wilderness. How useful is the lens outside of portraits? Is it hard to use for landscapes when I might not have a lot of time to compose a shot?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2015 02:27
|
|
|
Any concerns with buying lenses used from B&H instead of canon?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2015 17:26
|
|
|
For night landscapes would it be worth to use the 16-35 f/4 is or f/2.8? I’m curious how different the bokeh is between the two at night. Planning on renting one or the other for travel and the different filter thread size is a bit annoying since I’d have to invest in some 82mm filters if I want to use the f/2.8.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2018 21:23
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 05:46 |
|
|
InternetJunky posted:For astrophotography it's probably worth it to go for the 2.8. Otherwise, what landscapes are you shooting at f/2.8 at night? Would part body/whole body portrait landscape with night bokeh be unreasonable or would I be better off with a longer focal length? I’m asking about wide angles since I’ve never have used that focal length. I’d be renting first to check it out.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 28, 2018 17:35
|
|