|
Did you not lock the carabiner? What happened?
|
# ¿ May 11, 2013 21:20 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 04:26 |
|
HookShot posted:I'm thinking of buying my mom a DSLR
|
# ¿ May 12, 2013 00:26 |
|
goattrails posted:(the aperture is slightly smaller however).
|
# ¿ May 14, 2013 01:02 |
|
The canons do.
|
# ¿ May 20, 2013 00:34 |
|
Rent a 17-55 or buy a Tamron 17-50 instead.
|
# ¿ May 22, 2013 17:25 |
|
I would go for the 17mm/3.5 TS-E for maximum flexibility.
|
# ¿ May 23, 2013 18:10 |
|
Lightroom can batch-rename on import and export. It's quite flexible.
|
# ¿ May 23, 2013 23:52 |
|
Pretty sure you can always try it for 30 days.
|
# ¿ May 24, 2013 13:36 |
|
Basically, yes. Your mirror box and pentamirror are APS-C sized, so they'll never feel as nice as a film SLR. Electronic viewfinders can be better for this.
|
# ¿ May 29, 2013 15:12 |
|
Marumi super dhg
|
# ¿ May 31, 2013 08:09 |
|
I have an R-strap, for the few times I actually use a strap. The strap itself is good, but the carabiner feels cheap as hell, and its locking isn't serated. E: and the company is a bunch of over-litigious bums.
|
# ¿ Jun 2, 2013 13:10 |
|
If you don't give a poo poo about AF might as well get a 5d2 and spend on (used) glass instead.
|
# ¿ Jun 2, 2013 19:46 |
|
Can't use hoods with a step up ring.
|
# ¿ Jun 5, 2013 10:27 |
|
Given what a good TC costs you're better off getting a decent zoom on top of your 85.
|
# ¿ Jun 12, 2013 21:01 |
|
geeves posted:edit: Reading these two posts, it sounds like the "listener" for the 6D transfer is causing a DDoS of sorts. But I can't confirm without testing it myself.
|
# ¿ Jun 19, 2013 15:39 |
|
xzzy posted:This is true for every company regardless of nationality. Bad code isn't dependent on skin color.
|
# ¿ Jun 19, 2013 22:15 |
|
It's a great beginner kit if you're comfortable with the handle shape of canons.
|
# ¿ Jun 25, 2013 09:25 |
|
Gambl0r posted:Edit: stupid question, the crop factor is 1.6, but is there anything additional when using the EF adapter? Would the 40mm pancake be 64mm or something even 'longer'?
|
# ¿ Jul 5, 2013 13:04 |
|
Or an EOS-M that actually works.
|
# ¿ Jul 10, 2013 11:21 |
|
Expanded ISO is done in digital, instead of using amps on the sensor signal. It means you'll get a better result shooting at the max native ISO setting, then pushing in post.
|
# ¿ Jul 15, 2013 20:57 |
|
Probably the Sigma unless you shoot film and can't afford the Sigma 35/1.4
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2013 00:00 |
|
somnambulist posted:Even the highest native ISO setting pushed in post is going to look like absolute poo poo though...so.........
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2013 10:51 |
|
Dren posted:Magic lantern has made progress on adding 3 stops of dynamic range to the 5d3 and 7d. http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=7139.0 "at the cost of vertical image resolution and aliasing, especially in highlights and shadows" They're scanning alternating lines at different ISOs, basically.
|
# ¿ Jul 17, 2013 15:10 |
|
Depends on bit depth and compression efficiency. Compressed raws at 14bit on my D800 are about 40MB (for 36MP).
|
# ¿ Jul 22, 2013 13:32 |
|
Shmoogy posted:Yeah this is something that can only be accomplished via chip. Software will never be able to do that- but live view focus peaking can handle it.
|
# ¿ Jul 23, 2013 21:21 |
|
Quantum of Phallus posted:Uh, what. How is the camera supposed to know what's in focus if you're using a manual lens? Shmoogy posted:But there are no electronics, how would it know? Are you telling me that the camera can know if its in focus without electronics, but is limited through software alone? I don't see how that's possible, but I'm definitely interested in knowing how if it is because that's awesome, and truly weird that they'd place such an arbitrary limitation in the camera.
|
# ¿ Jul 23, 2013 21:55 |
|
Combat Pretzel posted:When lenses are set to manual, the camera just keeps checking the AF fields and does nothing. That's your job at that point. Why it doesn't work when there's a completely manual lens, is anyone's guess. I'd hope this could be overridden in software.
|
# ¿ Jul 23, 2013 22:10 |
|
Remo posted:The 7D AF has a noticeably wider spread of cross AF points than the D7000/D7100 and the center AF point is a high precision double cross AF point, which promises more accurate AF for lenses faster tha f2.8. I would say it is still very competitive against the D7100 AF.
|
# ¿ Jul 25, 2013 11:58 |
|
Remo posted:Ok maybe I should rephrase the argument as 70D AF vs D7100 AF. At the very least its no longer as bad as the huge gap in AF between the 60D and the D7000.
|
# ¿ Jul 25, 2013 15:38 |
|
The most exciting part of the 70D is what'll happen when they put the sensor in an m body.
|
# ¿ Aug 17, 2013 12:16 |
|
Wario In Real Life posted:DxO results are like 3DMark scores. Completely distilled mathematical scores which strip away all context and real world conditions.
|
# ¿ Aug 29, 2013 23:20 |
|
No lies if Nikon made a 35/2 VR I'd snap it up at the speed of light.
|
# ¿ Sep 4, 2013 12:22 |
|
erephus posted:Will this be a reason for me to not be planning an upgrade to 6D from my 60D?
|
# ¿ Sep 10, 2013 21:00 |
|
I was about to say, it's not like Pentax is making money hand over fist, and Canon's not about to make better glass than loving fuji.
|
# ¿ Sep 16, 2013 15:40 |
|
Just wait for the next M body. They've finally figured out how to do sensor autofocus, so the next gen will have usable AF, and should be quite nice if they don't gently caress up anything else.
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2013 13:34 |
|
Do you have a camera now?
|
# ¿ Sep 20, 2013 08:11 |
|
He's saying "no idea" but if he's selling it he's already gotten a quote and it was not worth it.
|
# ¿ Oct 16, 2013 21:13 |
|
That looks like serious centering error (especially off-center). Try to shoot a newspaper inside, it'll be pretty obvious.
|
# ¿ Oct 21, 2013 23:17 |
|
yes and yes.
|
# ¿ Oct 23, 2013 16:25 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 04:26 |
|
Unlikely but genius combo IMO.
|
# ¿ Oct 26, 2013 00:50 |