Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Amarkov
Jun 21, 2010

Play posted:

Your mileage may vary, but its a strong contender for best state in the union for these reasons and more.

Just make sure to either commit no felonies or murder someone. You really really do not want to go to a low-security prison in California.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Amarkov
Jun 21, 2010

redscare posted:

Yes, San Francisco, where only the wealthy live. Us working and middle class San Franciscans who make up the majority of the city, and the 12% living in poverty, and the thousands of homeless people are actually rich people in disguise.

This, but unironically. The median household income in San Francisco is seventy three thousand dollars.

Amarkov
Jun 21, 2010

Pellisworth posted:

there's a growing tech industry here too.

Well that's wonderful news, for white and Asian men.

Amarkov
Jun 21, 2010

Sword of Chomsky posted:

You back the gently caress up off of my Tacos. First, That isn't ground beef, it's carne asada. Second, dual layered corn tortillas are the ONLY way to eat tacos. If you use flour tortillas you are commuting a crime. It's even worse of a crime if you use a hard shell of any kind. The only thing wrong with that picture is that you don't have enough chips, or salsa to dip them in.

Why would you want chips when you could have more tacos?

Especially if you find one of those places that sells tacos for less than a buck a pop. :swoon:

Amarkov
Jun 21, 2010

Miss-Bomarc posted:

The idea of taxing benefits perpetually recurs, and from both sides of the political aisle ("If we tax benefits then people will understand the true cost of healthcare!" / "If we tax benefits then people will pay money on their actual salary instead of getting to use it as a tax shelter!") So I'm not super-concerned about pay being lumped together into a single number. Particularly when retirement compensation *does* take benefits pay into account.

I wouldn't be concerned about it, if it didn't produce a misleadingly high number. When you tell people "She's getting paid X!", they will almost always assume that you mean she gets to take home X minus taxes.

  • Locked thread