|
There are lots of sex worker jobs that don't necessitate penetrative sex, but it's obvious that many will provide it and in fact, that's the whole point and it's why someone would engage their services. For example, I was just looking at a website for a professional submissive and her list of approved activities was non-penetrative (flogging, bondage, so on), but then there was a disclaimer at the bottom saying that if sex did happen it was a consensual activity and was not a paid service etc etc. Obviously this was to get around the fact that straight-up prostitution is illegal in her jurisdiction, but her services definitely involve penetrative sex like 99% of the time, right? How does this work? People who engage her services are expecting sex even though the transaction cannot be explicit. Does this create a problem for sex workers who do NOT want to engage in penetrative sex, but work in a field where the majority of their "coworkers" do provide that? How and when do you clear this up for a potential client, and is there specific language involved to shield yourself from legal prosecution? I recently read "Paying For It" by Chester Brown. Have you read it, and if so, do you think it is an accurate portrayal? (Edited because I veered into politics a bit... sorry!) Vulvarine fucked around with this message at 14:37 on Aug 28, 2013 |
#
¿
Aug 28, 2013 13:45
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 19, 2024 17:21 |
|
|
Svarotslav posted:Not sure if you have heard about this woman: I'm not a doctor, but that seems like pretty standard misogyny to me, fed by the notion that virgins are all nice and clean before they get defiled with filthy cocks and it's all downhill from there OMG. Nobody is concerned about penises getting "that much use". I'm not a sex worker, but I have found that I'm much more "in shape" when I'm having lots of sex, compared to when I'm in a dry spell. Like exercise, use it or lose it.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 30, 2013 15:15
|
|