|
edit: nevermind
SeaborneClink fucked around with this message at 12:02 on Feb 20, 2014 |
#
¿
Feb 20, 2014 11:58
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 24, 2024 20:52 |
|
|
xaarman posted:So... we can do identical procedures... we just can't call it MARSA... that seems dumb. Well you're not military, so I think it makes perfect sense. 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 19, 2014 01:47
|
|
|
Just post what you'd like to share but can't and I'm sure someone will FOIA all that stuff for you.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2014 23:32
|
|
|
Iucounu posted:Anyone else annoyed by the new "climb via SID" phraseology? Doesn't it remove a lot of verbiage if you can just issue a climb via SID, with the implied altitude/speed restrictions, instead of having to call them out explicitly </not cpc> SeaborneClink fucked around with this message at 10:56 on Apr 14, 2014 |
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2014 07:53
|
|
|
I think, and I'm willing to be corrected, is that it removes a lot of talk between ATC and pilots if ATC needs to vector the aircraft off the published DP (departure procedure) and then get them back onto the published DP but give them direct to another fix (VOR/intersection/waypoint) but still maintaining that fix's altitude and/or speed restriction. Say for example, you have a step climb off of a runway, cross Alpha at/above 5000, Bravo 7000, Charlie 10,000, Delta 15,000 but the departing aircraft is vectored for spacing off the DP between Alpha and Bravo, ATC issues "Direct Delta, climb via <DP>" So if vectored off the depicted DP, a "climb via" clearance cancels or deletes any previous lateral or vertical restrictions (speed restrictions must still be adhered to) and clears the aircraft to resume navigation to rejoin the DP at the aforementioned fix. That was at least my understanding NBAA page talking about the changes, here is a powerpoint if you want a visual reference, or a video if you have nothing better to do. 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2014 11:17
|
|
|
KodiakRS posted:Warning: The following link contains a dangerous amount of stupid: Too bad JetBlue can't sue the stupidity or sensationalism out of CNN. Their 'expert' using the word "dissention" instead of descent  Their transcription was god awful and just how exactly do they think anyone on a flight is going to hear a real TCAS alarm, which that obviously wasn't. On right, the "think" part is the problem here, they don't. 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 4, 2015 01:46
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:It's because the Colgon pilot was fat and therefore had sleep apnea and that's why he stalled a perfectly good Q400 into the ground.
|
|
#
¿
May 21, 2015 21:59
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:I meant Pinnacle 3701, got my delta connection crashes crossed.
|
|
#
¿
May 21, 2015 22:14
|
|
|
luminalflux posted:Why is this a big deal? Well having to rewrite terminal procedures, create brand new SIDs, STARS, new LOAs, SOPs and oceanic sectors and procedures to go with them is a pretty big deal. Not to mention handling the increased traffic both arrivals and departures, okay so Cuba's flag carrier isn't large but there's still a training burden there and there will be connecting flights from other Latin America carriers seeking to serve the US via Cuba and the reverse.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 24, 2015 15:27
|
|
|
MrYenko posted:All of this, plus the fact that Havana center has unreliable communications with us, and zero automation, meaning that all flight plan information must be passed manually, which is a huge time-sink. I'm not completely clear on that chunk of airspace, since I don't work it, but the people who do aren't exactly relishing the idea, particularly because the west side of it is already the 1st or 2nd busiest area in the building (we swap back and forth with them,) and the eastern side is the 3rd. It's not like the additional traffic will be going through empty airspace, is what I'm getting at. Oh for sure, I was just trying to post from a US perspective without trying to throw Havana center under the bus since I'm neither ATC or ATP. RIP Florida sectors. Bet you're glad you don't have to redraw your airspace.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 25, 2015 03:21
|
|
|
More like OZ214 was fknlo
|
|
#
¿
Jan 12, 2016 07:56
|
|
|
The Ferret King posted:I recently found out that noise-sensitive airports have sensors that trigger if an aircraft goes through the area while being too noisy. Pilots get warned and then barred from accessing that airport if they violate the noise abatement rules too often. Oh boy. KSNA is the worst airport about this. Well it's not the airport's fault, it's the idiot residents that bought literal mansions around it. I flew out of here once, fully knowing what their DP was and it still surprised me when they pulled the throttle back and pitched the nose down after the climb. The require a minimum of 13° nose up attitude, and suggest between 18-20° Have some videos! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jutmtbTrpVo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=020aYPx_9bM quote:Notice of Violation
|
|
#
¿
Aug 5, 2016 22:16
|
|
|
PT6A posted:Regarding inappropriateness: I heard someone say "oh poo poo!" on 126.7 today while giving a position report, and it made me giggle because I know I've at least thought it if I've not said it. CTAF - Common Traffic Advisory Frequency It varies from place to place but should be denoted on the sectionals. Obligatory somewhat related, "YERRRRR AHN GUEEERRRRRD"
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2017 03:38
|
|
|
PT6A posted:I always thought that was the US equivalent of 123.2 -- the frequency we monitor while operating at uncontrolled aerodromes if no other is specified. Am I mistaken, or would the CTAF be used for both enroute traffic advisories and uncontrolled aerodrome operations? Specifically, to answer the letter of your question: 122.75 and 122.85? is Air to Air, however I don't think you'll find many monitoring that. You're bound to find more people on the CTAF talking about their lunch plans.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2017 03:50
|
|
|
As long as both ions don't belong to two planes.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 5, 2017 15:28
|
|
|
Because they have to descend them faster after the point?
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2018 20:44
|
|
|
KodiakRS posted:*Giordanos. Ginos is also acceptable. Giordano's is good but if you really cared, you'd order Lou Malnati's.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 24, 2019 08:25
|
|
|
FrozenVent posted:Am I reading it correctly that the approach into Las Vegas is “casino city here I come losing gramp’s money”? There's the SINNN.SITEE3 and KSINO.SITEE3 transitions on the SITEE3 STAR, but so far as I can tell there's no 'money' fix on either.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 4, 2019 02:44
|
|
|
But have you considered that $100,000/wk is going to some FAA higher-up's golf buddy's cleaning company?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 4, 2020 07:18
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 24, 2024 20:52 |
|
|
Promote to TMU ahead of peers
|
|
#
¿
Feb 6, 2023 06:08
|
|