Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

OwlBot 2000 posted:

I made a joke or two in GBS but decided I wanted to actually learn what is being done or should be done because India is really that bad.

Nothing really can be done in such an ingrained issue filled region. I mean even colonizing or whatever would need to involve bringing back the "well in my culture we hang people who do [insane backwards thing like widow burning or gang rape as punishment] so let's see what culture wins" type of argument and that's not really effective or pleasant.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth
Yes that would be the reference. Satisfying, and a pretty sweet burn, but not really effective for long lasting changes.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

ronya posted:

Duly note that if you can empower women, you would be doing a lot that is necessary to enact cultural transformation, like crippling traditional family law, granting property titles, and so forth.

Much of rural India still has norms like "women are not allowed outside the house and farm once married". 'Empowering' here is tricky, because unilaterally leaving would result in being cut off from children and family, and regarded as tainted, immoral, et cetera.

Seriously all this 'well what if we remove power from the landlord class' won't actually DO anything. The problem is India is pretty much universally gripped by several social systems that are just objectively backwards and regressive. Those are what need to be fixed and some magic not-dictator can't actually make those changes.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Thundercracker posted:

I have an amazing idea: Let the Indians handle their affairs. Like has attempting to shoulder the "White Men's Burden" ever worked out to the benefit of the indigenious population?

The topic of direct intervention lasted for like one post, most everyone here is talking about the problems they face as a broad concept. It's not white man's burden to say a country is hosed up and should do things like educate its women.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Plastic_Gargoyle posted:

And regardless of how lovely the caste system is, ultimately you're arguing from a stance of cultural superiority here, aren't you?

There are some cultures that are objectively wrong. A culture where a woman has decent odds of being raped as punishment if she reports a rape is most likely one of those.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

computer parts posted:

Actually, to be honest the "Culture X is better than Culture Y" is problematic. There are certainly aspects of cultures which may be objectively worse but it's kind of dismissive to say that the entire culture of a region is fundamentally inferior.

You see a similar issue elsewhere - for example, the classic "Islam is misogynistic" rant by Islamophobes. Islam as a religion is not misogynistic, much as India as a culture is not misogynistic, there are just those who fall under the given groups that are misogynistic, and that can be dealt with more directly.

Islam is not misogynistic but, say, the current culture in Saudi Arabia is, and as a culture that oppresses people systematically it's inferior to one that provides equal rights and protection. I don't see the problem in making the statement specific. I agree 'Islam is misogynistic' is a wrong thing to say but in the other case I'm talking about a specific place that I don't think anyone can argue isn't misogynistic?

Like, if we all agree misogyny is bad, and a culture where a woman is in more danger seeking help for her rape than not is bad, why can't we say 'so it'd be better if that wasn't how things were there'?

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

computer parts posted:

Anti-vaccination is popular in some parts of this country, would you say American culture endorses it?

The government, for the most part, do not give them power. Remind me who in India leadership is saying hey maybe we should clean this major water source that looks more like a sewage overflow?

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth
I don't even know how this is arguable. America is hosed up but if I ever said "yo my cousin said she got raped, we should rape her as a village as punishment" I'd like, if not go to jail at least be told I'm an idiot and ignored. A place where I'd be agreed with has something objectively worse about it. I'm not sayin every Indian is a rapist, or even rape is an inherent part of the culture, I'm sayin what is going on now is the wrong thing.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Yep and I feel safe saying they are all objectively wrong and backwards in that regard.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

ronya posted:

... so there are material factors behind the cultural treatment of women? If you want to see gang rape as punishment in the West, you don't have to go very far. Try the projects. They're not inherent to the culture, they will re-emerge promptly whenever the material conditions reappear. It's not something you can 'fix' by spamming them with Westernized media and values.

And we have a standard in civilized societies where if you gang rape a lady you're mad at, you're probably going to jail. The places where village leaders are allowed to sanction it as just punishment for a woman are the ones who need to join the modern world.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth
I'm not denying gang rape exists here, I'm saying the mayor of poo poo Creek Idaho isn't allowed to sentence a woman to it because she had an affair.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth
Serious answer, education and long term reform being placed as a priority to urbanize more of the nation and allow for a more strong central government with less autonomy for village elders.

More snarky but not totally joking answer, bet if you started hanging elders who pulled poo poo like that you'd see a drop.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

ronya posted:

Seriously. Try it in another federated, decentralized, populist society close to home. America, say. How do you think that advocating that the great cities of the Eastern and Western seaboards should dictate public morality and family law in conservativesville would be received? Cursorily we could say that popular election of sheriffs and prosecutors and judges was always dumb, and that all of these posts should be filled by central appointment, but do you think this would be easy to implement in America?

If not, why on earth would you think it would be easier in India?

Yea I bet a lot of shitbags get mad whenever we pass a law like "don't beat your wife". We tell them to eat poo poo and if they break that law we put them in jail. I bet Bumfuck Nebraska hates a lot of laws that DC passes. Sucks for them.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

The Walking Dad posted:

If you want to help India, send monetary donations to the Marxist parties.

Other than that leave India the hell alone and fix the problems in your own country. People in this thread are literally advocating neo-colonialism. Just because you believe in social justice and it burns in your breast with a righteous fury that doesn't give you some imperative to enter other countries forcibly or peacefully and "correct" their way of life.

It's not cool when the Mormons do it, it's not cool when the Catholics do it, It's not cool when the secularists do it.

Which Marxists, the parties who want to enslave the lower class even more to the Arab states, or the parties that want to make it straight up illegal to hire non-union workers ever, which currently means making the majority of Indian laborers invalid?

edit: Oh and it just happens these insane concepts won't have any effect on the ethnic groups that makeup these 'parties of the people'.

sexpig by night fucked around with this message at 12:14 on Mar 13, 2014

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

PrBacterio posted:

Wouldn't that be illegal? I imagine like most countries India has laws against foreigners giving money to political parties.

Communist imperialism is ok, duh. It's like you haven't even read this pdf of Mao's red book that I skimmed over once.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth
If you legitimately believe it's either isolationism or imperialism as if it's some kinda off/on switch I don't know how you can think anyone will take your view of groups like the UN seriously. Like, you've already established that literally anything but isolationism (which, in itself if a huge spectrum) is imperialism to you.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Boogaleeboo posted:

No I'm pretty much entirely loving around because Owlbot was a joke in the India thread in GBS, but the UN has actually gotten up to some terrible things that just get brushed under the rug. And I'm surprised every time people forget that.

We didn't forget it but that doesn't make you not a crazy dude for acting like they're standard operations or whatever and the UN is part of the "IMPERIALISM ON" side of the switch.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

New Division posted:

It's one thing to provide education for members of your own culture, and a fairly different thing to try and 'educate' another culture. That's before you consider the fact that providing 'education' for subordinated cultures has been a historical feature of every empire ever, and was often involved cruelty and repression towards the subordinate culture.

Why are there dismissive quotes around education when the issue is mainly 'don't rape girls and set them on fire or cut their clits off'? Can we not say there are objectively wrong views to hold and they should be educated away?

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

illrepute posted:

I don't really get why people are going after a dude for putting quotation marks around "Education" when their own posts are bookended by ones suggesting that a little war to destroy some thirty percent of the Indian population might be a good solution to go for.

Yea that other guy's a fuckin moron but there's no real discussion to be had with that kind of dude. I can ask a question about quotes and probably get a non-insane answer, but yea if I ask the dude why he thinks a little war is good for the poors I don't really think I'm going to get an answer that isn't stupid/crazy.

edit: see? I got an answer that reads like a human being who doesn't live in the 19th century responded.

New Division posted:

The changes and education is going to have to be pushed from within Indian society. I think there are reasons to be optimistic that this will happen, though it may not be as rapid as some hope.

I don't think Westerners have too much to to contribute except funding for Indian NGOs and government efforts that are trying to deal with these issues.

I think there are very few people saying the only option here is to colonize them again, but the fact is the Indian government and general culture is super resistant to these efforts. I mean, people keep saying we should just support the right parties and all but the socialist party that controls one of the biggest chunks of populated land just said 'eh death penalty for rapists is no good, a lot of women are lairs you know'. There are very few efforts within the place to change things.

sexpig by night fucked around with this message at 01:06 on Apr 15, 2014

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

shrike82 posted:

Considering that the OP is arguing that the impetus for change will come externally, I don't see why it's weird to interpret the thread as Colonialism 2.0

Do you believe outside NGOs are colonial powers?

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

shrike82 posted:

If you can't differentiate between an NGO holding educational classes on contraceptives and a foreign government imposing sanctions...

Look at the can of worms that Jim Kim and the World Bank just opened by killing a bunch of loans to Uganda due to them not hewing the line on gay rights...

It's a yes or no question, an NGO is an 'outside force' educating people about things that are pretty objectively wrong, you said the post talking about any outside force doing that was easy to jump to imperialism.

By 'not hewing the line' you mean literally criminalizing it and publishing a list of gays to incite violence?

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

New Division posted:

I think there's some reasons to be hopeful. For one the younger generation of Indian women looks like it has a lot of members who will be willing to challenge old cultural norms and practices, and the very fact that these issues are being widely discussed and acknowledged as an issue within the Indian public sphere is a good thing.

Waiting for the old guys to die off never works though.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

New Division posted:

Not all NGOs could be considered outside forces. There are some Indian NGOs.

And they most likely need outisde aid. Is that imperialism? I mean if I give money to an Indian NGO because I believe that the excuse of 'well it's the culture' doesn't justify raping a nine year old isn't that me forcing my values?

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

shrike82 posted:

Wife burnings and caste are egregious but where do you draw the line on what deserves foreign intervention?

Women get paid $0.77 for every $1 that men get. Racism is still entrenched in vast swathes of the country with widespread attempts at disenfranchisement.
Should we send foreign peacekeepers into the States and impose sanctions on US exports till this changes?

That's a pretty huge drop in scale isn't it?

But yea if some Dutch dude said that poo poo was backwards I'd go 'yea fair point'.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

shrike82 posted:

How about prison culture in the US?
That poo poo is enough for UN peacekeepers I'd say.

A UN program educating people that prison should be for rehab rather than punishment sure.

Like don't worry man, these things won't change much for a while, we're talking a few posters saying 'yo maybe don't rape a nine year old' and 'leave that clit attached dude!' and outreach to the victims as the main function of these groups.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Thundercracker posted:

I see your point. But "What should India do to speed up its development?" is maybe 10% of the solutions posted in this at best. Like, seriously the dominate theme of solutions is aligned with "How do we educate/fix/deal with these ignorant Indians".

Like, the thread title actually matches the contents.

Why do you think education is on the same level as 'deal with these ignorant Indians'?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth
Yea if I was poor as poo poo (you said they were doing this in slums and poo poo, as in the places where people have near literally nothing?) I'd pretty much vote for whatever stupid crazy party was giving me fat stacks and booze, hard to be mad at anyone but the assholes who used those dudes as pawns there.

  • Locked thread