Linux: vim isn't moe

Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Serious Hardware/Software Crap > YOSPOS > Linux: vim isn't moe

Quebec Bagnet: Apr 28, 2009; mess with the honk
you get the bonk; Lipstick Apathy

Beamed posted:

aren't bsds dead

netcraft confirms it

# ¿ Jan 7, 2017 16:56

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 04:36

Quebec Bagnet: Apr 28, 2009; mess with the honk
you get the bonk; Lipstick Apathy

hifi posted:

i'll always laugh at korn shell

what would a KoЯn shell be like

# ¿ Nov 7, 2018 19:26

Quebec Bagnet: Apr 28, 2009; mess with the honk
you get the bonk; Lipstick Apathy

Poopernickel posted:

that would be one hell of a load-bearing feature-flag

can you imagine feature-flagging every single stdlib function that takes a string, in order to make it take a bytes instead? and feature-flagging the parser, etc? also feature-flagging class definition syntax, and god knows what else? And marking flag-compatibility in literally every module in the stdlib?

package management continues to be an insane garbage fire though.

we already have that anyway, it's called perl

# ¿ Oct 3, 2023 23:18

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Serious Hardware/Software Crap > YOSPOS > Linux: vim isn't moe