|
what's wrong with xfce?
|
#
¿
Jun 28, 2016 11:02
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 16:19 |
|
|
Nvidia optimus, wtf. Make it work easy without me having to dick around with lots of poo poo wait this was upposed to be in reply to the poster whos aid that linux worked out of the box
|
|
#
¿
Jul 20, 2016 10:39
|
|
|
The_Franz posted:https://twitter.com/BruceDawson0xB/status/723042731421921280 We have a piece of equipment that can only run on the super-advanced ME version of Windows. IT loves it. I got optimus working somehow the other night. I was drunk so I don't remember but it's nice to be able to use coot again
|
|
#
¿
Jul 22, 2016 10:10
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:i am going to try to upgrade to fedora 24 today. but first i need to make sure my last 6 months of dotfiles are saved. wish me luck why? wait until 23 is dead before you attempt that
|
|
#
¿
Jul 30, 2016 07:41
|
|
|
and how did it? Children not using apple is a good/bad thing?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 12, 2016 09:51
|
|
|
what SELinux is preventing google-chrome-s from create access on the file 63. ***** Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests ************************** If you believe that google-chrome-s should be allowed create access on the 63 file by default. Then you should report this as a bug. You can generate a local policy module to allow this access. Do allow this access for now by executing: # ausearch -c 'google-chrome-s' --raw | audit2allow -M my-googlechromes # semodule -X 300 -i my-googlechromes.pp This pops up every time I start chrome but it doesn't seem to do anything. Same with printing. What SELinux doing?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 03:34
|
|
|
what computer is that? Is all of lenovo doing that now? nm googled it bssoil fucked around with this message at 12:34 on Sep 21, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Sep 21, 2016 12:08
|
|
|
aw crap do I have to upgrade from fedora 23 finally?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 2, 2017 12:02
|
|
|
Ah poo poo looks like upgrade time - no more Fedora 24 support. What will break this time (besides wifi)? Sometimes I use kate and it's pretty good
|
|
#
¿
Aug 15, 2017 10:48
|
|
|
Generic Monk posted:what is dnf meant to stand for because whenever i see it i can only think of 'duke nukem forever' or 'did not finish', the latter of which may be appropriate in the context of linux on the desktop dinf which fedora should I put on my fancy xps (ie, which version is most likely to work out o the box)?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 12, 2017 11:15
|
|
|
Sapozhnik posted:https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/modularity-dead-long-live-modularity/ " the Fedora Council"
|
|
#
¿
Dec 21, 2017 12:21
|
|
|
So, uh, anyone know what happens if you have set up a vm that is your real hard drive, and you are running Fedora and want to run an installed windows on another partition, but don't get to grub in your vm in time and accidentally start up Fedora, which you are currently running?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2018 11:33
|
|
|
Poopernickel posted:what happens though, for real? Death. Worst panic. I quickly killed vmware to no effect. Fedora broken, Windows broken. Sadness all around. Never cross the streams 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 24, 2018 10:56
|
|
|
Tankakern posted:i think this is what bumblebee and all those projects did, and it has worked for quite a while. but that copy-framebuffer-to-the-intel-Xserver was a major bottleneck, and has been since the inception. now, with proper PRIME support you finally have a fast path, so you'll get the same experience as in windows I'm hesitant to make any changes to my 6-year-old laptop. Bumblebee seems to be doing the trick, but maybe I don't GPU hard enough?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 14, 2019 11:56
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 16:19 |
|
|
bssoil posted:I'm hesitant to make any changes to my 6-year-old laptop. Bumblebee seems to be doing the trick, but maybe I don't GPU hard enough? Oh ballz, bumblebee doesn't actually work anymore. gently caress
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2019 11:22
|
|