|
RealityApologist posted:I'm getting bitched at because it's not in 5 paragraph composition format. That, and because you're an insane techno-fetishist with a history of denying he's an insane techno-fetishist while advocating insane techno-fetishism.
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2025 23:43 |
|
RealityApologist posted:Traditional economics is like alchemy, and I'm like one of the early chemists before the periodic table or anything else was developed but who has a pretty good sense that alchemy is just bad methodology and that there's an alternative science just around the corner. And you all are like "but why should I believe in the atom" as if I'm heretical for suggesting alchemy needs some updating, and there's honestly nothing I can say to satisfy the lot of you. The only thing I can do is be earnest and try my best. It's never good enough, but I can't reasonably expect anything more. Allow me to repeat my sage advice from when you went off bemoaning the horrible discrimination you envisioned cyborgs (like yourself) experiencing at some point in the future, which you expected to be as bad, if not worse, than that of racial minorities and homosexuals: get the gently caress over yourself, Eripsa.
|
![]() |
|
Escolopendra posted:Wait a moment, what is the basis exactly for fearing future cyborg discrimination? There are people right now with mechanical prostheses, and they donīt seem to be objects of hate and discrimination. Eripsa's entire basis for such fears were his own feverish sense of self-importance, and hopes to somehow shame those of us laughing at our lunatic ideas by comparing himself to civil-/gay-right activists. Oh, and someone used the term "glasshole" to describe a particularly obnoxious Google glass wearer, which is clearly equivalent to a Jim Crow lynch mob.
|
![]() |
|
Who What Now posted:If anyone still has that short-story posted in one of the OP's last threads about the Attention-based Society and the big Cat Video Gundam vs Porno-Titan battle please post it. This is a perfect time to reread it and I wanna share it with some friends. Your wish is my command, in this and only this specific instance: Cefte posted:Attention Deficit Disorder For those of you who are having their first go-around with Eripsa's feverish lunacy, I highly recommend reading the thread that really started all this, or at least clued us in that he and reality have been seeing other people for some time now.
|
![]() |
|
Pesmerga posted:This is absolutely hilarious, and has my full attention I'm one too, and normally I'm a big advocate of inter-disciplinary exchange but it every time I start to think about maybe seeing what someone outside of history would think of my current work, Eripsa posts a new thread. I really hope he's an edge case of what goes on in philosophy grad studies. Who What Now posted:Awesome, thank you! You're a good person. My pleasure, but all credit ought go to Cefte for writing that. I nearly fell out of my chair laughing when I first read it.
|
![]() |
|
SedanChair posted:He once posted a link to what he claimed was the first part of his dissertation. It was a bunch of word salad without citations. If he is actually in a program his advisor should face consequences for not nipping this poo poo in the bud. I thought we
|
![]() |
|
R. Mute posted:Has the OP answered why we'd want this system yet? Do you even need to ask? MD2020 posted:I'm marbling the gently caress out of this iron ore over here, so the first step is taken care of. You have no idea how hard I'm looking at this rusty bumper someone left over by the dumpster. I'll expect my dividends shortly.
|
![]() |
|
RealityApologist posted:You linked to obdicut's post, which has such insightful criticisms as I dunno, you might actually give us something concrete to support your assertion that this actually is a big idea, rather than just continuing to assert that it is. Or were you using "big" to refer to the amount of brain swelling your suffered prior to having the idea?
|
![]() |
|
R. Mute posted:Actually, they are both gaining money! It's amazing! Does this mean when he flops his dissertation defense, his undergrads get expelled?
|
![]() |
|
Wanamingo posted:I'm 4 pages into that marble thread somebody linked a little while back, and holy wow does RA have problems. How can somebody function in society if they so clearly don't understand how people work? Fellowship extensions would be my guess.
|
![]() |
|
Who What Now posted:This brings up another point, just how exactly are people supposed to have any access to this information, much less be expected to decipher tens of thousands of pages worth of information that is constantly updating? Why, that will all be handled by The Computer. Trust The Computer, citizen! The Computer is your friend!
|
![]() |
|
Who What Now posted:Somehow I don't think he would be too unhappy of real life was more like a game of Paranoia. I also have a feeling that engaging in RA's supposed end-goal reality would, in fact, require neural implants in order to keep in constant contact with the necessary information streams. Ah, that solves it: he's a Copore Metal sympathizer.
|
![]() |
|
Slanderer posted:In the cyber future, gender will be as arbitrary as your choice of shoes. Nanosurgery drones will be able to perform gender replacement surgery while you sleep (utilizing your home bank of replacement genitalia). "I didn't ask for this...Oh wait, I totally did. Repeatedly."
|
![]() |
|
SedanChair posted:Eripsa I'm stoked that you're off to see Judith Butler. That ought to help you bring your abstruse, inchoate pop-theorizing down to earth. You eternal optimist, you.
|
![]() |
|
Zachack posted:It's been well over a decade since I read it but wasn't the basis of the economy revolving around free maker piles that provided basic necessities for all while fancier maker plans were controlled by neo-victorians? And people made nanoviruses to steal info? And the Middle class was service/IP creation because manufacturing literally didn't exist? And little else of society was shown? Pretty much, though the Vickys only had a commanding share on top-level design/production, rather than a total monopoly. The other top-tier phyles were seen as serious competition, and lower-level phyles could also be in particular areas.
|
![]() |
|
Adventure Pigeon posted:I'm beginning to think that as soon as he's vaguely offended by whatever anyone says, he puts them on ignore. There's a reason he hasn't responded to Obdicut or anyone else who's been criticizing him in more than a few posts. Hey that's a little harsh, don't you think? He's clearly got a lot on his plate what with all the thinking up new unreasonable nonsense and not reading books.
|
![]() |
|
Adar posted:If you retards hijack this thread away from Eripsa the terrorists will literally have won. Hmm, wait a minute, upside-down triangles you say? We all know what those unnatural things represent! ![]()
|
![]() |
|
RealityApologist posted:I'm really disappointed that this has become the caricature of my style. I've come back to this forum for years to talk about and refine my thinking about different aspects of this theory, and I spend a lot of time responding to criticisms and providing interpretations and elaborations on my work. I really feel like the strangecoin proposal demonstrates some improvement, both in focus, organization, and technical clarity, of anything I've written about on these forums. I feel it represents a good faith attempt to meet a lot of the legitimate criticisms that have been put forward. I feel like I get no credit for this work on this forum, especially given how ambitious it is. This is the second time you've pulled a BernieLomax defense, and I'm no more inclined to let it go unnoticed than I was back in the "world run by software" thread. Adar posted:Thomas Friedman is both much more right about everything and a better writer than you, sorry. Jesus, man. That is harsh. Let's not say things we can't take back.
|
![]() |
|
Who What Now posted:Then why, and this is super important so really think about this and answer well, why should we even care at all?! I'm going to stop being mean for a moment here, no joke: this, Eripsa, is one of the most important things about real academic work. All my committee members, both for comps and dissertation, always cautioned me that no matter what I found interesting, I had to be able to answer the "so what?" question someone might toss at me after asking what I was working on. I've found it very helpful to remind myself when writing that other people might not give a poo poo about my ideas just because I, personally, find them interesting. That I find them interesting does not necessarily mean they have value, or even interest, for literally anyone else at all. I always, always need to have at least some justification for what I'm talking about and how it fits into/contributes to the historiography of the field. You've babbled on at exceptional length about how neat you think strangecoins are, fine; so what?
|
![]() |
|
RealityApologist posted:^^ I just haven't been funded in years, and they pull your access if you're not enrolled. I was on google scholar Wait, didn't you say you were defending at some point in the near future? My funding ran out before I was finished and I still managed the one-credit continuing research course, with all the journal access that went with it. Maybe I'm assuming too much: have you even had comps yet, or finished your course work?
|
![]() |
|
RealityApologist posted:Learning is an active process that includes both writing and study and also engaging peers. I am learning. You are my peers. When was the last time you submitted a chapter draft to your committee?
|
![]() |
|
RealityApologist posted:For instance, Strangecoin users might be better able to stabilize their network, and might be able to arrange more efficient divisions of social labor than on other models, because of the feedback from the network it makes available. Good Dumplings posted:[*] A word longer than 3 syllables (besides "Strangecoin") or longer than 10 characters (again, besides "Strangecoin"). Available is 4 syllables, you lose.
|
![]() |
|
RealityApologist posted:It's worse than that, because many of the books required for such a library haven't been written, and some of the basic scientific research for writing it hasn't yet taken place. I've said this before in dismissive terms, but this time I want to repeat it in a more serious, concerned tone: get the gently caress over yourself. Seriously: you are way too high on your own supply here, dude. You've taken some interesting ideas about the roles integrated technology in modern/future society and whatnot and turned them into staggeringly utopian pipe dream, in which you're way too personally invested. It's fine to daydream and whatnot but for gently caress's sake try to keep at least one foot on the ground as you do so, else you'll never actually manage to contribute anything about the level of fetishistic blathering. This thread, and your previous ones, show that clearly enough to any even mildly sober observer.
|
![]() |
|
RealityApologist posted:I'm literally stunned every time I see someone online inferring from the phrase "tragedy of the commons" that all commons are tragic. Tell me Eripsa, how long have you and reality been seeing other people? Has it been a decade by now?
|
![]() |
|
LGD posted:I mean those techniques could have been science if they were taught to our ancestors by the ancient aliens. Just, you know, alien science. And not something that actually happened or could happen. Still, that "theory" probably has more basic plausibility and evidence behind it than Strangecoin currently does. Before I decide whether or not to take this seriously: How out of control is your hairdo right now?
|
![]() |
|
LGD posted:Extremely. I'm like a month overdue for a haircut and I just got out of the shower. Then I fully believe you were serious about the aliens from a really long time ago.
|
![]() |
|
Adar posted:They trade with them anyway because why the gently caress wouldn't you, it's just that it will be on the barter system, in the black market or at a 20% discount or all of the above. Also the black market would quickly overwhelm the regular "economy", using that term loosely, as people quickly realize that they don't really *want* to calculate the exact benefit of coupling with the guy who brings them their coffee or the guy who inspected their sewer pipe prior to every single time they make a trade for something and other people realize they can launder every transaction made by the -rep crew and become billionaires until they themselves fall into -rep 200 billion richer and recruit the next guy to take their place ad infinitum. At some point before -rep becomes standard and total societal collapse because, again, why the gently caress wouldn't it, you can rest assured I will run bartertown on my throne of starving orphan skulls. Well good to know I didn't take one sleeve of my leather jacket for nothing! Now to find a bitchin' muscle car and a sawed-off.
|
![]() |
|
Who What Now posted:How did that one go? (Besides spectacularly awful) About as you'd expect ie: spectacularly awful. But don't take my word for it, see for yourself.
|
![]() |
|
Who What Now posted:7) Insist if a programmer would just make a model of what was described in 1 it would prove it works 10) Use an example from an unrelated field, make a glaring error about said example and/or field while doing so, handwave furiously.
|
![]() |
|
Kjoery posted:Wait what, I'm not even sure what the "problem" was, but the solution (after 5 paragraphs of salad) was to apparently to present 20 people with 50 servings of food. Why indeed, Kjoery. Why indeed. quote:e: doesn't his example actually demonstrate inefficiency of self-organization? Did he just refute himself with his own argument? Probably, who can tell!
|
![]() |
|
SedanChair posted:This would have been the post that convinced me you're a Turing test entry if I hadn't seen and heard you do it in person. Wait a minute, I feel like I've said that before...years ago..weeks ago?! What is real? Who am I? What's happening to me? Oh no, it's suddenly all clear. The blathering word salad, the constant repetition of poorly-expressed points, none of it's actually there to convince us of anything! Eripsa's just trying to create a thread so densely packed with technofetishistic nonsense that it collapses into the singularity!
|
![]() |
|
RealityApologist posted:Once this list is complete it might be useful to compile a list of things that are genuinely interesting about attention economy/strangecoin and worth developing independent of my crackpot ramblings. I admit it would be a total cheap shot to say "absolutely nothing." ... ... 1) Absolutely nothing. EDIT: beat me on the draw this time, Who What Now.
|
![]() |
|
RealityApologist posted:Not at all. But I think most of you are groupthink idiots who haven't demonstrated a basic comprehension of anything going on in this thread, and whose only interest is getting out shots in where you can. It forms the constant background of hostility which fields people like obdicut can launch their more obsessive concern for my identity and existence. This is the third thread in which we've dance the same dance, and to my utter lack of surprise you've shown virtually identical behavior. Are you really surprised that some of us are getting a wee bit tired of the effort of asking valid questions and raising concerns about your feverish thought experiment, only to get back gibberish and/or dismissal in return? Especially when it comes in the form of: quote:I think the most objectively helpful parts of the thread are when others clarify confusions expressed in the thread, or link discussions to similar ones in previous threads, or work through various dystopian possibilities with the proposal, and in general When other people contribite to the development and systematization of the idea. Which presumes that, somehow, the burden is on us to help you flesh out, or shore up as the case may be, the idea in question. You proposed this strangecoin nonsense, you are the one that is responsible for making it make sense. This isn't a research seminar, dude. quote:Amateur psychoanalysis is, you might expect, not particularly productive. Well I'll certainly grant if anyone in this thread is an expert on not being particularly productive, it's you.
|
![]() |
|
Obdicut posted:The weird part where he cites Adar as someone offering 'interpretation' and how great that is when Adar has been more (hilariously) merciless in his mocking than anyone else. Yeah, that is truly bizarre. Eripsa, I've said it before and no doubt you'll ignore it again this time but seriously: you are too drat personally invested in this idea. Please, please, please; step back, take a breath or two, and at least try to consider this entire thing on its own merits alone, separate from how much of a digital pioneer or whatever you feel for having thought it up.
|
![]() |
|
RealityApologist posted:I'm not bothered by it, or I wouldn't be here. But it makes the conversation much more difficult than it would be otherwise, and the standards demanded of my posting are that much higher. Ah yes, "knowing anything at all about what you're talking about = being a genius demigod." You sure got us there, what absurdly high standards we've required of you.
|
![]() |
|
Slanderer posted:The endless circularity of his reasoning makes perpetual motion seem so close.... Careful, send the derail in that direction and we all may get a steorn warning...
|
![]() |
|
Yiggy posted:See you guys again in a few months! Don't be so quick; once Eripsa gets back from his traveling or whatever I've no doubt he'll have some "new" thoughts that will totally blow our minds, man.
|
![]() |
|
Adar posted:In Strangecoinland, the prices may as well be a quantum wave function because there are too many variables for anyone to give a gently caress about so they feed you and in exchange you fix their pipes next month. But assuming barter doesn't work because handwaving, one day, you do well at your job and get a big bonus. (We will assume this bonus isn't a total waste and doesn't put you over the account cap). You go over to the restaurant and order a meal which, today, is more or less or indeterminately expensive than it was the last time you ordered it (it is a mere 15 step process to figure this out). You pay them this new amount and find that there is a discount applied for being good at your job. The restaurant also found this out for the first time and is very displeased, so takes the economically beneficent step of throwing you out and only serving people who suck at their jobs, who pay more for the same meal. I sorta pictured it being more like that scene in Road Warrior where Max eats dog food straight from the can.
|
![]() |
|
Little Blackfly posted:What RA obviously wants out of all this is community enforced ethical consumption. Any attempt to purchase products or services from nodes caries an explicit economic cost, so presumably it would disincentivize dealing with those nodes. Basically every transaction people would do between each other would become a complex calculation as to how much of your economic karma you'd want to risk. It's a lot like a libertarian's fetishizaiton of contracts. As well as their presumption that loss of reputation/scammer tags are effective ways to disincentivize scummy-but-profitable behavior.
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2025 23:43 |
|
Republican Vampire posted:Eripsa is basically peak Californian, and the Californian ideology is an outgrowth of libertarianism. I dunno about that. While there is considerable overlap between utopian technofetishists and libertarians, they're not entirely synonymous even among Californian tech/startup whackadoos. If I remember right from one of the earlier iterations of this thread, Eripsa doesn't consider himself to be libertarian, though I may be misremembering that.
|
![]() |