|
Apparently horror films expect me to believe that all it takes to frame someone for murder in modern times is to get their fingerprints on the murder weapon and add a dash some other circumstancial evidence, and voila! Instant jailtime! Nevermind that simply looking at the sequence of events, the bodies, and the crime scene would make it extremely obvious that at least one other person was responsible. Heck, most of the time simple forensics or goddamn common sense would prove that they were innocent. Sure, they might still get committed to a mental hospital for saying that a monster did it, but they won't be blamed for the crime. Oh, and the mayor who shoots down the protagonist's protests is clearly an Evil Capitalist Pig for daring to be concerned about the town's economy. Now, if the protagonist had proof, that's one thing, but if all they have is a few strange incidents then of course the mayor isn't going to do something drastic until they're sure. Especially since, as mayor, they will be held the most responsible, not the protagonist. Even if they're a corrupt rear end in a top hat who only cares about money doesn't mean that they don't have a point about not crippling an entire town on heresay.
|
#
¿
May 12, 2014 18:11
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 20:37 |
|