A Delirious Dilemma in the Depths of Dementia - A Game of Mafia

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Traditional Games > The Game Room > A Delirious Dilemma in the Depths of Dementia - A Game of Mafia

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

Hay guys, I went through the thread and read the very last post, so I have a pretty grasp of what's going on

Captain Foo posted:

##vote meinberg trying to go for a joketurbo and then backing out with an elaborate cover of "i wasn't paying attention"

sure

this seems as reasonable as anything d1 i guess

##vote Meinberg

# ¿ May 31, 2014 14:47

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ Apr 24, 2024 12:29

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

It's true, he doesn't usually seem to care, although I don't recall seeing him at -1 before so maybe his survival instinct kicked in

# ¿ May 31, 2014 16:38

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

JakeP posted:

If you are going to automatically assume anyone who lied to you in a previous game is always lying, you are going to be policy voting everyone if you play enough games. Does it not make sense that I might not mind getting myself lynched as a vanilla town, but I might put a bit more effort to protect myself if I am a town power role? Sure I would also do the same thing as scum or 3P, but to assume I am not town because I don't want to be lynched is outright dumb.

I'm so conflicted right now, you don't usually put this kinda effort in.

# ¿ Jun 1, 2014 14:42

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

I'd rather no-vote then vote town.

# ¿ Jun 2, 2014 14:57

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

JakeP posted:

If only we knew other players alignments

~~guts~~

# ¿ Jun 2, 2014 14:59

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

##vote JakeP

I really don't think you're town.

# ¿ Jun 2, 2014 21:08

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

It's broken for all games, I'm pretty sure. Not sure who takes care of it now.

# ¿ Jun 2, 2014 21:58

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

Ixtlilton posted:

Pretty sure it's TwelveBaud who's in charge now. Also, why is Jake scum?

He's playing very guarded. Usually he'll shitpost up a storm.

He'll respond to things, but he's careful. I've played with him a few times recently, and this isn't normal play for him.

# ¿ Jun 2, 2014 23:20

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

Ixtlilton posted:

And you don't think his softclaim is a more likely reason for slightly different play than him being scum?

I don't, if he were town PR and really cared about not dying, he'd make more of an effort to find another target or something.

But right now his only effort is to mostly lay low, and make sure he doesn't get merked.

# ¿ Jun 2, 2014 23:57

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

~~~~~~~~~~~
##unvote
~~~~~~~~~~~

##vote JakeP

# ¿ Jun 3, 2014 00:35

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

I think that is hammer.

# ¿ Jun 3, 2014 01:28

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

Ugh sorry, Jake

# ¿ Jun 3, 2014 02:31

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

Asiina posted:

Well poop.

I feel like a lot of this was my fault.

I think it was all your fault :mad:

# ¿ Jun 3, 2014 02:40

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

Tremendous Taste posted:

nah it's cool we got info

JakeP - confirmed town doctor

# ¿ Jun 3, 2014 03:10

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

Meinberg posted:

Nah, I'm sure there is scum. I just feel bad about being a part of the group that lynched our doctor. That said, avoiding a no-hang is likely for the best, and no real targets emerged other than Jake, and I'll acknowledge that the case on him was flimsy at best. Flimsy, though, is better than nothing.

Ya this is pretty bad

# ¿ Jun 3, 2014 04:39

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

Meinberg was saying there is no scum.. hard to see who could benefit more than him by withholding the kill. :colbert:

# ¿ Jun 3, 2014 06:08

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

Good idea..

##vote no merk

# ¿ Jun 3, 2014 06:16

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

I don't think a no-merk is such a bad thing.. we don't have to do it forever. But why not survive while we can. I'm sure there are people doing night ~actions~ so there will probably be useful information.

I really don't mind voting Meinberg, but since nobody has died, he doesn't seem like a big threat.

# ¿ Jun 3, 2014 14:59

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

Scum isn't a threat as long as they aren't killing anybody.

# ¿ Jun 3, 2014 16:03

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

You're trying to put a spin on my words.

But hey don't worry, you voting for Meinberg early shows everybody that you are super town for sure.

# ¿ Jun 3, 2014 16:04

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

True, as long as we're sure we're not going to vote another town PR.

# ¿ Jun 3, 2014 16:16

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

Yeah, my thought is that there are night actions happening.. probably someone investigating people. So people will probably be cleared. But I'm okay voting scum.

But if Meinberg flips town cop...

# ¿ Jun 3, 2014 17:10

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

This is the OP currently.

I've been a willing pawn in Ecco's experiments too many times to trust him in a game revolving around dementia. :colbert:

So we vote Meinberg. What if he flips town? What's the plan if there is no nightkill again?

# ¿ Jun 3, 2014 17:29

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

Feeling bad about JakeP

# ¿ Jun 3, 2014 17:45

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

Whoa so angry

Fine, let's vote Meinberg.

##vote Meinberg

Hopefully he flips town, so then you guys vote me and then chain-merk town into oblivion.

# ¿ Jun 3, 2014 17:55

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

~~~~~~~~~~~~
##unvote
~~~~~~~~~~~~

##vote Meinberg

:smugdog:

# ¿ Jun 3, 2014 20:18

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

Well that is interesting.

# ¿ Jun 4, 2014 01:18

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

Grandicap posted:

Ok, so mod error. I feel less confused, but still confused, because a 9 player game with 2 jailers (of any alignment) and a doc is just silly.

So silly especially when you consider this is a game by a creative mod based on dementia. :rolleyes:

# ¿ Jun 4, 2014 02:08

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ Apr 24, 2024 12:29

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

Ixtlilton posted:

The game was clearly over and I figured you guys knew me well enough that me replacing out would basically be a scumclaim. It played out exactly as I said it would.

Thanks for the game, Ecco, my favorite part was the ~speculation~

# ¿ Jun 12, 2014 05:01

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Traditional Games > The Game Room > A Delirious Dilemma in the Depths of Dementia - A Game of Mafia