|
I'm gonna head out soon but one more thing before I do. Asiina made a post I can't recall atm that I thought was scummy, but I thought she was dead. It turns out she is not so I'm looking at her post history now. And it's OMG so scum. Bigup DJ posted:Hey I'm not going to be around from now to the deadline, I've got an exam on. I like people to have more than one choice for lynching so I'm putting my vote on Big Nothing. Asiina posted:I really don't like this vote. to this vv Asiina posted:I suppose, the wording was just very cavalier and strange to me. I do agree with his earlier posts though that BN's built-in scumminess will be a problem later in the game whether he's scum or not and better to lynch him now to be sure. I'd vote Asiina too. I'm going to try and find that post I made a mental note of where was it ugh!
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 18:07 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 07:22 |
|
Big Nothing posted:I dont steal the role Does that mean you imitate the chosen players PR? That would be useful as it'd effectively be a one-shot role cop in addition to giving you a PR, however it requires us to trust you are telling the truth, which I'm not sure we'll be willing or able to at this point.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 18:12 |
|
Asiina posted:I dunno, I don't really see a problem with Bigup's statement. BN is always going to be the scummiest guy in the game because that's his default state. Asiina defends Bigup here, later calls out a random post of his (see my post above!), and then argues to kill BN because he's unreadable. That last point I think is the real stickler-- Asiina bases all of her D1 content on why we should kill a player who ~has a default state of scummy~ She also tip-toes around Bigup and her content there looks fake. Revision, this is my best case. Read and comment on this case please, thanks-- merk that means you! ##vote Asiina
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 18:13 |
|
I don't like how the pendulum has swung so wildly in the last few hours. Why are we moving off of BN? I THINK THERE'S A PUSH FROM THE SCUM AHHHHHHHHHH
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 18:17 |
|
Puntification posted:Does that mean you imitate the chosen players PR? That would be useful as it'd effectively be a one-shot role cop in addition to giving you a PR, however it requires us to trust you are telling the truth, which I'm not sure we'll be willing or able to at this point. No, i get a role based on who i chose. I can't go into details because i honestly don't know more than that . My role is called 'God's lonely Man'. Why are people so eager to get me shot? Just paranoia?
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 18:22 |
|
Shoot everybody, let god sort 'em out.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 18:29 |
|
yuming, I think you might be onto something with Asii. Those were some scummy posts you highlighted and she hasn't contributed at all to D3. I'm not so sure of your case against PM though. If he was scum then why would he switch votes from me to capps in the middle of a protracted dispute between the two of us that I was clearly losing?
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 18:32 |
|
Big Nothing posted:Why are people so eager to get me shot? Just paranoia? Yes! My role is closely aligned to my flavour, and your claimed role and flavour aren't aligned at all - your flavour is super scummy, and you're pushing to get lynched. That makes it look like maybe bad things happen to town if you get lynched, so it's better to be safe and shoot you.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 18:32 |
|
Rarity posted:yuming, I think you might be onto something with Asii. Those were some scummy posts you highlighted and she hasn't contributed at all to D3. I'm not so sure of your case against PM though. If he was scum then why would he switch votes from me to capps in the middle of a protracted dispute between the two of us that I was clearly losing? Why wouldn't scum do this?
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 18:38 |
|
Puntification posted:Why wouldn't scum do this? Cause it's going from supporting a case against someone who's already under suspicion to supporting a case that isn't getting any support. Why would scum do that? If I'm town then they'd just stick on me, if I'm scum as well then they'd try to find a new bandwagon instead.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 18:47 |
|
Sometimes scum do things that make no sense!! But I agree Asiina is a better case. Yay lynch scums~
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 18:49 |
|
I want to give Rarity a chance for last words.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 18:53 |
|
It would be rude not to lynch BN, the guys is begging for it. Don't be so heartless
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 18:55 |
|
Or shoot him
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 18:55 |
|
##vote BN
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 18:56 |
|
Tremendous Taste posted:I want to give Rarity a chance for last words. I think Rarity is a bad kill. Kill Keane instead.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 18:57 |
|
Tremendous Taste posted:I want to give Rarity a chance for last words. I'm not playing along with this bullshit. Just go ahead and vote me, you're obviously gonna do it no matter what I say
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 18:57 |
|
Rarity posted:Cause it's going from supporting a case against someone who's already under suspicion to supporting a case that isn't getting any support. Why would scum do that? If I'm town then they'd just stick on me, if I'm scum as well then they'd try to find a new bandwagon instead. Suppose you and capps are both town, scum sees the dispute, either way they win if one of you get mislynched. Maybe they think it potentially looks bad for capps if he leads the charge against you and they'll be in a better position if they are already on record accusing him of being scummy to attack him. Not all scum are the same and follow the same logic, so it's not necessarily useful to believe scum would always do x in situation y.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 18:57 |
|
merk posted:I think Rarity is a bad kill. Kill Keane instead. Don't be dumb. This would be dumb and then you'd be like "oh I blame Keane blah blah blah" and then probably fart in your cupped hand and bring it to your nose, inhaling deeply. I think you think my playing poorly and acting disinterested is me being scummy, when instead it is merely my first game.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 18:59 |
|
merk posted:I think Rarity is a bad kill. Kill Keane instead. Ah poo poo, he has vig doesn't he? Taste, forcing me to claim is going to gently caress up town. Do you want that?
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 18:59 |
|
Rarity posted:I'm not playing along with this bullshit. Just go ahead and vote me, you're obviously gonna do it no matter what I say It's a vig, not a vote. I want you to provide thoughts.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 18:59 |
|
Tremendous Taste posted:It's a vig, not a vote. I want you to provide thoughts. Rarity posted:Ah poo poo, he has vig doesn't he?
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 19:01 |
|
Thoughts aren't a claim, it's my first game and even I know that.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 19:02 |
|
Claim if you think it's important, obviously I think you're bluffing but no I wouldn't want town hindered. I want you to provide reads on players.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 19:03 |
|
merk posted:I think Rarity is a bad kill. Kill Keane instead. Why
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 19:03 |
|
CCKeane posted:Thoughts aren't a claim, it's my first game and even I know that. Well he's clearly dead set on vigging me and my claim is the only thing that's going to stop him.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 19:03 |
|
Tremendous Taste posted:Claim if you think it's important, obviously I think you're bluffing but no I wouldn't want town hindered. I want you to provide reads on players. I've been providing reads on players this whole game. You should know that, you did check my post history. I want to hear what merk has to say to your question before any claim.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 19:05 |
|
Rarity posted:I've been providing reads on players this whole game. You should know that, you did check my post history. And I loved it so much! Perhaps I'm asking for something more
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 19:08 |
|
I already made my case on Keane. It's based on one post. Go ahead and claim.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 19:08 |
|
Tremendous Taste posted:And I loved it so much! Perhaps I'm asking for something more Well I've made a bunch of cases more detailed than anything you've offered so I don't really know what you want from me
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 19:09 |
|
merk posted:I already made my case on Keane. It's based on one post. Go ahead and claim. Man if you're town here I'll eat my fruit hat
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 19:10 |
|
merk posted:I already made my case on Keane. It's based on one post. Go ahead and claim. I'm Sarah Connor, Town Doctor/Bodyguard (not sure which) Taste, you're a goddam moron.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 19:10 |
|
Rarity posted:Well I've made a bunch of cases more detailed than anything you've offered so I don't really know what you want from me the fact that they're detailed doesn't guarantee quality
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 19:10 |
|
Rarity posted:Town Doctor/Bodyguard (not sure which) what!
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 19:11 |
|
Tremendous Taste posted:Man if you're town here I'll eat my fruit hat BN claimed Travis Bickle he fits 3p way better than Dirty Harry.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 19:12 |
|
Puntification posted:BN claimed Travis Bickle he fits 3p way better than Dirty Harry. I expect several in a game this size
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 19:12 |
|
Tremendous Taste posted:what! Well my power is to protect someone but I don't know if I have the 50% chance of death that the Bodyguard has. It wasn't in my role PM but maybe Little Mac just isn't telling me.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 19:12 |
|
Rarity posted:Well my power is to protect someone but I don't know if I have the 50% chance of death that the Bodyguard has. It wasn't in my role PM but maybe Little Mac just isn't telling me. why would you assume that?
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 19:13 |
|
I think it's plausible there's two scum teams instead of 3ps - a team of street-level grunts, and a team of puppetmasters.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 19:13 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 07:22 |
|
Rarity posted:Well my power is to protect someone but I don't know if I have the 50% chance of death that the Bodyguard has. It wasn't in my role PM but maybe Little Mac just isn't telling me. list your night actions
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 19:14 |