|
ave satanas
|
#
¿
Jul 31, 2014 15:46
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 20:03 |
|
|
Robo Reagan posted:yes im sorry this is the forum where we lol at people who think they're cyber dragons, people who think reagan was christ, and people who can't look at a YT video of cats without being triggered Robo Reagan posted:unless a doctor sits down and tells them this poo poo hey uh i have some bad news for u bro this is what satanists want
|
|
#
¿
Aug 1, 2014 06:52
|
|
|
CrowsNestMutineer posted:Satanists sometimes do good stuff, like when they fight religiously motivated misogynist "informed consent" laws or troll fundamentalists who insist that their religion (but only theirs!) be enshrined in law, but if you actually read the tenets of LaVeyan Satanism, they're almost exactly the same as Randian Objectivism. And vice versa. john galt is literally an antichrist that is to say he embodies the polar opposite of what christ stood for so while rand paul openly endorses that poo poo, the catholic church is busy chasing after liberal nuns and faggots 
|
|
#
¿
Aug 1, 2014 19:21
|
|
|
Robo Reagan posted:no, antichrist is the one person nobody would believe would be the antichrist according to the bible the idea that antichrist is an individual rather than a state of moral failure is a pleasant fiction brewed up by heretics in an attempt to deflect the accusation
|
|
#
¿
Aug 1, 2014 19:55
|
|
|
Kyrie eleison posted:this is correct, there is no singular 'antichrist' in the bible, there are only antichrists who are people who preach a false gospel. to be fair both paul and BoR mention a singular antichrist who will rise up against christ, but BoR is not literal and i wouldnt take paul at face value either
|
|
#
¿
Aug 1, 2014 20:36
|
|
|
Kyrie eleison posted:i hate to be technical, but... the word 'antichrist' is ONLY used in the letters of john, specifically 1 john 2:18-23, 4:3, and 2 john 1:7. neither paul nor revelation uses that word. in other places 'pseudochrists' or 'false messiahs' or 'false prophets' are mentioned such as in matthew 24:24 and mark 13:22. paul talks of the 'lawless one' in 2 thessalonians 2. the bit in revelation 13 refers to the Beast as a singular entity but this is not the word antichrist. and now im reading papers re: bible translations biblechat is so much fun with you around 
|
|
#
¿
Aug 1, 2014 23:07
|
|
|
milktwice posted:satanists use contemporary issue to attention seek so everyone can see how they are sweet edgemasters in taking 'hail satan' to a new level sorry that statue they commissioned is sicknasty all sins are forgiven 
|
|
#
¿
Aug 1, 2014 23:35
|
|
|
naem posted:Why are goats evil again? They seem pretty chill jesus said a thing once, unwashed peasants and barely literate texan conmen dont get nuance
|
|
#
¿
Aug 1, 2014 23:47
|
|
|
Six-Of-Hearts posted:This seems like more words than necessary to describe one group of people only one of the two groups has ever touched a bible
|
|
#
¿
Aug 1, 2014 23:51
|
|
|
Kyrie eleison posted:it is 666 in most manuscripts but 616 in a few. most scholars think it is a numerical reference to a roman emperor (nero), and that may be true, but i have a personal theory that 666 is also an intentional reference to Solomon (!) who received 666 talents of gold a year in taxes (1 kings 10:14) and lived an extremely lavish lifestyle with many wives and consorts. this is the only other place in the bible this distinctive number is mentioned, and solomon, though he built the first temple and is commonly praised and regarded as very wise, is condemned by god in the bible in 1 kings 11:1-13, and blamed for the split of the kingdom. he committed THE chief sin: infidelity to god, idolatry, such as following the idols of Astarte and Milcom, and even building worship sites to Chemosh and Molech! given how much jews and early christians loved their numerology, i can totally imagine the writer(s) realizing that 666 can refer to two assholes and fistpumping ever so slightly in the name of the lord
|
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2014 00:06
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2014 16:02
|
|
|
SirEvelynTremble posted:Christian uses hobby lobby thread to troll Satanists he knows exactly how the worst kind of vatican apologist sounds he even got the whole cite-who/cdc-against-condoms thing right 10/10 would get trolled again
|
|
#
¿
Aug 3, 2014 22:07
|
|
|
Who What Now posted:Watching you dig a hole deeper and deeper about how you know nothing about statistics is the best thing I've seen today. im dead serious that is exactly what vatican apologists with a soul(read: ones who think niggers are people) sound like its amazing
|
|
#
¿
Aug 3, 2014 22:13
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 20:03 |
|
|
Literally The Worst posted:progressives: bigger assholes than the people who want to restrict the rights of others why cant you just be tolerant of my religion  but not the ragheads gently caress those guys you can keep hatin em
|
|
#
¿
Aug 4, 2014 00:57
|
|