|
I don't even remember what's going on in this game after the audio sidetrack. RAND PAUL 2016
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 04:44 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 00:08 |
|
i'm a tracker, yuming is a watcher, capps is confirmed town hotdog peddler, ernie is town
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 04:46 |
|
I don't remember capps being confirmed town, must have missed that.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 04:47 |
|
Ernie's not actually ~confirmed town~, I'd imagine there's a theme in the scum abilities where each one knocks out one of their power roles for them. Which makes JakeP a pretty bizarre NK.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 04:49 |
|
mr.capps posted:read my post history dummy mr.capps posted:why would you even track me mr.capps posted:i give people hotdogs, they then can give people hotdogs mr.capps posted:i have been practically confirmed 3 times over at this point mr.capps posted:explain the exact thought process that went through your head where you thought "i should track the guy who claims to be the person to visit people with hotdogs, which ernie confirmed he was visited by, and the dead mafia role that makes people vegetarians seems to work as a foil to" mr.capps posted:so the scum have a role that makes people vegetarians and the scum have a role that hands people hotdogs clear as day imo
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 04:49 |
|
Pinterest Mom posted:clear as day imo yeah. well Opop ain't doing the nightkill if he's making me hated, unless he's allowed to do 2 things
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 04:51 |
|
It's Ernie, I had a scum read on him D1 and the only reason I changed my mind was windy's thing and a town result, the Little Mac and JakeP kills make the most sense from him, and with the information from these last two flips I feel like a cop result is pretty meaningless. Plus everyone else has night actions so it's him or derp is giving two night actions. I hereby declare this a Slamdunk Monolith Thunderdome (tm). ##vote Ernie
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 05:05 |
|
Plus apparently he was a vegetarian from the start of the game instead of getting it from windy, so that's pretty weird.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 05:08 |
|
Also also, what happened to your meta defense of Opop between it and voting him yesterday?
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 05:17 |
|
Ixtlilton posted:Also also, what happened to your meta defense of Opop between it and voting him yesterday?
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 05:26 |
|
Juanito posted:Huh, I don't completely understand the question It's for Ernie, not you.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2014 05:27 |
|
hey, what's happening
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 00:18 |
|
yuming do you have a result?
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 00:18 |
|
No one visited Ernie last night. We should lynch Opop for his switch on wind.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 02:08 |
|
What switch?
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 03:53 |
|
uranus posted:how did i forget that 'cheese and crackers' was an actual line said by a soldier in the movie when talking about dozens of dead bodies lying in a road. this movie Please put that in my flavour when I die tia
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 03:53 |
|
Q: Does it make sense for scum to kill jake (who claimed he was one-shot) instead of the tracker or the watcher?
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 14:18 |
|
What I'm saying is that Ix knew jake wasn't a one-shot cop, and now he's voting Ernie, one of Jake's two town results, because he thinks cop results don't matter anymore? ##vote ix
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 14:28 |
|
and he's using insane vegetarian/hot-dog logic, that doesn't help
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 14:29 |
|
Also this:Ixtlilton posted:Plus everyone else has night actions Ix what's your night action?
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 14:57 |
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Also this: Everyone else except me and him. Also you are literally the worst tracker I have ever seen in a game. And of course he'd tell his mason that he thought was town instead of the whole thread. Either lynch me or him today, but if you lynch me you'd better lynch him tomorrow.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 17:29 |
|
And read the flips, each scum role neutralizes a town PR, the last one neutralizing the cop makes total sense. So no, a town result doesn't matter.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 17:40 |
|
Yeah ok. We can start with you and just lynch Ernie, then Opop, then capps from there. Eventually we'll win~.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 17:53 |
|
Don't lynch capps he's so town it's ridiculous.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 18:08 |
|
Seven people left. yuming, Juan, and I are confirmed town. Capps is the fourth scummiest person.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 18:12 |
|
How is Juanito confirmed town? If he's confirmed town Opop is confirmed town.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 18:13 |
|
yuming posted:I can also confirm Juanito visited Ernie last night. quote:dr hurt, scum alighned grass, has been mowed!
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 18:15 |
|
Oh, that actually makes sense. Cool, so if you lynch me you just have to have yuming watch you and you can track Ernie and we win. Or we can lynch him today because luckily not everyone is as bad at reading people as you.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 18:17 |
|
My vote's sticking on you. Scum killing Jake doesn't make sense if they have a cop-nullifying power. And it doesn't make sense if they believed he was one-shot (and you were the only one who knew for sure that he wasn't).
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 18:23 |
|
Pinterest Mom posted:My vote's sticking on you. I'm a claimed miller, and I could make the same argument if there were town results on everyone else if I were scum. yuming is by far the greatest threat if I were scum, and if you use a bit of critical thinking you can deduce that I didn't need to claim JakeP claimed his second result to me and that he obviously a cop would try to deflect kills by saying he was 1-shot anyway. The kill makes the most sense from Ernie because he had a town result on him and no one did that he knew of, so killing him prevents other town results from laying doubt on his. It's pretty basic.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 18:26 |
|
Also take into consideration how nonsensical the Little Mac kill is if Ernie isn't scum. Mac was probably the only person who was going to push "Only one town messenger!" at all, and he looked really scummy after the windy lynch.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 18:30 |
|
in fact, killing a messenger when there are two claimed makes sense from a scum perspective, and killing a cop makes sense if there are no godfathers also you trying to break the game based on claims vs. actions vs. scum-flips falls apart when you realize i had a confirm-able night action if you want me to claim the other night action i have i can, i just haven't used it yet that said, ##vote ixt the best counter for a cop is easily an unconfirmed mason who finds out all the cop's results and can steer them around
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 19:08 |
|
That post was basically Ernie scumclaiming, btw.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 19:20 |
|
Here's an idea: hammer ix before Ernie posts his recording. Two birds.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 19:24 |
|
Let me break it down for you.Ernie. posted:in fact, killing a messenger when there are two claimed makes sense from a scum perspective, and killing a cop makes sense if there are no godfathers 1. Ernie is smarter than this sentence. 2. You only had a confirmable night action 1 night, that means nothing. 3. Yeah, you should probably fullclaim. 4. Ernie is still smarter than this, his only argument is setup based when he's on me for solving the setup, and he realizes that my actions this game make no sense from a scum perspective but he's voting me anyway.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 19:24 |
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Here's an idea: hammer ix before Ernie posts his recording. Two birds. oh i forgot that that was a thing
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 19:28 |
|
Ixtlilton posted:Yeah, you should probably fullclaim. I'm also a doctor
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 19:29 |
|
I can radio in a medic
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 19:30 |
|
that said, it's ixt
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 19:30 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 00:08 |
|
So what you're saying is that we have a doctor/watcher/tracker triangle is what you're saying? Also it's really obviously not me if you read the game and I'm pretty sure you know that.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2014 19:32 |