|
Meinberg posted:god DAMNIT meinberg Good casework ##vote Meinberg
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2014 00:38
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 23, 2024 19:31 |
|
|
Meinberg posted:rude 
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2014 00:40
|
|
|
Meinberg posted:Hey buddy, how are you doing? Having a good time? Yeah, you reacted to jokes really weird in Civ 2 as... well... But you were scum in that game!  We're through the looking glass here people.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2014 09:06
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:Rarity i'm bored let's chat What would you like to chat about Tastu-chan?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2014 09:11
|
|
|
Meinberg posted:Hm, you know... thinking on it, I can think of someone else who was scum in Civ2. In this very thread!!! Hey man, it's not Jake's fault. He has a condition.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2014 09:12
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:you watching football today :0 I will probably be reading Marvel comics from 1969. No Jan, don't marry the man who just sexually assaulted you. This is how domestic abuse happens 
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2014 09:16
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:Also I hear classic Dr. Strange really holds up Yeah, the art is way ahead of its time and the stories are good too. Meinberg, why you gotta be like that, man?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2014 09:24
|
|
|
Meinberg posted:Indeed it is. It's a pretty great name. Is it true your real name is Meinberg von Scumm?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2014 09:32
|
|
|
Confirmed as Meinberg von Skumm. Wrap it up people, we're done here.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2014 09:36
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:It's Meinberg Jones isn't it Meinberg Meinberg
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2014 09:40
|
|
|
winvirus posted:I'm fully convinced 1-2 of Meinberg, rarity and capitalistpig are scum. So we should go ahead and uh. Take care of that, y'all Why? You realise this is jokephase, right?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2014 16:08
|
|
|
Ecco, can we get a vote count in the OP please?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2014 16:09
|
|
|
chaoslord posted:I'm dead in the Wire. You're welcome.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2014 16:21
|
|
|
winvirus posted:"ooh ho ho ho anything i say doesn't matter it's joke!!" - scum, every time, every game, forever. What is this argument I don't even know
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2014 16:38
|
|
|
I think the rush of votes on Meinberg are scummy but I think the weakest vote is this one:kilran posted:I know it's joke phase but this is a weird reaction to WV clear joke. I feel like kilran's over-explaining in an attempt to justify jumping on a jokey bandwagon when it wasn't really necessary and he's using a general weak point of Meinberg to do it. ##unvote ##vote kilran
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2014 19:13
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:Rarity that's not a good vote. What do you think about wins? Well, his case on me is dumb and he thinks Meinberg is scum because... reasons, I guess? But I think he's being a bit too obviously sketchy out of the gates to be scum.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2014 19:30
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:I'm sorry, what? Can you explain any part of that last sentence because it doesn't make any sense. He's acting so scummy that he must be town is not something I can follow. I think scum are more likely to be laying low at the moment than they are to be making themselves into targets.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2014 20:07
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:shall we kill What's that about glass houses and stones?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2014 20:29
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:Did you seriously just call me a lurker? I've never lurked a single SA game in my life ole' chap and I don't intend to now. Especially given how much ecco laments his games becoming lurker fests You've been quiet so far. Admittedly, you're not the only one and the game's still fresh. I only noticed cause it's not like you.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2014 20:37
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:Anyway your original argument is crap. I've read games where winvirus has done both behaviors and we have a few people in this game who are more than capable of playing aggressive scum if they want I've already made it clear who I want to lynch. It's the guy I'm voting for!
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2014 20:39
|
|
|
kilran posted:For you see, mine was the first vote on Meinberg. Actually I think you'll find that was me? Back on page 1? Go ahead and check, I'll wait. You were the 4th person to vote Meinberg (after me, winvirus and Ras if you must know) It's cool, I accept apologies by postcards.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2014 01:17
|
|
|
kilran posted:
Yeah, I was expecting something like that as a response from you. I'm not entirely sure what to make of it because it would be a pretty neat way of avoiding suspicion for scum. I will give you the benefit of the doubt and ##unvote for now. But I'll be keeping an eye on you, buddy! I agree with others that Ras is looking suspect at the moment. I'm also a bit put off by CCKeane, I don't like him using his recent D1 deaths to plea for survival. Conversely, I like Somber's effort and I feel like he's town.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2014 08:37
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:I die a lot and it is very annoying! People are very intimidated by my good looks and kill me as a result! I normally die early too, you don't see me angling for sympathy points.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2014 10:47
|
|
|
Crazyeyes posted:I have no idea how CCKeane is "pleaing for his life", though. At most he is being obstinate with his Winvirus vote refusal (which doesn't matter anyway cause he is in no danger of being lynched). CCKeane posted:Also I have died a lot day one so please nobody kill me thank you and good night.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2014 15:32
|
|
|
Dammit Opop I spent thirty seconds finding that quote.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2014 15:32
|
|
|
Bloody colonials
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2014 15:39
|
|
|
winvirus posted:"ooh ho ho ho anything i say doesn't matter it's joke!!" - scum, every time, every game, forever. winvirus, if it's ok for you to defend yourself for jokeposting then why is it scummy when I do the same?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2014 17:27
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:Nobody is ever going to seriously say someone is scum based on voting Meinberg within the joke phase. That's fake play and everyone knows it. It's Meinberg goddamnit. kilran's vote was serious though.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2014 18:18
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:Yeah I'm starting to feel you might have been right after his admission post and his last post about me knowing alignments to justify my reads. Something feels really wrong from him. Admitting he was mistaken about being the Meinberg vote was the only thing he could do, so it comes down to whether he was legit about not noticing those earlier votes. I've never seen scum try such a brazen defence of a vote, the normal reactions are to double down or get wishy-washy. So like I said, I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt for now and seeing what else he says.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2014 18:32
|
|
|
kilran posted:2. Rascyc adds a me too vote. First you miss votes that are there, now you see votes that never were!
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2014 18:55
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:I think he's referring to my Meinberg vote. Then why does it say it happened after he voted for me?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2014 18:57
|
|
|
Still, I am finding your interaction with us a little off. It's like you're trying to play us against each other. Tell you what, let's open this up a little. Ras, what do you think of winvirus?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2014 19:03
|
|
|
I agree that Keane doesn't seem like he's trying. His votes in particular are totally non-effort. ##vote Keane
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2014 20:17
|
|
|
winvirus posted:How are you (and the two others dead set on lynchjng me) blatantly ignoring the 100% serious vote and poo poo I made on Meinberg and my actual opinions in favor of a clear joke. You can tell it's a joke, because holy poo poo, do you really think I'm defending little mac as town on the basis that he thinks I'm town Hey winvirus, can you answer this question please? I'd be dreadfully grateful! Rarity posted:winvirus, if it's ok for you to defend yourself for jokeposting then why is it scummy when I do the same?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2014 21:22
|
|
|
winvirus posted:You can make jokes in mafia game but I felt your joke was scummy Please show me which joke in particular you are referring to, as opposed to the rest of the jokes I made.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2014 21:43
|
|
|
Keane it sounds like you need a hug. Somebody give him a hug
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2014 22:44
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:I'm suspicious of rarity because merk's case is bonkers stupid and while I can understand somebody making a bonkers stupid case, agreeing with a bonkers stupid case is suspicious imo. You're forgetting that I was already suspicious of you before merk made his case.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2014 23:20
|
|
|
merk is flailing hard. Beyond what yuming has said, switching his vote between Keane, Ras and CE so fast makes me think he doesn't have any real conviction behind his cases. ##unvote ##vote merk
|
|
#
¿
Aug 18, 2014 07:14
|
|
|
winvirus posted:Also I think it's really cool + scummy how Rarity wordlessly drops pursuing me in favor of a bad merk vote. In fact, I think I now prefer a Rarity lynch over Meinberg Actually, you never answered the last question I asked you. It's not like I just forgot about you. I'm allowed to think more than one person is scum, you know.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 18, 2014 16:01
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 23, 2024 19:31 |
|
|
Somberbrero posted:rarity - "I'm allowed to think that more than one person is scum!" "merk keeps switching his vote." There's a difference between having a few people you suspect and switching your vote twice in the space of three minutes. winvirus, it was this: winvirus posted:You can make jokes in mafia game but I felt your joke was scummy Rarity posted:Please show me which joke in particular you are referring to, as opposed to the rest of the jokes I made.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 18, 2014 18:04
|
|