|
I wanted to play as Ordos
|
# ¿ Sep 3, 2014 19:07 |
|
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2024 14:39 |
|
I chose some stats, they're probably ok!
|
# ¿ Sep 3, 2014 21:54 |
|
aw man I missed joke phase and insult phase
|
# ¿ Sep 4, 2014 20:00 |
|
JakeP posted:No you didnt apparently I didn't and that's probably the best day 1 case I've ever seen ##vote cpig
|
# ¿ Sep 4, 2014 20:03 |
|
oh, I'm an idiot, hm? would an idiot ##unvote at this point?! I think so!
|
# ¿ Sep 4, 2014 20:05 |
|
Meinberg posted:Good morning everyone. Good evening! Yeah, this has been a poo poo week, so I was genuinely sorry to miss joke phase. Due to my timezone + general inability to post from work, I've still not got the hang of "getting back to the thread" - so I had fun for a few posts.
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2014 17:11 |
|
50 pounds of bread posted:What the gently caress is a meinberg anyway? This is a bad vote ##vote 50 This is a slightly better vote
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2014 17:32 |
|
anime gently caress pillow posted:Please explain, and then give me another person you'd consider voting and why! It's a lazy "me too!"-vote on Meinberg. An anti-case I made basically while reading the case/checking the background: Meinberg posted:I feel really dumb for being so certain about the lynchproof nature of the team leads. I could have sworn that this was mentioned somewhere, but upon looking back, I can see that this information is nowhere to be found. While it says nowhere that the ruler is lynchproof, the rules thread says quote:You win the game when the rival thread's Ruler is eliminated. The best way to kill the enemy ruler is to reduce the population of the enemy thread in battle (and through other means, if available) as fast as possible. Rulers may not take the field themselves until they cannot assign 5 other players to battle, at which point they MUST assign themselves to battle and MUST be in the front rank. However, given that mr.capps posted:Thread leaders are told who the other thread's scum team are. and we can even send them messages at night.
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2014 17:53 |
|
MAFIA EDIT: ...and that would be a strange way to potentially end the game on day 1.
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2014 17:54 |
|
CCKeane posted:Yeah I agree with AFP on Somber, I've gotten THE WEIRD VIBES there as well. I've not played with them enough to really have a feeling, and every time (since I got back) where I accuse someone of being scummy I get "no no that's just how they play" back That being said, I'm leaning town on Lumpen for now - trying to break the voting system like that doesn't really seem like a scum play.
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2014 18:03 |
|
Somberbrero posted:I disagree with that last part. Mechanics discussion is one of the easiest part of scum play generally, especially when there are multiple systems in a game. It's objective, it's real content, it's not generally focused on scum hunting, and it usually makes you look good. Even such "controversial" mechanics discussion?
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2014 18:16 |
|
In that case I retract my defense of Lumpen
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2014 18:22 |
|
OK, it wasn't much of a defense, more like a "meh, prob town I guess?"
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2014 18:23 |
|
anime gently caress pillow posted:Between the post I quoted a second ago and this one, I see two thoughts I can't see someone having. I condensed a lot of thinking into those few lines. Generally I try to explain my thought process leading up to the (if a bit tentative) conclusion. To me, it seemed (at the time) weird that you'd not be lynchproof (though I based some of that on unreliable information from capps). I started out looking for a simple case on Meinberg, but convinced myself otherwise rather quickly. As an extension of that, I found 50s vote a bit too easy...
|
# ¿ Sep 7, 2014 19:24 |
|
Meinberg posted:I think dorkanoid is more likely to be scum. His "joke phase" vote and unvote feel very sketchy to me, like he put a vote on a target he thought was an easy target, but then unvoted once he realized there really wasn't any momentum behind it. I unvoted 2 minutes later. Hardly any time for any momentum to build. How fast should I unvote to make it a clear joke vote?
|
# ¿ Sep 7, 2014 20:02 |
|
Puntification posted:Since you are here, please post some reads and/or cases. Meinberg posted:Reading PM, she seems very genuine to me. Last I read the thread I think PM had 4-5 posts, mostly joke phase. I don't see how the posts since then are "genuine"; while I agree with Pinterest Mom posted:but yeah i agree re: fiddy's vote on meinberg, that looks precision-engineered to be a vote that sticks around unnoticed, only to be defended as "oh it was a joke vote i forgot to take off" after/if meinberg flips town. there are just a few loose opinions, and an Ix vote based on the prompting by AFP, I have no problem with ##vote PM. I note that the post quoted above had no vote attached, so I don't mind switching back to 22.7kg
|
# ¿ Sep 7, 2014 20:06 |
|
General warning (though I doubt it matters): Deadline is something like 3 AM here, so I have to lock in my vote for the night in a few hours. I'm very ranged, but I doubt that matters, too.
|
# ¿ Sep 7, 2014 20:09 |
|
Rarity posted:I really don't like how when asked to case someone you immediately target the person diqnol's Thunderdomed you with. It reeks of self-preservation. Well, a little bit, I must admit - but it was the quoted part of Meinberg's post that triggered me to read PM.
|
# ¿ Sep 7, 2014 20:24 |
|
I also think Juanito is seeming to try to stay below the radar; some soft town reads Juanito posted:I think Lumpen is town. And I've defended chaoslord in multiple games because his posts seem noob scummy (even though he's been town), but this time I really don't think he's town. Juanito posted:I really don't know. His av looks evil, so there's that. One of his posts makes me think we should leave him alive? But I don't want to point it out.. no scum picks, no suspicion, just a weird vote sequence on Ixt: Juanito posted:##vote Ixt Juanito posted:Oh right Juanito posted:##vote Ixt Juanito posted:So am I supposed to unvote Ixt? Would vote Juanito.
|
# ¿ Sep 7, 2014 20:32 |
|
I try, since I haven't been around long enough to have "can skip day 1" as my meta.
|
# ¿ Sep 7, 2014 21:12 |
|
dorkanoid posted:I try, since I haven't been around long enough to have "can skip day 1" as my meta. Not that I want to; this was a not-so-subtle lurker callout.
|
# ¿ Sep 7, 2014 21:13 |
|
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2024 14:39 |
|
it's late; I'm leaving my vote where it is, as anything else seems to be a dead vote at the moment.
|
# ¿ Sep 7, 2014 22:20 |