|
Yeah go on then.
|
#
¿
Sep 21, 2014 22:44
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 16, 2024 17:30 |
|
|
I'm sure you'll both master the toilet someday grandi and opop.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 22, 2014 03:29
|
|
|
Confirming (that I'm about to go to bed).
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2014 03:44
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:feel free to vote no lynch first friend Oh go on then since you asked nicely  ##vote no lynch
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2014 04:01
|
|
|
Rarity posted:Ok, let's actually do some scum hunting. I said that voting along with no lynch is scummy and out of those three players I pick... If you look at my confirmation post you might be able to puzzle out the reason for my lack of comments.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2014 14:00
|
|
|
Isn't the mr man called mr nobody?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2014 14:01
|
|
|
Jedit posted:So you're claiming to be Mr Lazy. Paging Mr Rolecop to the thread, cleanup required on page 4. If it's lazy to try to go to bed before 1am on a work night, I guess I am.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2014 14:16
|
|
|
Rarity posted:...Fair point. Well mostly I thought it was funny but it does seem like a possible meta for taste and it also doesn't seem like that great a gambit for scum to pull just to buy an extra NK. I'm a little concerned he got the name wrong now that I'm actually paying attention though.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2014 14:28
|
|
|
apostateCourier posted:I don't know. I'd believe that TT looked at his PM once, and forgot the name by the time he posted what the name was. Well it's not like I'm voting him for it.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2014 14:46
|
|
|
Why is jon joe's vote to no lynch worse than mine or asinna's?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2014 16:08
|
|
|
Your Personal Muse posted:I am inclined to agree with Jedit on this subject. I would rather kill TT than help him win. What if the game ends instead of him absconding? There is a risk in no lynching and no risk in lynching. I kind of doubt opop made a game where we could end d1. Even if we do agree to no-lynch or lynch taste, there's nothing stopping us from waiting until deadline to do it, there's not an either or proposition to us no-lynching/voting taste and playing the rest of d1. Somb, I find your position on Jedit compelling he's doing a lot of speculation on a claim that he doesn't believe and possibly (not so)subtly trying to direct PRs onto taste. Grandi's posts definitely have drive-by feel to them, his latest one with a vote which he may explain latter isn't exactly winning him any favour with me. Not as sold on jon joe though.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2014 17:32
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:I reread Rarity and I have no idea how Grandi could think she's scum this game. He makes a bad point in a very bad way. I totally agree with his, Grandi needs to justify his vote on her.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2014 18:44
|
|
|
Jedit posted:"That vote had terrible, faked justification." She's mentioned him repeatedly and dedicated a whole post to her listed reasons of why she thinks he's scummy, come on, to say rarity's given no justification for her vote on mmm is a complete misrepresentation of the facts. ##vote jedit
|
|
#
¿
Sep 24, 2014 14:14
|
|
|
So I spent all of last night drawing fetishes and children's tv characters, it was for fanfic mafia not my own personal enjoyment fyi, sorry about that. busb posted:Friends let's ignore the 3P nonsense and lynch a scum - MMM - who is seeking to coast on a miller claim. Agreed - a claimed miller who would rather we focus on 3P than scum hunt, as d1 cases go that's a pretty strong one. ##vote mmm
|
|
#
¿
Sep 25, 2014 13:26
|
|
|
Hey somb, would you be willing to vote mmm today?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 25, 2014 18:28
|
|
|
MildManeredManikin posted:Scum could easily vote no lynch with you at lylo, giving you your wincon and them theirs. It's the combo of miller claim and this post: MildManeredManikin posted:Well, the big difference to me is that the player we all think is scum doesn't exist, but we know TT is 3p. It's actively discouraging scum hunting in favour of 3P and this is scummy behaviour in my opinion, as I did the exact thing as scum. Also I don't like the way you say we know TT is 3P, he's claimed it and that's different, this is a semantic quibble but potentially it speaks of a more informed viewpoint regarding alignment, this last point is rather silly and I wouldn't really consider it if not for the other points being sufficient to think you're scum already.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 25, 2014 22:08
|
|
|
Jedit posted:Voting to no lynch is definitely worse for Town than voting for you, and that's not ideal either. I wouldn't be surprised if the scum are doing it right now; it's almost better for them than a mislynch, because it's harder to attach blame and there's no need to justify it. So you no longer think he's a jester?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 25, 2014 23:29
|
|
|
I am tempted myself to be honest. Split between that and suggesting we bumrush jedit.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 25, 2014 23:43
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:I cannot support any violence this day when pacifism will bring such joy As a show of good faith maybe you could give some opinions about evil-doers and n'erdowells in the game?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 25, 2014 23:56
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:I think people other than me trying to make this about me are p fishy I also think this so I'm willing to believe you are on the level. ##vote no lynch To expand on this I'm currently still suspicious of MMM for previously stated reasons but I'm impatient and not seeing any forward movement on this so would happily wait and indulge taste first and go forward tomorrow with the added info of the taste's claim being verified (or not) and the NK. I'm also suspicious of jedit's hyperbole regarding how bad a no lynch would be for town as well as his pre-emptive overly defensiveness about being asleep during the deadline, given that he's not the only UK-based player and had zero votes at the time, seemed rather needless. Grandi is still phoning it in but it's not been a high effort game on most people's part so far, by most people I mean myself so while I'd be willing to vote him generally speaking it'd be after MMM and/or jedit ideally. I currently feel pretty good about somb and rarity, everyone else are ok to neutral on the old puntifiscope (my patented scum detector). I'm gonna go off and play computer games for a bit and will be back before the deadline.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 26, 2014 00:30
|
|
|
busb posted:i super hate this post because you point out MMM, Grandi, jedt, as scummy but then just settle on the anti-town nolynch. I like to make my positions known but I don't think I can argue them strongly enough to sway people and would rather wait for a situation with more information to move forward. I think the anti-townness of the no-lynch is massively over-exaggerated and would rather be nice to taste than lynch him until such time as he's shown to be a liar. busb posted:also puntification your name would be better id it started with a 'c' hope this helps. This is the same joke Magnus Gallant made in the dune game but done less well.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 26, 2014 02:27
|
|
|
 lol
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2014 22:29
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 16, 2024 17:30 |
|
|
Still feels like a victory to me cos taste got his no-lynch. Thanks opop, you run great games I'm always on the losing side of! Good job scum, on the other hand way to let the side down town.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2014 05:06
|
|