|
I'm pumped for another game, get me in on this!
|
#
¿
Sep 21, 2014 22:34
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 19:18 |
|
|
Confirmed.Tremendous Taste posted:1) hardly representative of the majority Agreed. That was scum rolling over and accepting their fates for some reason. busb posted:nolynching today merely delays the entire game by a day and reduces our numbers. tomorrow becomes a day1 with less people and no information to go on. It also gets us to an odd number which would make me feel more comfortable. Not that it would actually matter insofar as the game, but hey.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2014 14:11
|
|
|
Puntification posted:Well mostly I thought it was funny but it does seem like a possible meta for taste and it also doesn't seem like that great a gambit for scum to pull just to buy an extra NK. I'm a little concerned he got the name wrong now that I'm actually paying attention though. I don't know. I'd believe that TT looked at his PM once, and forgot the name by the time he posted what the name was.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2014 14:36
|
|
|
Asiina posted:I absolutely believe TT's claim. It fits in with his meta perfectly. Also I don't believe scum would make this kind of gambit. There's no reason for it. So given that he's telling the truth, what are the options? Holy crap, we agree on something.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2014 16:29
|
|
|
MildManeredManikin posted:It is in town's best interest to remove a 3P and Day one is a good time to do it. Agreed. Plus, I feel like being a nice person and ##vote nolynch ing.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2014 16:40
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:
He won because of it, too. That's actually really cool.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 26, 2014 16:50
|
|
Taste was too gentle for this world.
|
MildManeredManikin posted:Looking back, I'm actually suspicious of punt for these posts: [bolding here is mine] This is actually fine on its own but I also noticed that here: He basically uses the same logic that he said was scummy in my post earlier. That wouldn't be too bad if he didn't specifically say that he thought it was scummy because it's something he's done as scum. That says to me that he either literally described the game he's playing in this thread or it says that he didn't honestly interpret my earlier post when he described it as discouraging scum hunting. More reads coming up in a bit as I work through the thread. [/quote] Looking for inconsistencies isn't looking for scummy behavior? Also good job casing a dead townie.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2014 22:40
|
|
|
Your Personal Muse posted:I forgot you were in this game apostate, but I'm pretty sure I remember thinking you were scum. Yeah... I was more focused on the game that has my screen name in the title.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2014 23:22
|
|
|
Your Personal Muse posted:Will you fuckers stop dismissing my case before apostate responds to it? That was the whole point. Uggghghghghgh I hate you all When I gently caress up and don't pay enough attention to a game, I feel bad. End of reasoning for that post.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 05:08
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:hello we have seven hours and i am frustrated, please vote someone. Christ, I did it again and paid a bunch of attention to your game.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2014 21:12
|
|
|
##vote busb
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2014 21:12
|
|
|
busb posted:No. ##vote apostate Oh. Well then. ##unvote
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2014 21:20
|
|
|
busb posted:It could have been rarity or me that caused the nokill. scum have no way of knowing just yet. I'd be tempted to ask rarity not to divulge her protection target as well as myself in order to keep us alive but i dunno. Hmmm I doubt it was you.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2014 04:38
|
|
|
MildManeredManikin posted:Go on. Well, I can tell you that busb didn't do the kill, either.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2014 11:09
|
|
|
busb posted:Eh it seems likely at this point i wouldn't even end up getting targetted by scum. i'm 1shot bulletproof, fakeclaimed doc for above reasons on how likely i thought the real doc would counterclaim and to hopefully draw the scumkill. Well, I definitely wasted my night action last night then.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2014 11:20
|
|
|
Jedit posted:The NK? No. I'd rather not divulge the exact mechanics behind my role.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2014 12:03
|
|
|
Family stopped by unexpectedly. Yeah I would've re-voted busb after the counterclaim if I'd had the chance. ##vote busb
|
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2014 13:03
|
|
|
##unvote So many rooooooooooles
|
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2014 17:56
|
|
|
Busb: I'm not a tracker.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2014 18:04
|
|
|
busb posted:If you're not a tracker i don't know how you can definitively say i didn't attempt the nightkill apostate but whatever. Okay sure. ##vote YPM
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2014 01:54
|
|
|
busb posted:Maybe if we're lucky ypm is the scum roleblocker~ Well, I suppose it's possible if you're both bulletproof and performed the NK.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2014 02:14
|
|
|
busb posted:You've either claimed tracker or roleblocker or some sort of halfway role of either. So you know i didn't go anywhere by knowing i couldn't have gone anywhere because you stopped me having an action, or because you saw me never go anywhere. Basically, I pick someone, and redirect their action. I targeted you, and made you target yourself for whatever it is you did (if anything).
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2014 02:52
|
|
|
I doubt that busb is both bulletproof and a godfather. Hence my vote on YPM instead of busb.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2014 03:24
|
|
|
apostateCourier posted:I doubt that busb is both bulletproof and a godfather. Hence my vote on YPM instead of busb. Wait that makes no sense. Uuuugh
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2014 03:24
|
|
|
apostateCourier posted:Wait that makes no sense. Uuuugh Either way my brain's dying and I don't think busb is scum at the moment.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2014 03:27
|
|
|
MildManeredManikin posted:My though is that if you use it on the killing scum they die, which strikes me as unbalanced. Using it against town players messes up their action but doesn't ruin them. The thing is, I don't have to pick the same person for both things. I can move anyone's action to anyone else.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2014 06:40
|
|
|
MildManeredManikin posted:aC tell me what you think about magnus? I'd vote him. I don't buy his reasoning behind the mmm casing punt thing. He seems to be all over the place.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2014 07:19
|
|
|
Asiina posted:So let us not wait for deadline to decide to either vote or talk about things. I'm okay with this vote. ##vote YPM
|
|
#
¿
Oct 5, 2014 22:53
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:Yes, let's just drop votes like crazy in what could well be LYLO. I'm okay with this.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 5, 2014 23:00
|
|
|
Magnus Gallant posted:Man I'm awesome. Nah. I've been nothing but honest.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2014 13:50
|
|
|
Magnus Gallant posted:Maybe. I'll re-read you, but don't hold your breath. That's not good for you. Hey, that's cool. I mean, if I guess who does the nightkill one night, I'll be happy, and maybe cleared? 'Cause they'll die. And no one else will unless there's a vig/SK.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2014 14:05
|
|
|
MildManeredManikin posted:Hal and I are masons and I am positive he's scum, I'm leaving work now and will be home in an hour or less to chat about it. Well, if he's scum there's at least two left. He didn't do the kill.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 10, 2014 04:19
|
|
|
Jedit posted:Then the kill was MMM, Somber or Magnus - assuming you can confirm you're Tracker. Even if Hal is scum, we shouldn't lynch anyone not on that list today. Jedit, I've described my role already. I redirect a person's action to whomever I choose. I've been picking people I've quietly thought are scummy, and making them do whatever they're doing to themselves. If I guess right, a scum suicides.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 10, 2014 13:14
|
|
|
Jedit posted:I remember now. I'm on my phone so without full reference. Same difference, though; unless you're lying about at least one of your role or your target, you can't be scum. Can anything you've claimed be verified? I don't believe it can be, since I don't get to see any results that aren't public knowledge anyway (deaths).
|
|
#
¿
Oct 10, 2014 13:51
|
|
|
Jedit posted:No, it isn't. We have exactly the same odds of killing scum today as we do tomorrow. Her. I'm trying to figure out how we know we have a town roleblocker, though. When did we figure that out?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2014 13:22
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 19:18 |
|
|
Jedit posted:Because they let the cop investigate after blocking them. Okay. That makes sense.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2014 14:58
|
|