|
Sure
|
# ¿ Sep 22, 2014 01:25 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 24, 2024 16:56 |
|
Magnus Gallant posted:Hi Grandi! How's Grandi jr? He's great. Potty training is hard.
|
# ¿ Sep 22, 2014 01:42 |
|
Opopanax posted:We started to potty train but decided to abandon ship until we get the move sorted out This is potty training redux. We tried a couple of months ago and he wasn't ready.
|
# ¿ Sep 22, 2014 02:58 |
|
Confirmation post, also Mags is town. TT is 3rd party and I don't care to help him with his wincondition. That is all.
|
# ¿ Sep 23, 2014 05:48 |
|
I think rarity is scum. More at 11. Actually, more probably around 9, not 11, but later. But for now ##vote Rarity
|
# ¿ Sep 23, 2014 16:35 |
|
I drove by because I was at work and only had enough time to catch up to the thread, not to really post thoughts. That is why I said I'd be back now-ish, because I have put the child to bed and now am going to clarify my feelings on Rarity.
|
# ¿ Sep 24, 2014 02:14 |
|
Rarity posted:Ok, let's actually do some scum hunting. I said that voting along with no lynch is scummy and out of those three players I pick... I think it is mostly this post. She said that a thing was scummy, realized that the real scummy thing is that she didn't vote with what she said was scummy, so because she wanted to seem to uphold her town-thoughts of scum voted punt. Her stated driver of the vote is the no-lynch being scummy, and Punt was her choice out of the nolynchers because he was low content (less than 24 hours into the game). But when Punt pointed out he was low content because he went to sleep, she unvoted and dropped the no lynch thing being scummy alltogether. It feels like scum manufacturing what a town mind might want to thing without understanding why it would think that.
|
# ¿ Sep 24, 2014 02:18 |
|
I disagree?
|
# ¿ Sep 24, 2014 16:15 |
|
I might reframe my case on her at some point, or even case someone else if I see other scummy behavior, but I am not going to switch my case to someone else explicitly because you disagree with me. If you are still happy with your vote on me, I have no problem with that. Vote away. I'm a bit perplexed by that post. Are you asking me to pander to you and drop a read I think is decent just because you disagree with the read? Just because you are voting me?
|
# ¿ Sep 24, 2014 16:31 |
|
Hal Incandenza posted:I would love to have lunch with Grandi That would be quite cool. I would order a BLT.
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2014 02:55 |
|
Grandicap posted:I think it is mostly this post. She said that a thing was scummy, realized that the real scummy thing is that she didn't vote with what she said was scummy, so because she wanted to seem to uphold her town-thoughts of scum voted punt. Also, this is my vote explanation. Where in here is it me being defensive? There is a bit of me trying to define a mindset as towny or scummy, which is always hard to convey. But what is defensive somber?
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2014 02:57 |
|
Like, I don't think somber is scummy for this. His going after me for this and then doubling down is done in a town way. I am just legit confused.
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2014 02:59 |
|
##vote TT Rarity isn't happening, mostly because I haven't been around enough to push it hard, I'm sleepy and still at work so I am pressing the lazy button.
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2014 23:03 |
|
Not what I meant. I meant ##vote no lynch
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2014 23:04 |
|
A vote for TT's win condition. I have a case of the very sleepies.
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2014 23:04 |
|
FYI I have requested a replacement. Sorry to everyone. Mostly to Opop.
|
# ¿ Sep 29, 2014 16:57 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 24, 2024 16:56 |
|
Magnus Gallant posted:It was definitely a joke. I originally planned to just vote along with mmm and see how long it took him to realize that the person he was casing was dead/check reactions other people had but then I decided that was dumb and people would immediately point out punt was dead. So I just quoted the death post to make it obvious to mmm I was loving with him. I've done it before. Cased someone who I killed I mean. And then mea culpa'd.
|
# ¿ Sep 29, 2014 20:11 |