|
I'm still mad at my friends from college who talked me into reading these. After I started, they told me that the first three were great but then it went downhill for a bit but the latest one was great again! And I'm sitting there going, the first three were awful slogs and they're the good part? Looking back, I'm not sure I had great friends in college.
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2014 15:48 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 06:29 |
|
PeterWeller posted:Haha. I wonder if the other guy had made that association, would he have got the satire? I saw it coming and I still couldn't believe it when I read it.
|
# ¿ Oct 5, 2014 23:34 |
|
Gazetteer posted:300 hours, and it's all downhill from here. I think we started at the bottom of the hill and have begun tunneling into to it.
|
# ¿ Oct 7, 2014 02:22 |
|
Night10194 posted:What is it about Objectivists that makes them write these giant loving tomes whenever they write? Do they think it makes them look smarter? Yes.
|
# ¿ Oct 7, 2014 02:26 |
|
Goodkind's head is so far up his own rear end he can see daylight again.
|
# ¿ Oct 7, 2014 02:59 |
|
Ixjuvin posted:Look, if we talk about all of the dumb things right off the bat then what's the point of having this poor idiot slog through this refuse pile chapter by chapter? Let's be honest - even now we've barely begun to scrape the surface of that pit mine of idiocy. There's plenty left for the poor bastard to unearth.
|
# ¿ Oct 7, 2014 05:29 |
|
Strong Mouse posted:I have this problem with a lot of forms of media. Not talking about something is a great way to add drama, but when it starts being the only way you know to create drama and you use it every time, you are a bad writer. It works if the character withholding information has a motivation for doing so. Otherwise, it's just laziness. Edit: For example, I just re-read Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy. Almost all of the drama in that book arises directly from the characters withholding critical information from each other, but the tension is believable and effective because everyone has a reason to do so. They're all navigating a maze of conflicting loyalties, and if you guess wrong about someone else, the stakes are literally life and death. That's good drama and good writing. Comrade Gorbash fucked around with this message at 02:30 on Nov 11, 2014 |
# ¿ Nov 11, 2014 02:22 |
|
Spoilers Below posted:Touché. I love that story. Even for bloated fantasy doorstoppers, this series doesn't do too well. Two hundred pages into Game of Thrones, Ned is already King's Landing and Daenerys has wed Drogo, and this is a series with a half-dozen different plot threads going at once AND what amounts to an intro short story that took 20 pages before we even meet anyone who's actually important. Wheel of Time is pretty slow moving itself, but two hundred pages into Eye of the World, Rand et al have fled their home village and are about to end up in Shadar Logoth.
|
# ¿ Dec 11, 2014 22:54 |
|
neongrey posted:It's got issues. It's got a lot of issues. If you're not sure it's worth picking it up, don't bother, but if you think you'd like it you probably will. The first novel is sort of self-contained, the way the pilot episode of a TV show is. Which means that if you read that and stop, you won't feel like you've completely wasted your time. And you'll know if you should stop, because the first book book is the whole series in microcosm - pretty well everything that's bad will continue to be bad for the rest of the series, and everything that's good will be the good bits going forward. By the end of Eye of the World you'll know if you want any more of what Jordan offers.
|
# ¿ Dec 12, 2014 07:41 |
|
Spoilers Below posted:His one downside is that his fight scenes read like someone who's never been in a fight before, and is only describing what he's seen on TV, as opposed to Vietnam veteran Robert Jordan, or WWI Veteran JRR Tolkien, or even fencer Michael Moorcock, but he's hardly the only fantasy writer that accusation could be laid on *cough Goodkind cough*, and really, it only stands out when in direct comparison, as he's literally finishing another person's work. Sanderson's own monstrous fantasy doorstopper series - Stormlight Chronicles - is worth checking out if you're already in the market for that kind of thing. There's some really interesting world building going on there, though there's a shared universe thing going on with his other works I don't personally care for.
|
# ¿ Dec 12, 2014 23:31 |
|
Sindai posted:I don't think so. We just know it's super huge compared to the setting of the books and yet somehow all the fate-of-the-world stuff is concentrated in this little shithole corner. A fantasy world only Rudyard Kipling could love.
|
# ¿ Dec 13, 2014 03:21 |
|
DARKSEID DICK PICS posted:You pretty much just hope he won't rape you as much if he wins. Once again, an idea that actually has some legs when put in the hands of a semi-competent author. Charles Stross' Laundry series has this is a major motivation for some of the cultists who worship various Elder Things. Given that it's a Lovecraftian universe, even the good guys often suspect the best they can hope for is going down fighting. Cutting a deal with the devil makes almost makes sense under those conditions, and is a constant reason for security concerns. It's very appropriate for a horror-espionage series. I remember it coming up in Wheel of Time as well and being handled better there too (though Jordan seemed to prefer the "seduced by promises of power" trope). Basically in both cases the main characters spend a lot more time actually worrying about and looking for fifth columnists, plus other characters actually have their own secret agendas they're pursuing that aren't directly part of the good vs evil dynamic, leading to lots of red herrings. So when darkfriends do pop up it feels less like an asspull. It's still a get-out-of-jail card, but other writers at a minimum go back and try to justify it before the reveal.
|
# ¿ Dec 15, 2014 11:36 |
|
alarumklok posted:Okay so we've narrowed it down to not about slutty Clintons, not about another of Dick Rahl's relatives, and not about racquetball. Anyone have any ideas what this book is actually about? I remember that this was the last book in the series I read. The "friends" who recommended it to me said the first three or four were great, then it got kind of bad for a bit, but the new book - Chainfire, book flipping 9 - was good again! After reading the first three, the idea that it got worse from here immediately cut off any interest I had in reading more. But I honestly don't remember anything about the plot other than Cara being one of the two or three good characters who deserved a better series (I may be in the minority, but I don't like Zedd) and the Emperor first showing up. My recollection was that Stone of Tears was actually the third book, in fact. I cannot think of anything else I've read since getting out of highschool that has left less of an impression on me. Certainly nothing else that's this goddamn long.
|
# ¿ Jan 9, 2015 06:18 |
|
I know it's been repeated a dozen times now, but the fact that literally no one can remember what the gently caress happens in this book is probably the true magic of the whole series.
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2015 05:15 |
|
DARKSEID DICK PICS posted:I want to just point out: she was taught enough High D'Haran to instantly pick out violated, but could not decipher a number. Doesn't surprise me at all that a language favored by wizards in this setting a) uses "violated" often enough for it to be one of the first words you'd learn and b) is hosed up enough that it's numbers and its ordinals don't share the same roots. Or has more than one set of ordinals! (Just like English ) Comrade Gorbash fucked around with this message at 18:40 on Feb 13, 2015 |
# ¿ Feb 13, 2015 14:51 |
|
Hyper Crab Tank posted:Yet another thing Goodkind lifted straight from Wheel of Time, then. Not really - in most cases in WoT there's at least a reason why information isn't getting shared (spies for various factions all over the place, mixed loyalties, conflicting goals. and a semi-reasonable understanding of distances and travel times), and in most cases it doesn't have the same judgmental tone about it. Not sharing information causes a lot of the problems and drama in the series, but there's at least motivation for it. That it happens so often is poor storytelling as well, don't get me wrong, but it's a different sort of problem. In this series, characters routinely fail to share information or explain themselves when there's literally no reason not to. And it's pretty much a constant that if someone does something dumb because information wasn't shared, then the person withholding the information will be super pissed at the other. Goodkind seems to think is justified behavior, instead of completely asinine. It's more that, once again, Goodkind steals an idea that he doesn't actually understand and manages to gently caress it up. Comrade Gorbash fucked around with this message at 23:58 on Feb 13, 2015 |
# ¿ Feb 13, 2015 23:55 |
|
Honestly, if all Subtractive vs Additive magic boiled down to was a difference in the approach of the wizard, that would actually have been interesting. A lot of power in the story already hinges on personal belief and perception; having the personal worldview of the wizard drive how their magic functions would not only fit the world, it would be a unique take. But its Goodkind so it goes without saying that he squanders the opportunity.
|
# ¿ Jun 27, 2016 02:32 |
|
Kaza42 posted:"No, don't you see that's the Stone of Tear, his book is the Stone of TearS completely different and he isn't just ripping off the wheel of time. Also his books are way better and not terrible" -Terry Goodkind It's a patently hilarious claim, made all the more asinine given how derivative fantasy is in general. There's a pretty long history of authors going "I read <other author> and decided, I want to do that but with x instead of y" and everyone being pretty much okay with it.
|
# ¿ Jul 11, 2016 16:50 |
|
Kaza42 posted:Isn't that also about where magic starts being referred to as "weaves" and there's a reclusive yet politically important enclave of female magic users with extended lifespans who are ruled by a single powerful matron and there's also evil pale men in magic black cloaks stronger than nearly any single warrior? Yep. I remember bringing this up to the people who introduced me to the series, and the amount of bending over backwards they did to claim it wasn't ripping off WoT was nearly as hilarious as it was infuriating.
|
# ¿ Jul 11, 2016 20:05 |
|
Paragon8 posted:Basically its all super dumb and lovely. swordoftruth.txt
|
# ¿ Jul 11, 2016 23:38 |
|
malkav11 posted:Frankly, if Sword of Truth were a direct ripoff of Wheel of Time instead of just cribbing a few bits here and there it would be a much better series.
|
# ¿ Jul 12, 2016 01:40 |
|
the_steve posted:This served to remind me that I still like Dalton as a villain. But yeah, in this case its mostly because Goodkind is a terrible writer.
|
# ¿ Jul 21, 2016 18:19 |
|
dscruffy1 posted:I thought Confessor was the last book he wrote. So of course he went back to SoT with a quickness.
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2016 08:55 |
|
there wolf posted:Limited tools being an incomplete understanding of magic and it's workings. Richard could be the fool who knows nothing but isn't limited by what's possible as a result. Instead he learns magic via infordumps and osmosis which is all a million times more boring than seeing some fuckups follow by spectacular success when it really counts. Except, unlike with Dick's perfect solution rear end pulls, Allison's solutions typically lead to more problems later, and the balance is better. Dick is always right and conventional wisdom is always wrong. Allison is often right and conventional wisdom often flawed... but not always, and often BOTH are partly correct and partly wrong. That kind of complexity is needed to make it work, or it just becomes... well, it becomes the black and white authorial sermonizing Sword of Truth is.
|
# ¿ Apr 14, 2017 06:22 |
|
I'm a little late on the fantasy worlds with reasonable logistics, but Django Wexler's Shadow Campaigns have a lot of reasonable Napoleonic warfare going on. It's also actually fun to read, for a bonus. Edit: The Mongols used to pull that "kill thousands of helpless people in an afternoon" stuff but there was a whole system to it, with quotas. The Mongols were pretty loving scary. Comrade Gorbash fucked around with this message at 03:57 on Aug 7, 2017 |
# ¿ Aug 7, 2017 03:53 |
|
gschmidl posted:Just HAD to have more than Jordan.
|
# ¿ Oct 10, 2017 19:53 |
|
Nihilarian posted:Plus I think we already speculated about Verin->Verna at some point anyway.
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2017 06:25 |
|
PJOmega posted:Ah yes, Mike Rowe. He jumps in and does a "dirty job" for maybe five hours under heavy supervision all while getting paid ten to hundreds of times what any worker is paid. He then extolls to the camera how wonderfully rewarding it is, all while ignoring that these workers are going to spend 30-40 years doing that job. For a sliver of what he was paid. Without the supervision and safety.
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2017 16:50 |
|
Deceitful Penguin posted:The Wheel of time was extremely my poo poo because the fucker clearly wanted to write exactly what he wanted and at some point must have threatened his publishers and editors with something sharp to get that many words.
|
# ¿ Oct 19, 2017 03:37 |
|
The lardo detour reads like Terry hadn't heard of the stuff before, tried it, loved it, and decided EVERYONE MUST KNOW OF THIS, THIS IS AMAZING. Except everyone did know, he's just an oblivious idiot. He's exactly the kind of self-centered to think that because something is to new to him, it's new to everyone else.
|
# ¿ Dec 6, 2017 16:10 |
|
The remake actually had China as the invader, until a real distributor came on board, laughed at the producers, and order them to CGI and dub over everything because there was no way in hell anyone was releasing a movie that was going to be unsellable to a billion person market.
|
# ¿ Mar 26, 2018 06:40 |
|
gschmidl posted:....oh yeah. Almost like Goodkind is an awful, unedited
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2018 21:56 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 06:29 |
|
It's also worth noting that David is loving gigantic. It's 17 feet tall and weighs around six tons (it's never been formally weighed but that's the rough estimate). Even if the design and pose were as simple as they first appear, just working at that scale is astonishing.
|
# ¿ Apr 13, 2018 21:13 |