|
What kind of a name is Chiles? You can have Charles or Giles, idiot parents
|
# ¿ Oct 10, 2014 21:51 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 18, 2024 00:03 |
|
The Big Taff Man posted:Stevens a oval office. Dont like him Good call Taff
|
# ¿ Oct 14, 2014 23:17 |
|
"Privacy Is History" gently caress me. I can't remember the last time I heard something so stupid come out of an ostensibly intelligent person's mouth. Kill him
|
# ¿ Oct 16, 2014 00:34 |
|
OhYeah posted:4. #London. gently caress off.
|
# ¿ Oct 20, 2014 18:55 |
|
#Putting a hashtag in front of ANYTHING makes it stupid and moronic.
|
# ¿ Oct 20, 2014 19:45 |
|
Apparently that bloke is a VICIOUS THUG as well. I don't know the details I just saw a headline on the paper when I was in the shops.
|
# ¿ Oct 21, 2014 12:55 |
|
If only that lanky oval office was still here to help them with luxury trading
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2014 21:07 |
|
I don't think "I like my house to smell nice" is a good reason for someone to be project manager
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2014 21:10 |
|
Professor Grumpy posted:Ignoring market research, cross it off your bingo card No, no they didn't! They're definitely not taking a stab in the dark, they definitely know what they're doing
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2014 21:13 |
|
You heard it, biggest margin = biggest profit, it's dead simple like. Forget the fact that people actually have to buy the things at absurdly high prices
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2014 21:16 |
|
So basically sell them for anything between £10 and £40 guys
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2014 21:23 |
|
Getting told off by Karren yesssss
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2014 21:24 |
|
Nettle Soup posted:Why... Why not sell the 2? They just gave them away for free to the next guy who was already going to do a deal with them, quality planning
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2014 21:36 |
|
I'm going to be annoyed that the poo poo team are probably going to win just by absurdly overpricing their lovely candles
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2014 21:41 |
|
How can Sugar say "they had more stuff left so it was more than £14 because in the real world they would have carried on"? What a loving idiot, the whole point is to get the most profit in the time given, by whichever means. If the other team had won by £14 he'd be saying why didn't you just sell them a bit cheaper. What a prick!
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2014 21:46 |
|
She's literally pathetic
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2014 21:48 |
|
Dr Scoofles posted:Aw, that was kind of sad Just makes me think she didn't belong in there with those cunts, anyone else would be bullshitting to high heaven and begging to stay in
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2014 21:51 |
|
The Big Taff Man posted:The other team got more profit tho and worked at a better margin I meant if the winning team had lost by £14 Sugar would have hounded them for having loads left over because they were too expensive. I just don't see how he can say that them having stock left over is a plus for them, according to the rules of the task all that stock is waste
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2014 21:52 |
|
Stephen's pitch is the weirdest thing I've ever seen
|
# ¿ Oct 29, 2014 22:31 |
|
hahaha she is an idiot
|
# ¿ Oct 29, 2014 22:31 |
|
Where did that girl in the red dress come from? She looks nice and I find her attractive
|
# ¿ Oct 29, 2014 22:40 |
|
"It can't have been that offensive, it got 3000 views" lmao
|
# ¿ Oct 29, 2014 22:43 |
|
This is awful
|
# ¿ Oct 29, 2014 22:53 |
|
If Pamela doesn't beat James I will cry
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2014 22:09 |
|
Wasn't she just describing Pictionary?
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2014 22:10 |
|
They would have to make a sci-fi or fantasy board game to please those goons, which they're obviously never going to do
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2014 22:13 |
|
These questions are loving poo poo
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2014 22:15 |
|
Pamela is rubbish, I am disappointed. James is probably going to win this
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2014 22:17 |
|
Why the hell are they letting that idiot write all these lovely questions? Can't they hear what drivel he's coming up with
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2014 22:19 |
|
I would be embarrassed to be associated with this relationship game
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2014 22:21 |
|
Daniel you snakey oval office. Writing a load of unbelievably poo poo questions and then saying he didn't even like them and didn't want to do it! What cheek
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2014 22:24 |
|
"The most I can go to is £10" "Can you go to any more?" ...
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2014 22:25 |
|
I won't be surprised if the dating game doesn't get any sales
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2014 22:26 |
|
Cunning Plan posted:That aussie guy is bloody good. Some of his pitch was a bit errr but it did work and he's generally very consistent and not stupid
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2014 22:29 |
|
Dr Scoofles posted:Did she say Westminister? Twice That's two weeks in a row Bianca has hosed her team over for no reason
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2014 22:32 |
|
Robnoxious posted:So some dumpy shop on Front Street with 6 game boxes ruined a huge corporate deal? That might be the axe for Bianca. Lucky for her I can't see the other team winning this, otherwise she'd be out the door no question
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2014 22:37 |
|
A kickabout with Seaman lmao on your head Seaman!
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2014 22:42 |
|
Devol_Tettran posted:Can't see Pamela as PM walking away from this.
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2014 22:44 |
|
Leave Mark alone from the edit we get it looks like he basically PMed the last two tasks after the actual PMs utterly failed
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2014 22:49 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 18, 2024 00:03 |
|
Junior G-man posted:He did just write the most offensive questions for that awful loving boardgame though. He did, and he seemed to think they were good at the time, but the fact that Pamela let it happen is inexcusable
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2014 22:56 |