|
somnambulist posted:Spoilers- Its both.
|
# ¿ Dec 16, 2014 05:51 |
|
|
# ¿ Mar 28, 2024 10:30 |
|
MisterBibs posted:The issue, ultimately, is that symbolism can't support things on its own; it works best as subtext. You can never get rid of it. Might as well try to make sure it doesn't become malevolent again.
|
# ¿ Nov 7, 2015 22:02 |
|
MisterBibs posted:Or, since it retreated into the closet, let it starve there. You don't feed a entity thing that is tormenting you, especially won you just defeated. I don't think the being you explicitly can never ever get rid off isn't going to starve if you don't give it food.
|
# ¿ Dec 9, 2015 22:14 |
|
MisterBibs posted:Then why feed it at all? Don't tell me the ~symbolism~ of it. The symbolism of it isn't going to absolve or replace the practical insanity of it. If you wanna be practical evil book monsters donīt actually exist which means the whole film is bad. FreudianSlippers fucked around with this message at 01:34 on Dec 11, 2015 |
# ¿ Dec 11, 2015 01:31 |