|
Only if I get to be Culling of the Cows aligned.
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2014 03:59 |
|
|
# ¿ Mar 28, 2024 15:24 |
|
P.S. for anyone who doesn't know, I'm JJ.
|
# ¿ Nov 13, 2014 00:19 |
|
I have digested my role. It was delicious!
|
# ¿ Nov 13, 2014 09:03 |
|
By the way, who else is a Miller?
|
# ¿ Nov 13, 2014 09:04 |
|
Wizards have had many battles against monsters. Monsters tend to try and steal wizard's magic, as it would allow the monsters to become magical monsters. The most tremendous battle in monster versus wizard history has been Y'lthalrn the Mighty against Killroy. Scholars still debate which one was the monster. Regardless, monsters protect the earth sometimes, under magical supervision. PAGE 10 OF 681
|
# ¿ Nov 13, 2014 09:16 |
|
EccoRaven posted:Ok jokevoting is now over. Ooh pick me pick me!
|
# ¿ Nov 13, 2014 20:32 |
|
Meinberg posted:I agree with vigging Met. I would like Meinberg to be vigged, please.
|
# ¿ Nov 14, 2014 01:30 |
|
Dr. Hurt posted:He came out of "retirement" for this. All the more reason to vig him.
|
# ¿ Nov 14, 2014 01:32 |
|
Opopanax posted:Also I'm changing my PM and I'm Le Beaver now
|
# ¿ Nov 14, 2014 06:56 |
|
Tremendous Taste posted:That was a stupid loving vig This never would have happened on 2+2!!!
|
# ¿ Nov 14, 2014 19:39 |
|
Somberbrero posted:As always, I speak for Terrordon. Terrordon has given all loyal subjects the weekend off in celebration of His imminent victory over all monsters. The disloyal subjects shall envy the dead. Hey, I am very aware of this game existing! What game are we playing, again?
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2014 01:12 |
|
##volunteer
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2014 19:37 |
|
"If one of the volunteers is smashed/puppy cuddled the next person to volunteer after the flip will take their place."
|
# ¿ Nov 16, 2014 16:39 |
|
Opopanax posted:##vote punt Ok even I got that. The rules are clearly laid out on this same page. You are playing ignorant to make yourself look towny. ##vote Opop that's pretty forced
|
# ¿ Nov 16, 2014 16:53 |
|
Okay, but try this case: Opop is scum.
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2014 03:36 |
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:I am literally blown away* Okay, how about this: Opop is 100% scum!
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2014 03:45 |
|
Lol
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2014 05:20 |
|
Wanna know that volcano result.
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2014 06:10 |
|
Okay so there is no reason to lynch anyone but a volcano-goer today. Lemme read all of them.
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2014 06:12 |
|
Oh wait, Ernie was third party and on the vote. Hrm.
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2014 06:13 |
|
I don't think Ernie would have failed it though, because he was a survivor?
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2014 06:14 |
|
Okay, I think we're having a disconnect in language here. I say "Opop is 100% scum", you hear "Jon Joe has no reason to believe Opop is not scum.", I meant "I think Opop is scum also I wanted to make a joke". The context of the statement was, I said Opop is scum. fiery_valkiery said "I am literally blown away* *not really", so I doubled down on the direction of the joke and said Opop is 100% scum. Did I think Opop was scummy for his post? Yes. Do I actually have any information to prove to myself, much less any of you, that any player in this game is for sure, without a doubt, scum? No, and it's really weird to me any of you think I was serious. Furthermore, when the day opened and I saw the sabotage, I said what I said about only lynching a volcano goer because it was a conclusion I arrived at prior ever seeing the results; if there was a sabotage, we should lynch a member to find them. Then I realized, hey, we have a dead confirmed third party on that vote, suddenly my idea is crap. It may be crap for other reasons, too, but that was the conclusion I came to. After reading the discussion surrounding it, I am of the camp that no special notice should be paid attention as to whether someone was or wasn't on the vote. Anyone who thinks Ecco is suspicious for using MATHS to debate my point, isn't getting the point I think. Ecco's state was a simple "IF TRUE THEN FOLLOWS" statement, which was correct, but WAS NOT supporting or in any way suggesting excluding volcano-goers from the vote. Any questions?
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2014 19:54 |
|
Somberbrero posted:This entire paragraph is completely unrelated to the game. It is a distraction and it is scummy. I firmly disagree with this statement; ecco's putting his thoughts about a lot of things in a single post. Just because one of those things isn't directly related to "WHO IS SCUM IN THIS GAME?!" doesn't make it scummy.
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2014 20:13 |
|
EccoRaven posted:The case against you is that you ended yesterday seeming really, really, really certain that Opop was probably scum. Sure, maybe you didn't notice the sabotage, and when you did you paused, but you rightly conclude a second later "ernie probably wouldn't sabotage it" (this is an assumption everyone is assuming but it's worth reminding people it's an assumption). So why didn't you immediately turn on Opop? Yeah I didn't immediately notice Opop was on the vote and also it's nice to rethink things anyway.
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2014 20:57 |
|
|
# ¿ Mar 28, 2024 15:24 |
|
EccoRaven posted:Cool well why have your thoughts on Opop changed? They haven't because I haven't rethought things yet. I am still mentally in day 1, essentially, plus three corpses and time spent defending myself and thinking Sombererorchereomario is wrong.
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2014 21:40 |