|
I'll reluctantly play.
|
# ¿ Nov 13, 2014 05:18 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 15:48 |
|
Vig Met. Last time he was scum he lurked and poo poo on people. Last time he was town he lurked and poo poo on people.
|
# ¿ Nov 14, 2014 04:00 |
|
I'm talking about this game where Met lurked the entire time and then launched personal attacks against winvirus and me when we tried to get him to play. You could arguably excuse his play because he was scum, but then he double downed on it in end game by attacking us again for calling him on it. ninja: read the whole page, not just the post I linked.
|
# ¿ Nov 14, 2014 15:05 |
|
Ixtlilton posted:I have heard Ernie say before that he only claims SK when he's not town. But then I read some more and he claimed it before he got his role pm. Why would you shoot Somberbrero? He's just chilling. Also, Monathin is town, thank me later. You could vig Met I don't remember him all that well has he posted? Apparently he used an incorrect gender pronoun and then was a dick about it. I'm also going to a hockey game tomorrow with some people and maybe it'll be okay but I'm worried our team sucks this year because all of Michigan's teams suck this year. We'll see. Ixtlilton posted:In my brief skim of Met's play in a Star Trek game he didn't seem that hard to read or as bad as you guys are saying. Can I get linked to objectionable material? These posts serve no purpose but try to look like they're helpful.
|
# ¿ Nov 14, 2014 15:06 |
|
EccoRaven posted:Removing worthless, obnoxious, or toxic players is the job of vigilantes (and good-hearted scum), not the town. Which is why my comments were appropriate in the vigilante discussion. What do you think of Ixt?
|
# ¿ Nov 14, 2014 16:30 |
|
I kind of want to act scummy so the scum team thinks I'm scum and avoids nightkilling me.
|
# ¿ Nov 14, 2014 18:40 |
|
Meinberg posted:Well, Ecco has failed us. It's time for Meinberg to shine. Meinberg for President 2016
|
# ¿ Nov 14, 2014 18:40 |
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:I don't think Ernie's mindset is a town mindset. I completely don't agree with his argument that town should try to look a little scummy. I think he is approaching the game from a mindset of how, as scum, does he identify his buddies. I generally disfavor arguments that are based on disagreements over general mafia theory. I also disagree with Ernie, but I don't think he's scum for trying to advance that strategy. A better argument for Ernie being scum would be what Ecco said on the last page. What do you think about that argument?
|
# ¿ Nov 14, 2014 23:03 |
|
Unless you're calling someone scum because of the preexisting discussion of the Ernie strat, let's stop talking about the Ernie strat.
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2014 16:54 |
|
Vote Ixt.
|
# ¿ Nov 16, 2014 17:19 |
|
Puntification posted:Have you stopped to consider you should feel bad for being terrible? Probably not Opo.
|
# ¿ Nov 16, 2014 18:12 |
|
Ernie. posted:up next: merk, he's playing at a safe distance. one page before my theory of everything this game should be, merk himself agreed that everyone needs to act a little scummy I don't think you're scummy for advancing the game theory. The only post I found that is semi persuasive for why you might be scum is this post: EccoRaven posted:"I just want us to remember that there probably aren't watchers or trackers!"
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2014 01:38 |
|
merk posted:I generally disfavor arguments that are based on disagreements over general mafia theory. I also disagree with Ernie, but I don't think he's scum for trying to advance that strategy. A better argument for Ernie being scum would be what Ecco said on the last page. What do you think about that argument? I even mention what I said in my last post here.
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2014 01:41 |
|
Ernie. posted:just because ecco appended 'doesn't help us find scum' to a bunch of my words This is a ridiculous post, friend.
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2014 01:43 |
|
Ernie. posted:more to the point I think Ecco is scummy if he thinks the case on you, built solely from that game theory stuff, is the strongest case of the day.
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2014 02:19 |
|
EccoRaven posted:I think Ernie wants us to deliberately play sub-optimally ("scummy") because he's genuinely afraid he won't be able to post townie this game, so if he gets even a few townies to follow him he'll get to hide better. To be more clear, this post is a "pretty scummy post" as far as scummy posts go. I find it hard to believe that Ecco legitimately believes this ridiculous argument.
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2014 02:20 |
|
The thing about Ecco is that there's no way you're going to get him lynched day 1, so you may as well forget about it until later. Ixt, however, is definitely a dude we can get lynched on day 1.
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2014 02:23 |
|
merk posted:The thing about Ecco is that there's no way you're going to get him lynched day 1, so you may as well forget about it until later. Ixt, however, is definitely a dude we can get lynched on day 1. Well, I guess in this game since the scum don't even know each other, the traditional stuff you kind of have to throw out the window. I don't really even know how we scum hunt in this game after today. I usually look for connections.
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2014 02:24 |
|
EccoRaven posted:("Playing like town" means posting often, not hiding their thoughts, and being sincere in their scumhunting. It's harder than a normal game because of the lack of connections, but if town actually rolls up their sleeves and tries, it really won't be that bad.) If I was scum this game, I'd probably get nightkilled by the scum.
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2014 02:58 |
|
Dr. Hurt posted:I dunno why you'd jynx it but I know you could always "jinx" it. It seems so petty for me to say that a two vote (edit: now one vote) lead when it's a 4 v. 2 scenario is this make him the easiest to vote off. Technically yes but we are still a long long way to go. Dr. Hurt posted:Thank god you are here telling us what is good and what is not good. We would be lost like babes in the wood if you weren't here telling us when something is a good thing or a bad thing. Tell us more, oh great Ecco. Dr. Hurt posted:You are just mafiadadding pretty hard and are pretty condescending in the process and I am not a fan of it. What are you doing? Who would switch to Hurt? This poo poo is unhelpful.
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2014 03:00 |
|
Yeah.... ##vote Dr. Hurt
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2014 03:01 |
|
Dr. Hurt posted:This is the only thing pinging my scumdar right now about Ixt's posts. I guarantee to you that Dr. Hurt is scum based on this sentence.
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2014 03:48 |
|
I've been convinced of myself before, but this might be the most convinced I've been of myself on a day 1 case in many a month.
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2014 03:48 |
|
merk posted:I guarantee to you that Dr. Hurt is scum based on this sentence. For those that don't get it, the scum mind set here is (and I did this myself and recently took it out of my game once I realized it): I really should look like I have something to say about the current majority lynch candidate. What can I say that is completely unhelpful but looks helpful? Combine that with him willingly diving into an argument with Ecco that does not do even the slightest poo poo towards finding us scum and you have yourself an amazing d1 case - a d1 case that you should vote behind.
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2014 03:50 |
|
I AM SO RIGHT HERE PLEASE PLEASE GOONS
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2014 03:51 |
|
Hurt is diving into this Ecco discussion and has not even voted anyone or explained to us who he thinks is scum. He is playing like a Survivor.
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2014 03:52 |
|
Man, I'll vote Ixt, but I am certain of Hurt.
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2014 04:31 |
|
##vote Ixt
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2014 05:38 |
|
Always bet on merk.
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2014 06:13 |
|
##vote Ecco
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2014 06:30 |
|
Opopanax posted:I don't like that JJ made a big show of humming and hawing over who might have sabotaged the mission when I was on the vote and he was 100% convinced I was scum yesterday. To not even mention me now and bend over backwards trying to blame Ernie or at least look conflicted about it is suspicious. Yeah, ##vote JJ See you day 3.
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2014 16:34 |
|
I think JJ is scum based on Opo's case. I found the serial killer on day 1. I'm in a game on another forum with 6000 posts.
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2014 16:57 |
|
I may light up when I see more stuff.
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2014 16:57 |
|
Somberbrero posted:Why is it not possible to use the challenge results to play mafia? Why are you choosing to frame the decision to scumhunt inside or outside of the challenge pool as a question of chance? This dude is another scum.
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2014 18:19 |
|
Ecco, how am I phoning it in when yesterday I caught the Serial Killer?
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2014 18:50 |
|
If I was scum, since I don't know my scum buddies, I'd be playing this game like a Survivor. I wouldn't give a poo poo who got lynched as long as it wasn't me, and I'd look drat persuasive not giving any of that poo poo when I made cases. I wasn't using the SK thing to throw in your face as a LAMIST (hate that acronym) but more of a 'how can you say I'm not trying when my efforts got us the SK?'
|
# ¿ Nov 20, 2014 04:19 |
|
wolfy
|
# ¿ Nov 20, 2014 04:20 |
|
We're scum hunting in the wrong way. We need to be looking for people who are trying to find their scum buddies while themselves faking content. Ecco's d1 case on Ernie is a really lovely case, which is why I kind of think he's scum.
|
# ¿ Nov 20, 2014 04:22 |
|
Like, yeah: ##vote Ecco
|
# ¿ Nov 20, 2014 04:27 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 15:48 |
|
merk posted:We're scum hunting in the wrong way. We need to be looking for people who are trying to find their scum buddies while themselves faking content. Ecco's d1 case on Ernie is a really lovely case, which is why I kind of think he's scum. To be clear, I don't think Ecco had any confidence whatsoever in his case. He found something that he could argue against from a general mafia principle, so he went down that road thinking it was likely that Ernie was not one of his buddies.
|
# ¿ Nov 20, 2014 04:37 |