|
Are you at all offended? How do you proceed?
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 17:21 |
|
|
# ? Apr 19, 2024 07:52 |
|
If you're making it gender non-specific, why does that involving disabling the urinals? Clearly it's to make a statement, but can't people use whichever they prefer.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 17:24 |
|
Volcott posted:Are you at all offended? How do you proceed?
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 17:25 |
|
I'd piss in the sink.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 17:25 |
|
why cant ladies use urinals? equality please.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 17:48 |
|
Why does it say that they're "offline"? Do they have wi-fi access? What for?
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 18:01 |
|
I know someone who took a poo poo in a urinal they're not really that gender specific. also there is the she-wee
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 18:04 |
|
Popular Thug Drink posted:I'd piss in the sink. also lol if you've never done this when there is a queue of guys at a club or party or whatever and you're busting and drunk / high and just skip everyone and whip it out and piss in the sink and then everyone else after you decides to do that. gently caress yeah.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 18:06 |
|
Probably more annoyed since half the time the shared bathroom stalls on campus were disgusting and as a previous poster mentioned everyone can pee standing up with the proper tools.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 18:07 |
|
I would shout "owned," fist-pump, and then write about it on my anti-SJW Tumblr page.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 18:08 |
|
Is it some kind of art exhibit
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 18:08 |
|
I wonder why the actual gender nonspecific bathroom in my building is out of order and use the toilet like a goddamn civilized human being.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 18:09 |
|
If the bathroom is supposed to gender neutral why make it less convient for men to use it? After all neutral does not mean female-only. I would have peed on the plastic covering if i was there alone.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 18:17 |
Making things better for non-men always making it worse for men.
|
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 18:18 |
|
Baudolino posted:If the bathroom is supposed to gender neutral why make it less convient for men to use it? After all neutral does not mean female-only. Serious guess? Someone was concerned that a woman might walk in on a guy using a urinal and see something they shouldn't.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 18:23 |
|
What about the victims of the person who takes the middle urinal with 3 urinals? Or the poor sods who get stuck next to a guy who tries to talk to them while they pee? Won't someone think of the suffering from the bathroom etiquette oppressors?
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 18:24 |
|
Volcott posted:
When people make fun of college liberals: This is what they mean.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 18:27 |
|
I think its stupid because the restroom itself is gender specific.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 18:28 |
|
Volcott posted:Are you at all offended? How do you proceed? Jokes on you I piss exclusively in empty Gatorade bottles now. Think about how much water that saves, even more than a urinal.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 18:32 |
|
I would want more information - has it been made unisex because the women's bathroom on that floor is unavailable for the day due to maintenance? If so, OK, whatever, these things happen. If it's some dumb gender issues awareness stunt, I would be quietly annoyed for a bit and lower my opinion of the idiot responsible.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 18:33 |
|
Doctor Butts posted:I think its stupid because the restroom itself is gender specific. Agreed. Personally I'm completely in favor of making gender-neutral bathrooms the norm (particularly when it comes to single user bathrooms), but this kind of militant advocacy doesn't make any sense. It raises the topic, sure, but it just alienates anyone that might support you. Walking into women's restrooms and removing all the mirrors doesn't strike a blow for gender equality - it just pisses people off. Kaal fucked around with this message at 18:35 on Nov 12, 2014 |
# ? Nov 12, 2014 18:33 |
|
gender neutral bathrooms should have a urinal anyway cause you don't want ppl with male genitals urinating on the thing other people sit on
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 18:35 |
|
JFairfax posted:I know someone who took a poo poo in a urinal they're not really that gender specific. shoulda been a sheenis
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 18:43 |
|
id tear the bag the gently caress down, no one getting between me and a urinal, jfc
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 18:43 |
|
just move the sign and tear a little hole to pee through then replace the sign so as to blaze a trail for other iconoclasts
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 18:46 |
|
Is it so unreasonable for toilets to be sex-specific (not gender-specific, because gender is stupid), though? I mean, the only argument against desegregated toilets that isn't bigoted or stupid comes from women who don't want to pee in the same room as men. It just so happens to be a pretty good argument. Is it actually that big a problem for women not to want a man and his penis in the bathroom stall next to them, given how many loving horrific things happen in bathrooms to women at the hands of men anyway? What is it with this small minority of (almost exclusively) young transwomen and overzealous allies who make this their pet issue and will make absolutely no concessions to the large number of women who would really rather not pee while sitting three feet away from a dude for quite obvious reasons?
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 18:59 |
|
If I walked into a bathroom and saw that, I would rip it all down, pee in the urinal, and flush it. Your right to express your disdain for contemporary norms around bathrooms, does not trump my right to pee without sitting down if I so choose.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 19:06 |
|
I'm gonna be honest, I expected this thread to go in an entirely different direction. I'm glad to see I'm not the odd man out, thinking this is unreasonable.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 19:11 |
|
im species-nonspecfic and i will smear my waste wherever i please, xir
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 19:11 |
|
It would be funny to see an angry anti-SJW tear off the cover and piss in the urinal only to discover they were unavailable due to a technical fault and their piss backs up and overflows onto their shoes haha
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 19:38 |
|
return0 posted:It would be funny to see an angry anti-SJW tear off the cover and piss in the urinal only to discover they were unavailable due to a technical fault and their piss backs up and overflows onto their shoes haha If the urinals were broken, the sign would probably say that rather than waffling on about the bathroom being "gender non-specific" (seriously, why not use the much less clunky "unisex" ?)
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 19:40 |
|
Volcott posted:
No.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 19:42 |
|
Volcott posted:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ia1KAi01IfQ
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 19:45 |
|
Volcott posted:I'm gonna be honest, I expected this thread to go in an entirely different direction. I'm glad to see I'm not the odd man out, thinking this is unreasonable. im glad your dumb thread blew up in your face
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 19:45 |
|
Volcott posted:
I take one down and proceed to piss. Isn't that the obvious solution?
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 19:46 |
|
And just why, exactly, aren't the signs language non-specific too? Seems oddly regionalist of them to leave out the esperanto. We deserve to not be discriminated against too, drat it!
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 19:46 |
|
Depends on how strict the local public urination laws are.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 19:50 |
|
I wouldn't be offended, but I do think it's dumb. And I might tear off the plastic and piss there anyhow if the stalls were occupied. All they've managed to do there is reduce the capacity of that particular restroom. You want to make it all non-binary, just rip the signs off and tell everyone to piss in whichever they want.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 19:59 |
|
LemonDrizzle posted:If the urinals were broken, the sign would probably say that rather than waffling on about the bathroom being "gender non-specific" (seriously, why not use the much less clunky "unisex" ?) To goad someone into pissing into your hosed toilet.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 20:07 |
|
|
# ? Apr 19, 2024 07:52 |
|
return0 posted:To goad someone into pissing into your hosed toilet.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2014 20:14 |