|
Whitey Ford posted:How fast is the modern safety car and at what point in history would it have out qualified all other cars on the grid? Genuinely interested. It's still an SLS AMG right? Obviously the SC is closer to the road-going version but the GT3 version qualified 3rd at Spa in 2:18.934, the F1 107% cutoff there this year was 2:16.029.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2015 14:45 |
|
|
# ? Apr 30, 2024 20:29 |
|
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/sport/formulaone/article4366593.ecequote:Lewis Hamilton is aiming to become the highest earner in Formula One history as talks on a possible £150 million three-year contract with his Mercedes team reach a critical phase.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2015 14:56 |
|
Xisticide posted:It's still an SLS AMG right? Obviously the SC is closer to the road-going version but the GT3 version qualified 3rd at Spa in 2:18.934, the F1 107% cutoff there this year was 2:16.029. If the F1 cut-off was 2:16.029 it was because it was wet. Normally a lap of Spa in an F1 car takes around 105-110 seconds. The last time we had a dry qualifying at Spa was 2012; 107% was 1:56.622. The first time F1 cars raced at the new Spa (in 1983), 2:18.934 would have put you just behind Salazar in last on the grid. This sounds almost respectable, so I'm going to point out that Salazar was 14 and a half seconds off pole and five seconds behind the next-to-last driver. Ilanin fucked around with this message at 15:00 on Feb 28, 2015 |
# ? Feb 28, 2015 14:57 |
|
Ilanin posted:If the F1 cut-off was 2:16.029 it was because it was wet. Normally a lap of Spa in an F1 car takes around 105-110 seconds. The last time we had a dry qualifying at Spa was 2012; 107% was 1:56.622. The first time F1 cars raced at the new Spa (in 1983), 2:18.934 would have put you just behind Salazar in last on the grid. This sounds almost respectable, so I'm going to point out that Salazar was 14 and a half seconds off pole and five seconds behind the next-to-last driver. Yeah I had a feeling it was probably wet but I couldn't be bothered to check vv
|
# ? Feb 28, 2015 15:08 |
|
Yeah I wouldn't be surprised the learn the road going version was quicker than no F1 ever.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2015 16:02 |
|
One problem is the circuit layouts changing over time. Spa is obviously out if you want to go really far back because it doesn't go through the woods anymore. For fun I compared the 1964 British Grand Prix at Brands Hatch with the 2011 British GT championship results, but I don't know how much that circuit has changed other than it seems shorter today based on math. Anyway, Jim Clark's qualifying lap in 1964 was 1:38:1, which is about 97mph over 2.65 miles. An SLS AMG GT3 did a 1:28.6 in 2011 with an average speed of 98.87mph which would work out to 2.42 miles. If you take Clark's average speed over the shorter distance, it'd be a 1:29:8. So yeah. Imperfect comparison, but it looks like the racing SLS isn't that much faster than a 1960s F1 car. http://f1pulse.com/racecard/British_Grand_Prix_1964/3B3C42/race_card_qualify.aspx http://www.britishgt.com/results.php?event=3&season=2011&session=Qualifying%201 e: wrong year BAD AT STUFF fucked around with this message at 19:16 on Feb 28, 2015 |
# ? Feb 28, 2015 16:53 |
|
McLaren with an oil leak, no more testing today.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2015 17:58 |
|
Mimetic posted:One problem is the circuit layouts changing over time. Spa is obviously out if you want to go really far back because it doesn't go through the woods anymore. On the other hand, it would probably win a championship because it wouldn't break down or blow up and every other race, and would be much easier not to spin off
|
# ? Feb 28, 2015 18:03 |
|
[quote="Mimetic" post="442140102"] One problem is the circuit layouts changing over time. Spa is obviously out if you want to go really far back because it doesn't go through the woods anymore. For fun I compared the 1964 British Grand Prix at Brands Hatch with the 2011 British GT championship results, but I don't know how much that circuit has changed other than it seems shorter today based on math. Anyway, Jim Clark's qualifying lap in 1964 was 1:38:1, which is about 97mph over 2.65 miles. An SLS AMG GT3 did a 1:28.6 in 2011 with an average speed of 98.87mph which would work out to 2.42 miles. If you take Clark's average speed over the shorter distance, it'd be a 1:29:8. So yeah. Imperfect comparison, but it looks like the racing SLS isn't that much faster than a 1960s F1 car. /quote] It's not changed much. Graham Hill is a little different, Dingle Dell is a little different. Broadly other than that the layout is very similar but of course, different conditions, different tarmac etc etc. And of course that's the racing SLS on much, MUCH better tyres than the F1 would have had access to.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2015 20:34 |
|
Sulman posted:Huh? She had a very good Indycar run with KV. I guess if you consider 13th out of 19 full time drivers in a pretty weak series talent wise good?
|
# ? Feb 28, 2015 22:18 |
|
Mimetic posted:One problem is the circuit layouts changing over time. Spa is obviously out if you want to go really far back because it doesn't go through the woods anymore. Awesome.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2015 23:55 |
|
Dudley posted:It's not changed much. Graham Hill is a little different, Dingle Dell is a little different. Broadly other than that the layout is very similar but of course, different conditions, different tarmac etc etc. It's also worth pointing out that in 1964 F1 cars were running on 1.5 litre engines (the V8 Climax in the case of Clark's Lotus 25), so they were pretty down on horsepower compared to the ones that immediately followed - pole in 1966 was four seconds faster than in 1964; and then in 1968 once the Cosworth DFV had made its debut it was ten seconds faster. e: (For reference, the SLS has a 6.2 litre engine)
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 00:08 |
|
Thanks to Felipe, I won't be able to sleep tonight. (Yes, he posted a screenshot of his own Instagram on his Twitter)
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 01:23 |
|
There's something so... "Weekend At Bernie's" about that picture. I even feel bad for thinking it, but I can't help it.
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 02:56 |
|
he's got... lifeless eyes, black eyes, like a doll's eyes
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 03:01 |
|
He looks better than Stephen Hawking
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 03:10 |
|
poopzilla posted:he's got... lifeless eyes, black eyes, like a doll's eyes
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 03:41 |
|
Uncle Jam posted:I guess if you consider 13th out of 19 full time drivers in a pretty weak series talent wise good? She beat Sato.
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 04:31 |
|
Ilanin posted:It's also worth pointing out that in 1964 F1 cars were running on 1.5 litre engines (the V8 Climax in the case of Clark's Lotus 25), so they were pretty down on horsepower compared to the ones that immediately followed - pole in 1966 was four seconds faster than in 1964; and then in 1968 once the Cosworth DFV had made its debut it was ten seconds faster. There's a pretty awesome video out there of Graham Hill taking the 49 out for the first time. He has what was for Graham Hill the equivalent of pants shits ("It's got some pluck"). Can you imagine coming out of a 25 (granted the Cov Climax was no slouch) and hoping into a C-DSV powered, monocoque chassis 49? Hill said it was like driving an exploding hand grenade. Probably required more pure driving skill to get the most out of that car than anything else in the history of F1, but an effective driver was rewarded with a car that would stand on it's head. What was it, 1980-82 that the C-DSV was finally retired by most teams?
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 05:40 |
|
CratSock posted:There's something so... "Weekend At Bernie's" about that picture. I even feel bad for thinking it, but I can't help it. Which lifeless half dead guy are you talking about in the picture?
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 06:04 |
|
This year's summer blockbuster! Two men, two accidents, one vision... when a special owner meets a special driver, magic is always bound to happen. Frank has a working brain, calculating and keen, left over from his days as a convicted killer - but a knackered body. Felipe took a spring to the face and has never been the same since - but he has legs that he can walk on. This unlikely pair, whose lives revolve around sitting in wheeled seats, make an unlikely pair. But with help from their old friend and dependable Northerner, Bobby S; and thread favourite and full-time woman Claire W, maybe, just maybe, they can make it... one last ride. This summer, watch out for "When Frankie Met Felipe": coming to a cinema near you simplefish fucked around with this message at 06:15 on Mar 1, 2015 |
# ? Mar 1, 2015 06:12 |
|
quote:Nico Rosberg tweets: "Ready for another marathon. preparing like a prize fighter..." lol.
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 09:53 |
|
did I miss anything the last 700 posts whilst my phone was busted?
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 10:07 |
|
Jon Von Anchovi posted:did I miss anything the last 700 posts whilst my phone was busted? RIP alonso
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 10:08 |
|
Looks like Felipe stole one of Frank's chromosomes
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 10:09 |
|
thread title forever
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 10:10 |
|
NtotheTC posted:
Only way Nico is going to beat Lewis is if he starts banging Nicole/Roscoe/both.
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 10:14 |
|
NtotheTC posted:
Wouldn't last an hour in the rough streets of Stevenage
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 10:17 |
|
Jon Von Anchovi posted:did I miss anything the last 700 posts whilst my phone was busted? Every F1 driver is a fraud
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 10:17 |
|
NtotheTC posted:
Down the road - not across the street, Nico.
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 10:22 |
|
I see McLaren are saving time by not even bothering to go out today
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 10:26 |
|
Ilanin posted:It's also worth pointing out that in 1964 F1 cars were running on 1.5 litre engines (the V8 Climax in the case of Clark's Lotus 25), so they were pretty down on horsepower compared to the ones that immediately followed - pole in 1966 was four seconds faster than in 1964; and then in 1968 once the Cosworth DFV had made its debut it was ten seconds faster. Yep. So putting it very solidly ahead of modern GT3, let alone a road based safety car. Also imagine how dull F1 would have been if Lotus had kept an exclusive on that engine.
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 10:43 |
|
You Am I posted:All British team owners have that look. He was talking about Massa.
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 10:59 |
|
Jon Von Anchovi posted:did I miss anything the last 700 posts whilst my phone was busted?
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 11:41 |
|
How many actually useful, racing speed laps have Mclaren done in testing? Like I know there was a couple of times they had 50 odd laps, but atleast half of them were in/out laps or way off the pace. Meanwhile Merc have been doing race-sims since the first test. The mileage disadvantage they are up against now (especially when its the only Honda team) is going to gently caress them so bad. Isn't it 4 engines this year?? By like Monaco they will be getting grid penalties!
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 12:11 |
|
AgentJotun posted:How many actually useful, racing speed laps have Mclaren done in testing? Like I know there was a couple of times they had 50 odd laps, but atleast half of them were in/out laps or way off the pace. Meanwhile Merc have been doing race-sims since the first test. The mileage disadvantage they are up against now (especially when its the only Honda team) is going to gently caress them so bad. Isn't it 4 engines this year?? By like Monaco they will be getting grid penalties! One can hope.
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 13:23 |
|
Sauber could be a mid-top pack runner for the first few races this year if this reliability holds up. As for McLaren, they've done 349 laps total in pre-season testing, of which about 30-40 are full pelt. Even Boullier says they won't be competitive until Europe.
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 13:29 |
|
So who's renewing the GP Predictor comp?
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 14:10 |
|
Diet Crack posted:So who's renewing the GP Predictor comp? I'm pretty sure you're not talking about mine but I'll post it again anyway.
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 14:13 |
|
|
# ? Apr 30, 2024 20:29 |
|
http://hasmaldonadocrashedtoday.com/
|
# ? Mar 1, 2015 14:41 |