|
oddium posted:Is the hybrid dinosaur really named Diablosaurus Rex because that owns Hermanos! Come, the devil has built himself a dinosaur!
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 05:49 |
|
|
# ? Mar 29, 2024 01:03 |
|
Vaall posted:Judging from the trailer it seems like this franchise is about to go full retard. A "genetically-hybrid-super-killer-dinosaur" and a squad of raptors apparently helping humans to hunt it down and kill it? Are you loving kidding me? No one's joking around here. Raptor squad is the poo poo.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 05:54 |
|
I hope they don't show the T-Rex in any of the trailers. I want to see it in the theater, and be seven again.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 06:27 |
|
I'm loving down for this. Yeah it might be dumb but it can't be worse than JP3 man. JP 3 was loving bullshit and just awful the whole way through. Also don't give a poo poo about the t.rex if he comes out and saves the day. Just want to see how the park is run for real for a bit and then new dino wrecking poo poo, and Chris Pratt and his raptor crew. So down.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 06:31 |
|
I hope they also go hogwild in bringing stuff back from the dead, I want an aquarium full of Cambrian organisms, I want a trilobite touch tank (mainly because it would make old research adviser/prof happy) and a greenhouse with Carboniferous Period insects. Have kids riding 10 ft long millipedes drat it!!!
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 06:48 |
|
Vaall posted:Judging from the trailer it seems like this franchise is about to go full retard. A "genetically-hybrid-super-killer-dinosaur" and a squad of raptors apparently helping humans to hunt it down and kill it? Are you loving kidding me? And why wouldn't you be able to train a raptor?
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 07:05 |
I'm excited. Loved the theme at the end, and the shot of Howard with the flare looked siiick. The logo being brushed metal with 90s-as-hell typography will never not be dumb though
|
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 07:11 |
|
Wandle Cax posted:And why wouldn't you be able to train a raptor? Because uh uh uh they're evil!!!
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 07:28 |
|
Darko posted:3, I don't know what the hell 3 is, and the pacing/buildup is as bad as good as the other two are. I loved Sam Neill in JP3 because Alan Grant wanted to be back on that island about as much as I wanted to stay in my theatre seat.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 07:51 |
|
The only issue with the CGI is that it looks a little rough. I have to assume it isn't final. Not worried about that. I just really hope those Chris Pratt lines play better in context. His performance just feels stiff and weird. He sounds like he might burst into tears when he says to evacuate the island.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 08:09 |
|
quote:Twenty-two years after the events of Jurassic Park, Isla Nublar now features a fully functioning dinosaur theme park, Jurassic World, as originally envisioned by John Hammond. This new park is owned by the Masrani Corporation. Owen (Chris Pratt), a member of Jurassic World's on-site staff, conducts behavioral research on the Velociraptors. After many years, Jurassic World's attendance rates begin to decline and a new attraction, created to re-spark visitor interest, gravely backfires. I'm sorry but I can't take this movie premise seriously... There is no way attendance would decline at a theme park of real dinosaurs. I would go there every year. Gonna have to pass on this one!
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 08:52 |
|
ApexAftermath posted:He sounds like he might burst into tears when he says to evacuate the island. To be fair, he is on an island where everything has gone to poo poo. With dinosaurs.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 08:58 |
|
God I hope they've used Muldoon's DNA in the making of the hybrid to explain its hunting skills. Get me to June NOW!!!
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 10:29 |
|
D-Pad posted:I am fairly certain the engineered dino reveal is that it has chameleon like abilities. The big bad in the second book was a dinosaur that had chameleon genes and was basically invisible if it didn't move (get it?) And I always wondered why that has never made it into one of the films as it seems such an obvious direction to go. The twist would be that the chameleon dinosaur was secretly in the background of every shot thus far.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 10:52 |
|
Mr. Flunchy posted:The twist would be that the chameleon dinosaur was secretly in the background of every shot thus far. This would be awesome, loving hell why hasn't any horror movie done this. Closest thing I can think of is Uzumaki which has hidden spirals all over the place.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 11:06 |
|
Vaall posted:Judging from the trailer it seems like this franchise is about to go full retard. A "genetically-hybrid-super-killer-dinosaur" and a squad of raptors apparently helping humans to hunt it down and kill it? Are you loving kidding me? Have you not seen any movies made in the last 5 years? Full retard is the new standard.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 11:41 |
|
Jerkface posted:I'm sorry but I can't take this movie premise seriously... There is no way attendance would decline at a theme park of real dinosaurs. I would go there every year. Gonna have to pass on this one! Several people have said this and I can't tell it they're being serious. That's such a weird reason to not see a movie. It's all about whether or not they make the plot believable within the framework of the world they set up. It is not inconceivable to me their their target demographic (rich people) have become used to the dinosaurs and attendance begins leveling off or declining. Throw in a few irresponsible executive/investor types desperate to increase profits. They visit the park and find out Wu and his scientists have the ability to essentially create a new dinosaur by splicing together genes of existing dinosaurs, and the leap to "let's create a new dinosaur to get people interested in the park again" isn't hard for me to believe.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 12:43 |
|
They could also play off the Seaworld angle where it came out maybe giant animals need more room to move around. If there's a public shift in opinion like that, it could start to tank your business, especially if your animals cost a huge amount to maintain.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 13:33 |
|
I hope Child Protagonist only got a ticket because it was Gennaro Memorial Coupon Day
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 13:40 |
|
I'm getting kind of tired of the "evil/reckless scientists wreak havoc with their creations" cliche. How about a drama about awesome scientists struggling to friggin' clone dinosaurs against all odds? Nope, we need a fourth movie where the dinosaurs break out and try to eat annoying kids. E: The giant aquatic beastie was pretty baller though. Mr.48 fucked around with this message at 14:37 on Nov 26, 2014 |
# ? Nov 26, 2014 14:32 |
|
Mr.48 posted:I'm getting kind of tired of the "evil/reckless scientists wreak havoc with their creations" cliche. How about a drama about awesome scientists struggling to friggin' clone dinosaurs against all odds? Nope, we need a fourth movie where the dinosaurs break out and try to eat annoying kids. How about a drama about you struggling to make a good post against all odds?
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 14:44 |
|
oddium posted:I hope Child Protagonist only got a ticket because it was Gennaro Memorial Coupon Day This has to happen.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 14:45 |
|
Mr.48 posted:I'm getting kind of tired of the "evil/reckless scientists wreak havoc with their creations" cliche. How about a drama about awesome scientists struggling to friggin' clone dinosaurs against all odds? Nope, we need a fourth movie where the dinosaurs break out and try to eat annoying kids. They made this movie already. It's a few minutes long and it's the Dino DNA thing in the first movie so we don't have to suffer through an hour and a half of dorks in lab coats pulling blood out if a mosquito's butthole
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 14:50 |
|
D-Pad posted:I am fairly certain the engineered dino reveal is that it has chameleon like abilities. The big bad in the second book was a dinosaur that had chameleon genes and was basically invisible if it didn't move (get it?) And I always wondered why that has never made it into one of the films as it seems such an obvious direction to go. It at least made it to Sega's The Lost World gun game that was out at arcades soon after the movie.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 15:01 |
|
Everything in this trailer just seemed tremendously uninspired to me, from the quality of the CGI to all I've come to know of the plot. Such a pointless series reboot, but at least it probably won't stop people from going to see it anyway and at a later point complaining about the lack of originality in Hollywood.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 15:02 |
|
Apparently the gate is an actual real physical object, yet it looks as otherworldy CG as the rest of the special effects?
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 15:14 |
Honest Thief posted:Apparently the gate is an actual real physical object, yet it looks as otherworldy CG as the rest of the special effects? Just because it's a physical object doesn't mean it isn't CG in that shot. The worst CGI is the dead shark, because they could've easily used a model for that and it has no weight to it at all. Also the Mosasaur is way too big, it just looks dumb.
|
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 15:21 |
|
Honest Thief posted:Apparently the gate is an actual real physical object, yet it looks as otherworldy CG as the rest of the special effects? In the film, the trailer shot is CGI because it's a trailer shot
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 15:24 |
|
PriorMarcus posted:Just because it's a physical object doesn't mean it isn't CG in that shot. It kinda seems like an 80ft sea monster that could leap out of the water and take out the first dozen rows of spectators over the barrier is pretty unsafe. Don't worry though, I'm sure it's a directorial masterstroke to demonstrate the inherent instabilities of any system that attempts to control engineered monsters for the entertainment of the well-to-do burgeosie consumer culture. And so on and so forth.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 15:32 |
|
exquisite tea posted:Everything in this trailer just seemed tremendously uninspired to me, from the quality of the CGI to all I've come to know of the plot. It's trailer CGI, they almost always suck in the first trailer since they're still working on post.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 15:45 |
|
exquisite tea posted:Everything in this trailer just seemed tremendously uninspired to me, from the quality of the CGI to all I've come to know of the plot. Such a pointless series reboot, but at least it probably won't stop people from going to see it anyway and at a later point complaining about the lack of originality in Hollywood. There are reasons why the CGI is so lackluster https://np.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/2ndx0r/the_full_jurassic_world_trailer/cmcs22y the tl;dr version. 1. Trailer shots are typically a rush with the SFX guys just getting a call from marketing to push X Y and Z shots out asap. 2. The original jurrassic park benefited in part of people not knowing whether what they were doing was possible or not. Nowadays CGI is taken for granted, meaning more ambitious shots (the original used tricks to hide the CGI, where a modern film will just go balls out) and kind of "gently caress it, CGI is magic" attitude towards how much effort and manhours good CGI actually takes.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 15:54 |
|
Then why even show those big effect shots at all if they're going to look like junk. Who watches this trailer with plasticene dinos apparently modeled in Unreal 3 and goes "aha yes, I am thoroughly excited for this movie now."
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 15:59 |
|
They're not trying to convince people to see a movie half a year from now, they're telling people it exists
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 16:01 |
|
Millions of advertising dollars spent, big Thanksgiving Day reveal just to let folks know hey, this lovely-looking movie exists. Keep it on your radar.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 16:05 |
|
achillesforever6 posted:Going back to JP3 I just want to say that this really vindicates my childhood hatred of that movie Literally the first thing I thought of when I saw that pic was Jaws, so Jaws as dinosaur would be even more awesome.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 16:09 |
|
exquisite tea posted:Millions of advertising dollars spent, big Thanksgiving Day reveal just to let folks know hey, this lovely-looking movie exists. Keep it on your radar. You either have an amazing eye or are really analyzing the trailer because it looks fine, especially when it's going to be seen out of the corner of someones eye during Dinner or in the haze of a food coma between football games.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 16:14 |
|
I thought it looked pretty bad too, but I think a lot of CGI looks bad in big blockbuster movies these days
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 16:28 |
|
exquisite tea posted:Then why even show those big effect shots at all if they're going to look like junk. Who watches this trailer with plasticene dinos apparently modeled in Unreal 3 and goes "aha yes, I am thoroughly excited for this movie now." The people complaining about the effects are still gonna see this movie.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 16:47 |
|
Mercury Hat posted:They could also play off the Seaworld angle where it came out maybe giant animals need more room to move around. If there's a public shift in opinion like that, it could start to tank your business, especially if your animals cost a huge amount to maintain. I can think of several reasons that jurassic park might not have a great reputation with the population in general.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 17:14 |
|
|
# ? Mar 29, 2024 01:03 |
|
exquisite tea posted:Millions of advertising dollars spent, big Thanksgiving Day reveal just to let folks know hey, this lovely-looking movie exists. Keep it on your radar. Man, all those people that go to the theater this holiday weekend to see it sure are going to feel foolish!
|
# ? Nov 26, 2014 17:20 |