|
I'll play because Hal is playing.
|
#
¿
Dec 14, 2014 09:50
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 19, 2024 03:29 |
|
|
Confirmed.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 14, 2014 22:27
|
|
|
Why turbo and not, you know, look for a replacement if it's really necessary?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2014 03:23
|
|
|
Yeah I agree with you Ernie.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2014 04:22
|
|
|
Because as scum you might be trying too hard to do the townie thing. And really, if ever there was an awkward post, that was it right there. Why did you jump on the bandwagon after being questioned?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2014 04:29
|
|
|
Haha, that'd be pretty pretentious for the Eagles to do a song called Eagle Rock. Or, unimaginative. Either one.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2014 05:37
|
|
|
Epsilon Plus posted:Hey Somber if you don't die can we have our Traditional Townie Slapfight. I would be sad if we did not. How do you know he's not scum?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2014 05:41
|
|
|
Somber is clutching at straws with most of the bandwagon votes. I only feel Proctor, who has the newbie shield, has definitely shown scum signs in regards to the bandwagon. Exakt has possible minor scum signs because I think their bandwagon vote was late and beyond the heat of the moment.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2014 22:36
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:I was -1. I wasn't really counting at the time, but poo poo I can't believe you clowns nearly turbo'd.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2014 22:39
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:Can I ask you to expand on that? I was seriously -1 to lynch there and wanted to say anything meaningful before going out. I'm not sure I get what you're saying since you say I'm clutching at straws but you also agree that Cat was scummy there. Clutching at straws with Ras, I should have been more clear.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2014 22:40
|
|
|
Yeah, I didn't preview reply so it's a null point since you've clarified it.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2014 22:42
|
|
|
Well we're at about a day to go, time to get our poo poo together. I don't even remember when the original deadline was. Hal, are you scum. You're not posting much and I'm worried.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2014 23:02
|
|
|
Ernie. posted:Amoeba is scum and here is why. 1) What? I don't know what you're saying here. Epsilon just came out and said Somber was town, it was just a very uncritical post by Epsilon. 2) Sorry for not following it up. That's not an accusation of Somber, and even if it was it wouldn't be incompatible with Epsilon being scum because bussing is a thing. As for Hal, I only joined the game to play with Hal and he's not even here. I haven't played for over a year, how would I know he hasn't had much of a presence in recent games? I can barely follow what it is you're trying to say man, sorry.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2014 23:28
|
|
|
Alternative to 1) A scum player could call their scumbro town; so no extension should be made.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 01:40
|
|
|
Or I didn't say I thought Epsilon knew Somber was town, only that he was quick to state Somber was town.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 01:47
|
|
|
I guess I'm still waiting for a response from Epsilon.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 01:52
|
|
|
If I thought Epsilon made a scum slip, why wouldn't I have jumped on it? It's meant to be a prod, but Epsilon's invisibility kind of blunts it
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 03:27
|
|
|
Your response seems overly tildy. It doesn't seem natural unless you're yuming.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 03:29
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:Is this Amoeba guy new? Why do you ask?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 03:39
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:Meebs, are you gonna run any more games ever? You're still my favorite mod Maybe next year.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 04:09
|
|
|
I didn't. There was an "if" there. IF I thought Epsilon KNEW Somber was town, as some people interpreted me as saying, that would be something I would think would be a slip.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 04:14
|
|
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:I agree that post was bad. EP seems certain that Somber is town, which he can't know if he is town too. Here's the guy that took it at face value.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 04:20
|
|
|
Epsilon's post at face value, that is.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 04:21
|
|
|
That post by F_v definitely stands out in their post history because I have no idea what they are talking about - not necessarily scummy. But the rest is mild, not anything to think they are scum over. They took Epsilon's joke at face value but I don't really see how that can give an alignment call. I guess I'd really like to see more from fiery.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 04:37
|
|
|
Exakt, can you elaborate more on what's scummy about YPM's play. And is it just Somber playing less aggressive that's giving you vibes, anything else about what he's done?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 04:39
|
|
|
##vote EXAKT Science I don't like his play. Seem a bit opportunistic with their bandwagon on the Somber turbo and their reasoning for now thinking Somber is scummy feels convenient to me.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 04:56
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:I thought his points were pretty valid. I thought they needed elaboration. But EXAKT reads as genuine in his response, so I doubt my call about conveniently finding Somber scummy. And if he's genuine then I'm not confident in my read any more at all. ##unvote
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 06:02
|
|
|
What do you mean by safe vote?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 22:08
|
|
|
What's the point of asking people questions for responses if someone else answers. Sigh. Yeah, Epsilon is looking for a safe vote not scum, and had a forced response to my previous probing question. ##vote Epsilon Plus
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 22:16
|
|
|
Epsilon Plus posted:The vote most likely to hit scum on D1, when we're essentially firing randomly. See here again it doesn't really sound like you think Chic is scum. It's like you're just playing probabilities. It's the language. It's the vibe.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 22:29
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:Pesuming that I am town and Epsilon is scum, what motivation does Epsilon have for pushing CT over me? I don't know why you think you're getting lynched, while you do have votes on you, they aren't that many right now and the trend of the thread is that people don't want to lynch you.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 22:32
|
|
|
Yeah, but I reckon 4 would have been the peak. What are we betting?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 22:36
|
|
|
Chic Trombone posted:More of a presence than I have and that's all it really takes! It's hard to tell Capps is even playing.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 22:41
|
|
|
Epsilon Plus posted:
Just saying how what impression I get. It just sounds like you took a passive stance previously.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 22:42
|
|
Out of everything I've read so far, Chic Trombone is the most likely to be scum in my opinion.
|
Epsilon Plus posted:I really don't like "don't lynch the newbie" as it discounts a potentially valid target of investigation. 
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 23:09
|
|
|
Personally, I'd rather not do a lurker lynch on D1.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 23:17
|
|
|
Hal, if you think we're making a mistake with Epsilon what would you suggest?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 17, 2014 00:48
|
|
|
Time for people to weigh in on this and get their opinions out early, because it's no good just coming in at the deadline and scrambling to a vote. F_v, Ernie, Capps, Antivehicular, Proctor and Chic have their votes floating around doing nothing on cases they don't seem to be pushing, or they haven't expressed much opinions at all. Town are giving scum an easy cover.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 17, 2014 00:53
|
|
|
Just read Epsilon again and say you think about him.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 17, 2014 01:18
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 19, 2024 03:29 |
|
|
I thought Ernie felt towny at the start, but his absence is noticeable. I did want to ask him what he thought of his case on me in light of my answers, but I just didn't really see the point because his case felt genuine at the time. F_v too felt genuine with their few posts. Either of these two only have their absence as red flags for me - but that's not very indicative with the general lack of participation in the game. I feel like lynching Capps is a no information lynch, and he might come back and provide some content to actually allow for an alignment call.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 17, 2014 01:31
|
|