|
Well that's gonna be another suspension for John Scott it seems.
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 05:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 08:31 |
|
|
lmao at Jackman sitting back down on the bench after he literally couldn't move his arms or legs for 30 seconds
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 05:17
|
|
|
Should that be a penalty, butt-ending is automatic right. Oh yeah no one saw it. Power play anyway
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 05:17
|
|
|
misdirectomy posted:another first nhl goal against the sharks fuckin lmao I'd really love somebody to run the numbers but honestly over the last 20 years I'd be shocked if the Sharks aren't running away with the lead in that category. Oh looks Scott pulled a Scott.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 05:18
|
|
|
"surprised to see Rene Borque on the powerplay" me too sharks announcers, me too.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 05:19
|
|
|
Rip Jackman
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 05:19
|
|
|
Heaf posted:Should that be a penalty, butt-ending is automatic right. Oh yeah no one saw it. Power play anyway Well he didn't butt end him. I don't even think it was actually an elbow but the wrist/forearm area (probably still suspension worthy)
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 05:20
|
|
|
Deer_fire posted:Well he didn't butt end him. I don't even think it was actually an elbow but the wrist/forearm area (probably still suspension worthy) it was close to butt-ending but did look a lot more like a vicious just kind of..chop
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 05:21
|
|
|
Deer_fire posted:Well he didn't butt end him. I don't even think it was actually an elbow but the wrist/forearm area (probably still suspension worthy) It looks like he hit him with the back of his fist, like a chopping motion kind of. I'll have to watch it again after the game is over.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 05:23
|
|
|
good, 5 minutes of no Sestito
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 05:28
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 05:31
|
|
|
dirty burrrrrr
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 05:31
|
|
|
Bitey!
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 05:33
|
|
|
it begins...
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 05:35
|
|
|
Miller 
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 05:35
|
|
|
There's like 5 or 6 guys you could easily have on the PP who'd be better than Borque. Why?
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 05:39
|
|
|
Austrian mook posted:There's like 5 or 6 guys you could easily have on the PP who'd be better than Borque. Why? i mean why not put Silf there. i know he's more defensive but gently caress he knows how to shoot
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 05:42
|
|
|
Heaf posted:i mean why not put Silf there. i know he's more defensive but gently caress he knows how to shoot I'm always surprised he doesn't score more, he's got a pretty sick wrist shot.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 05:44
|
|
|
Austrian mook posted:I'm always surprised he doesn't score more, he's got a pretty sick wrist shot. He's shooting under his career average of 7%; he's seven points away from matching last year. He's also having his luckiest season since he came from Ottawa
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 05:48
|
|
|
Heaf posted:He's shooting under his career average of 7%; he's seven points away from matching last year. He's also having his luckiest season since he came from Ottawa Yeah, lots of guys are having career years this year. Good to see the boys coming together.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 05:53
|
|
|
 GI JOE! 
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 06:03
|
|
|
how on earth was Matthias not awarded a penalty shot
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 06:09
|
|
|
Karlsson! Nice one, kid! edit: I don't have much of an opinion on the Jackman hit by Scott since I'm only half-watching this game, but my opinion is the opposite of Mook's.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 06:14
|
|
|
stop stop they're already dead
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 06:18
|
|
|
MORE GOALS FOR THE GOAL GOD
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 06:20
|
|
|
i think every canuck has been on the ice for a goal for except sestito and stanton
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 06:20
|
|
|
Three PP goals in one game? What is this? I am confused and frightened.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 06:20
|
|
|
toe knee hand posted:i think every canuck has been on the ice for a goal for except sestito and stanton we found the winning formula
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 06:21
|
|
|
toe knee hand posted:i think every canuck has been on the ice for a goal for except sestito and stanton Hmmmmmmmmm... Stanton might be really loving lovely.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 06:23
|
|
|
Every forward has a point except Sestito. Yotes headhunting. Man, if Sestito doesn't go out there and bury Hanzal (or someone) right now, what's even the point of him?
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 06:28
|
|
|
 CAM!
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 06:28
|
|
|
Cammmmmm
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 06:28
|
|
|
Fowler 
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 06:29
|
|
|
Austrian mook posted:Hmmmmmmmmm... Stanton might be really loving lovely. nope
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 06:30
|
|
|
Austrian mook posted:Hmmmmmmmmm... Stanton might be really loving lovely. You should post less. It would dramatically improve everyone's opinion of you.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 06:31
|
|
|
grack posted:You should post less. It would dramatically improve everyone's opinion of you. Is Ryan Stanton not terrible?
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 06:32
|
|
|
Austrian mook posted:Is Ryan Stanton not terrible? Ryan Stanton is a very decent defenseman, especially compared to the idiot we got from Anaheim
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 06:34
|
|
|
grack posted:Ryan Stanton is a very decent defenseman, especially compared to the idiot we got from Anaheim Most of the people I talk to who watch all of the Canucks games have a pretty low opinion of him. E: He also looks pretty bad every time I've watched the Canucks
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 06:35
|
|
|
Being on ice for or against goals has an element of luck to it
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 06:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 08:31 |
|
|
Heaf posted:Being on ice for or against goals has an element of luck to it That, and a players usage, quality of competition, etc.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2014 06:36
|
|