|
I'm in. If I'm town....sorry town.
|
# ¿ Jan 20, 2015 02:30 |
|
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2024 12:14 |
|
I bought PMs just for mafia as well. no rugrats.
|
# ¿ Jan 20, 2015 02:38 |
|
Anidav posted:me.
|
# ¿ Jan 20, 2015 02:43 |
|
*wakes up* *reads the player list*
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2015 01:17 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUGVZ_PNXRo
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2015 03:19 |
|
Bifauxnen posted:literally white noise posting I think that's actually the first time anyone's actually voted for me in mafia. Does that make me a real player now? :3 Nah but realtalk we have to lynch day one. I have seen the
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2015 03:24 |
|
Kommando posted:##vote mithranderp I basically just finished reading the 123012941 posts made since I woke up. You just made my list. Anti-town non-lynching decepticons. May Primus have mercy on your...soul? quote:my list
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2015 03:35 |
|
Anidav posted:Read my lips, not a scum. Do transformers have lips? Kommando posted:For Nah bro that was an ironic post referring to muyb's post in the last game mocking Harold Krell's loose command of the English language.
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2015 03:45 |
|
rudatron posted:As annoying as anidav may be, if he's town then a d1 turbo-lynch only pulls us closer to the edge. Do you actually think he's scum or do you just not want him to play? It would save us all a ridiculous amount of otherwise constructive discussion over the course of the game, arguing whether Anidav is town or scum, because when push comes to shove it probably doesn't matter when he does things like he did in the last game (e.g. fake role claim, hinting heavily that it's SO IMPORTANT that he lives because of REASONS).
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2015 04:12 |
|
If anidav is town, scum can vote for him and hide behind the bandwagon If he's scum, scum can vote for him and be somewhat immune from suspicion for at least a little while. This happened in the game before last, where scum voted out scumidav to "prove" their innocence. scum if you do, scum if you don't.
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2015 04:22 |
|
Kommando posted:No, its because you've outed yourself, not as a dumb townie whos going along for larks, but a savage whos satisfied with the direction of the bandwagon. Day one is quickly becoming a towering inferno of madness. I still think a day one lynch is a good idea, I'm just not sure if an Anidav vote will be useful at all, seeing as scum and town will vote him out alike and there's little information we can actually get from that. Thanks for your post. I needed that. so ##unvote for now but I agree with Fruity that Anidav is a liability regardless of his faction, so I'll re-vote later if need be.
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2015 04:48 |
|
Bifauxnen posted:Not necessarily. Beet and I (and Anidav I guess) certainly proved that wrong in just the last game. This is a bad assumption to make. Yeah, sometimes it can just be like four confused townies just duking it out.
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2015 04:51 |
|
Killing anidav won't really tell us anything: 1. If Anidav is scum, there will be scum in the vote who piled on to make themselves look town. There will be town who protested because they don't want to vote Anidav for no reason. 2. If Anidav is town, there will be scum who protested against the lynch to make themselves look town, AND because no lynch day 1 is good for scum. There will be plenty of town who voted for Anidav because he is distracting/bad for town even if he's town. That being said, I think we should still vote Anidav because he's our best chance of a conviction on day one, and there is at least a chance that we'll end up voting a scum out day one unless someone has more concrete evidence in favour of voting for someone else.
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2015 06:17 |
|
Ironic Sex Tourist posted:plus he's a terrible mafia player, singlehandedly lost town the last game, and is an annoying little poo poo Well, not singlehandedly, but yeah he did create way more confusion than he was worth. He's a bit quieter this game though; whether that's because he's scum or if he's trying not to gently caress poo poo up remains to be seen.
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2015 06:20 |
|
Splode posted:voting for Anidav can be justified because Those On My Left posted:the real argument for lynching anidav is that he has proven himself capable of completely loving up town even when he is a townie. picking a person to lynch on d1 is difficult - there's not a lot to go on. he's as good a lynch as anyone. we're at 16 pages holy poo poo. Yeah I agree with the above. I'd prefer to delay the hammer til later to stimulate more conversation, but I'll vote him when the time comes.
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2015 06:24 |
|
Ironic Sex Tourist posted:I think I didn't really vote for milky BC I put spaces in there but just in case it's confused votegrindr: you gots to bold it
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2015 06:59 |
|
Welp, there's three hours and three votes left so I might as well ##vote anidav
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2015 07:42 |
|
Ironic Sex Tourist posted:Hey Harold Krill Krill probably does stink quite a bit. Poor Howard Krill
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2015 08:11 |
|
Anidav posted:You are right, there will be power roles. Are we gonna be in for another round of Anidav hinting strongly that he has a power role? IDK if you've ever heard about the boy who cried wolf. It's a good story; you might learn something from it.
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2015 08:21 |
|
Avshalom posted:just vote for anidav, that's all we ask of you Is there a link to see the post count? IDK where to look at that.
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2015 08:27 |
|
http://forums.somethingawful.com/misc.php?action=whoposted&threadid=3695636 link for the lazy
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2015 08:32 |
|
Oh hey guys, I just woke up, what's--
|
# ¿ Jan 22, 2015 02:57 |
|
Kommando posted:When did Anidav role claim? He didn't so much claim as he hinted strongly that he had a role.
|
# ¿ Jan 22, 2015 03:00 |
|
Anidav posted:You are right, there will be power roles.
|
# ¿ Jan 22, 2015 03:01 |
|
Ironic Sex Tourist posted:yeah basically I've been feeling pretty poo poo today so tbh have not had much of an interest in mafia today. But I like this post! I think webby throwing shade at bif about previous status was a bit weird seeing as a) your faction/status from previous games has zero impact on your faction status from this game (simple statistics. flipping a coin and getting tails does not increase your chance of getting heads next flip) and b) she has actually been scum recently, but that's meaningless anyway. It might have been a joke but it's just...useless to post. Coming up with stupid poo poo reasons to suspect people is pretty scummy when there's plenty of legit reasons to suspect people. ##vote webmeister
|
# ¿ Jan 22, 2015 06:03 |
|
Lid posted:So when everyone was saying Splode, and I had been saying Splode since yesterday and it would have been easy to go with it, I moved from Splode to bell jar because I think bell jar is a more useless scum but you're reading it as "I decided to bus bell jar for no reason, and also am bussing webmeister". This is of course ignoring that on day one I could have y'know just gone along with the Anidav kill rather than trying to supposedly "bus" my teammates. The problem is, we all kinda knew that data about the Anidav vote wouldn't/couldn't disprove anyone's guilt or innocence. Mithranderp posted:Killing anidav won't really tell us anything: Trying to use not voting for Anidav to support your innocence isn't really going to get you far.
|
# ¿ Jan 22, 2015 06:31 |
|
Bifauxnen posted:I do like this webmeister case, and I'm hoping that's the only reason it's caught on with all these people flying out of the woodwork to vote for it, after all the other cases today had sat around at 1-2 votes. All this flying in on just the last case of the day makes me nervous. After reading the thread and IST's post about webby it made more sense than the (relatively) baseless accusations that were otherwise being thrown around. And also my morning was kinda poo poo so I didn't feel like posting in Mafia. But I have been reading.
|
# ¿ Jan 22, 2015 06:41 |
|
Seagull posted:##unvote Eh, there's no point in "holding off until later" because there are still six (now seven) votes needed, and we're not even halfway any more. We do still have just over four hours, and it's good to hold off on the hammer, but don't leave it too late.
|
# ¿ Jan 22, 2015 07:41 |
|
Harold Krell posted:What happens if we don't get 6 more votes in time? Nothing. Nobody gets lynched.
|
# ¿ Jan 22, 2015 07:41 |
|
Mithranderp posted:Eh, there's no point in "holding off until later" because there are still six (now seven) votes needed, and we're not even halfway any more. We do still have just over four hours, and it's good to hold off on the hammer, but don't leave it too late. Wait I was wrong, there are still six votes, I thought Seagull had unvoted from webmeister. MY BAD.
|
# ¿ Jan 22, 2015 07:42 |
|
I think there is circumstantial evidence that actually points to IST being the real target of one of last night's attacks. IST led the charge against webmeister, had good logic, and is doing active scumhunting that seems to bear fruit (at least it did once). I think Beets might have realised that, and used his night action to protect IST from the inevitable attack on him. I just had breakfast so I just skimmed the thread while I was eating. But for now, since IST seems to have a good nose: ##vote Plotterboy
|
# ¿ Jan 23, 2015 03:31 |
|
Bifauxnen posted:If IST is scum, he singlehandedly made the whole case and started the bandwagon on webmeister, when there was no chatter around him before. That is some amazingly proactive throwing under the bus. I agree with this; however we have had situations where scum have thrown each other under the bus so that they can appear less like scum. Furthermore, I have no reason to doubt black_tangled's role claim and data. I also have something that will maybe back b_t's claim up (and in light of what they revealed it actually kinda makes sense) and will reveal it if people need more evidence. So, in light of everything: ##vote Ironic Sex Tourist.
|
# ¿ Jan 23, 2015 05:50 |
|
Bifauxnen posted:WHAT IS GOING ON I thought you guys were all pointing fingers at each other but now you're all agreeing somehow on IST who's like the only one we can see has nabbed scum in the day?! black_tangled (in watcher role) saw that IST visited Avs last night. Avs died.
|
# ¿ Jan 23, 2015 05:55 |
|
Lid posted:WITH THAT SAID This is entirely possible. If we have a vig (likely) and one mafia team then it only explains two deaths last night. Unless we have two vigilantes, I guess.
|
# ¿ Jan 23, 2015 05:57 |
|
Mithranderp posted:I agree with this; however we have had situations where scum have thrown each other under the bus so that they can appear less like scum. Furthermore, I have no reason to doubt black_tangled's role claim and data. I also have something that will maybe back b_t's claim up (and in light of what they revealed it actually kinda makes sense) and will reveal it if people need more evidence. So, in light of everything: Also my "evidence" only makes sense if I'm correct about a particular game mechanic AND IT'S SO loving HARD TO FIGURE OUT but I really don't want to roleclaim today plzthx
|
# ¿ Jan 23, 2015 05:59 |
|
black_tangled posted:I'm new but is it possible to clarify your question via PM with Asphyxious or is that not kosher? I think no because it would give me information beyond what my role is supposed to do?
|
# ¿ Jan 23, 2015 06:03 |
|
Milky - his in character posts are fun but he's not really being as helpful as he could be. Harold - I think he has somewhat been pulled into line (whether that's by other scum or if he's realised that people find him annoying IDK) but beyond that, most (all?) of his posts have been white noise. IST - He went after webby pretty hard, which could have been a scum setup a la anidav a few games back. I don't think b_t would be stupid enough as to lie about IST visiting avshalom. So either he's scum or he's our vigilante.
|
# ¿ Jan 23, 2015 06:44 |
|
Those aren't in any sort of order btw. Can people elucidate on their suspicions for Lid and Splode? I've been skimming mostly today because I've been playing vidya games and enjoying the weather (rain all day! )
|
# ¿ Jan 23, 2015 06:46 |
|
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2024 12:14 |
|
Harold Krell posted:I can still excite your wiles if you want me to. my wiles are fine as they are tyvm
|
# ¿ Jan 23, 2015 06:53 |