|
|
I get what you're going for here DCT butNietzsche would troll the gently caress out of anyone who used smilies. |
#
?
Feb 7, 2015 00:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 20:40 |
|
Funnypost Collabo posted:I get what you're going for here DCT butNietzsche would troll the gently caress out of anyone who used smilies. Nietzsche trolling: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alHu-nGqDHY ---------------- |
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2015 00:29
|
|
|
|
nietzsche is a piece of poo poo for not having an easy to pronounce name
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2015 00:30
|
|
|
|
The surest way to corrupt a youth is to install emoji on his iPhone |
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2015 00:32
|
|
|
|
Bwee posted:nietzsche is a piece of poo poo for not having an easy to pronounce name I think it sounds kind of Neit |
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2015 00:32
|
|
|
|
Bwee posted:nietzsche is a piece of poo poo for not having an easy to pronounce name |
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2015 00:35
|
|
|
|
Bwee posted:nietzsche is a piece of poo poo for not having an easy to pronounce name it's not so hard. he's a piece of poo poo for a bunch of other reasons |
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2015 00:37
|
|
|
|
Funnypost Collabo posted:The surest way to corrupt a youth is to install emoji on his iPhone |
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2015 00:47
|
|
|
|
If you meet the Buddha on the road, install emoji on his iPhone
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2015 01:02
|
|
|
|
Bwee posted:If you meet the Buddha on the road, install emoji on his iPhone
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2015 01:02
|
|
|
|
My favorite part of the name Neitzsche is that you can mutter "eat poo poo" under your breath and then just say "oh, no, sorry, I was thinking about Neitzsche" |
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2015 01:07
|
|
Funnypost Collabo posted:My favorite part of the name Neitzsche is that you can mutter "eat poo poo" under your breath and then just say "oh, no, sorry, I was thinking about Neitzsche" ---------------- |
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2015 01:23
|
|
|
|
old white men |
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2015 01:28
|
|
|
|
Holy moly I just found and read this whole thread and it's a very good thread where the feck was "this guy" (  ) 2 months ago(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST) ☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭ |
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2015 01:05
|
|
|
|
cajn someone smart tell me why peter singer is a retard
---------------- |
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2015 02:14
|
|
|
|
CAT BRUSH posted:the first one because he is beyond good and evil |
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2015 14:32
|
|
|
|
suicide bi cop posted:cajn someone smart tell me why peter singer is a retard he's not he just isn't that good and he is too exacting about nebulous things i.e. he's like a utilitarian and analytic if i recall. but i dont think he is having a bad effect on the world or creating a bunch of intolerable pedants, its tempting to think he's like the richard dawkins of food but rlly he's not |
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2015 14:35
|
|
|
|
I'm a philosophy teacher and student, ask me anything
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2015 14:35
|
|
|
|
Bwee posted:I'm a philosophy teacher and student, ask me anything what are ur thoughts on peter singer and effective altruism ---------------- |
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2015 14:37
|
|
|
|
peter SEEGER on the other hand |
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2015 14:38
|
|
|
|
suicide bi cop posted:what are ur thoughts on peter singer and effective altruism I think altruism is nice  You're helping your friends.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2015 14:39
|
|
|
|
Bwee posted:I think altruism is nice can utilitarianism be good? ive read arguments for and against, it seems like the arguments against focus on defining it rigidly or saying "it's not utilitarian anymore if theres exceptions" which seems dumb to me, if the general idea is doing the most good for the most people ---------------- |
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2015 14:41
|
|
one of my friends really likes peter singer and donates a ton of his income to charity, is a vegetarian, and is also one of the nicest people i know. 
---------------- |
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2015 14:49
|
|
|
|
dogcrash truther posted:Do you think free will is a useful or meaningful concept? No, and neither is determinism |
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2015 14:52
|
|
|
|
suicide bi cop posted:cajn someone smart tell me why peter singer is a retard hes not that, but his ideas are of limited...utility >
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2015 14:53
|
|
|
|
[in physicist voice] philosophy is trash
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2015 14:54
|
|
|
|
[in dpimpjedi voice] physics is philosophy |
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2015 15:00
|
|
|
|
Bwee posted:hello, please give me, a scientist, a crash course in philosophy of science. i know of/about thomas kuhn and paradigm shifts and popper and falsification but is their work still considered "correct"? most scientists are extremely nonphilosophical and most don't even want to know this stuff but i do and am curious. thanks kuhn is cool but it seems like most people think science is converging toward something, even a lot of scientists |
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2015 15:04
|
|
|
|
philo -> have sex with sophy -> knowledge
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2015 15:04
|
|
|
|
suicide bi cop posted:can utilitarianism be good? ive read arguments for and against, it seems like the arguments against focus on defining it rigidly or saying "it's not utilitarian anymore if theres exceptions" which seems dumb to me, if the general idea is doing the most good for the most people Yes
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2015 15:11
|
|
|
|
i feel liek ive gotten even more questions that when i came into this thread
---------------- |
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2015 15:13
|
|
suicide bi cop posted:i feel liek ive gotten even more questions that when i came into this thread that;s the power of philosophy 
---------------- |
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2015 15:24
|
|
suicide bi cop posted:can utilitarianism be good? ive read arguments for and against, it seems like the arguments against focus on defining it rigidly or saying "it's not utilitarian anymore if theres exceptions" which seems dumb to me, if the general idea is doing the most good for the most people The usual go-to criticism of utilitarianism is that whether it's positive (generating most happiness) or negative (minimizing suffering) it's almost impossible to agree on an objective measure of happiness or suffering. Like, how do you measure 0.1 happiness? ---------------- |
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2015 18:41
|
|
|
|
With a happinometer
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2015 18:42
|
|
|
of course there is an objective happiness measure and it's really straight forward but not many academic peer-review types are willing to count "fat spliffs" as a unit of happiness.
---------------- |
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2015 18:43
|
|
|
|
in sexual response studies they tie a little wire thingy with your willy and see what makes it jump to tell when ur feelin froggy is that like a happinemeter?
☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭ |
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2015 00:00
|
|
|
|
POWERBALL posted:one of my friends really likes peter singer and donates a ton of his income to charity, is a vegetarian, and is also one of the nicest people i know. peter singer thinks youre an incredibly bad person for not doing that |
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2015 00:10
|
|
|
|
suicide bi cop posted:can utilitarianism be good? ive read arguments for and against, it seems like the arguments against focus on defining it rigidly or saying "it's not utilitarian anymore if theres exceptions" which seems dumb to me, if the general idea is doing the most good for the most people the problem people have with utilitarianism is basically this as far as i can tell: if you're a utilitarian, and you encounter the trolley problem (look it up itll make the post long), you should kill the one man if you take the position further and make it so instead of flipping a switch you have to actively kill another person, then you should still kill them. that second problem, in my experience divides people, so you might agree so far, but it definitely leads to things most people intuitively think are unethical. here's an example: you're a doctor in a small town, and one day a man appears out of thin air in front of you; he has no home or family and you do some tests or whatever and he is perfectly healthy. you notice that he has some perfectly healthy organs which would really help out your patients who have some less healthy organs whose families are sad about it. a perfect utilitarian would kill him without hesitation. most people, i think, wouldn't kill him at all. |
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2015 00:22
|
|
|
|
define "good." now quantify "greatest good." now touch your left elbow with your left hand because you've already done the impossible twice today |
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2015 00:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 20:40 |
|
|
|
from page 2:Hick Magnet posted:Define "best" good progress so far |
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2015 01:02
|
|
