In
|
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2015 03:47 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 20, 2024 01:17 |
Bifauxnen posted:Aw, really? Don't know if it's too early and you're still joking around, but I thought he really changed his game up a lot last time. He was throwing out a lot of genuine analysis, and even though not all of it hit the mark there were some theories in there that were right. Milky Moor posted:I WILL NOT GO QUIETLY Bifauxnen posted:oh my god you suuuuuuck That seems a little pre-meditated to me
|
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2015 21:51 |
Sitting directly next to the head of credit for Australia means no posting for me today. Sorry. Roleclaim - vanilla town, Greg hunt.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2015 06:27 |
Did my earlier post not go through?
|
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2015 07:08 |
Mithranderp posted:I'm not really trying to clear the front bench. It's more that I'm trying to figure out what significance (if any) the flavour has in faction alignment. Greg Hunt
|
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2015 07:33 |
Bifauxnen posted:I've been waiting to see if someone else besides me would react first to Tithin just straight up name AND roleclaiming as vanilla town. This is another possible detriment of your plan, TOML. People start volunteering more than they need for no reason. Scum know I'm not scum, so flavour and role claiming has no detriment - people were doing it earlier and it's the only part of the conversation I have time to contribute to at present. Heads up though, I'm irl in an all day union meeting tomorrow so uh, probably not posting much then either. Should be fine after that, assuming I'm not night killed by polite scum.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2015 07:36 |
To clarify - it has no detriment when I'm V. T. Otherwise yeah, I'd not be role claiming
|
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2015 07:43 |
Bifauxnen posted:I think it still can, cause then scum could just look elsewhere if they're trying to hit a power role. Unless they think you're just faking them out by claiming to be vanilla, but that would be like a reverse Anidav move and not one I think you'd make if you had to explain your hidden role later. Good point, I hadn't consisted that in my mentality. It's not a reverse Anidav move though, straight up townie.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2015 08:04 |
When does the day end?
|
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2015 08:06 |
I don't have a strong opinion on who's scum and who's not. Smart scum through out just enough shares of grey and white noise posting to stay visible but appear scum hunting, which is the impression I'm getting from toml. Synchronised posting of Beet and Bif is a cause for concern but not enough to be so unduly on day 1 - they're both excellent players and could just be picking up on the same trail. The three way poo poo fest makes me reluctant to vote for any of the trio as if we do and they are town, we weaken ourselves immeasurably. Of the 3, I'd be most willing to vote toml.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2015 08:23 |
loving SMART PHONES, WHO'S BEEN loving WITH MY PREDICTIVE TEXT
|
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2015 08:24 |
Matthew Beet posted:this is a good post. My absence that game was tangential to the fact that I was super busy, and I even said as much in the post game and apologised for it, much like I'm apologising for it now. For perspective, I don't get forum access on my work pc, it's all phone posting for me and when I'm sitting next to someone who can fire me for gently caress all reason except that I look weird and have a funny accent, my focus is less on mafia and more on the job. So it's disingenuous to say that I was scum and absent, because it implies it was done as a strategy, but I was also doing real life poo poo. It wasn't a strategy to hide from probing eyes, much like it isn't this game. Christ, toml, who I think is suss as gently caress this game will back me up that we had to coordinate votes at night via email because I couldn't get home until late to discuss on the google docs. Sorry, stressful day and tomorrow looks to be even worse.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2015 09:25 |
Mills posted:There will be some roles.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2015 09:31 |
Matthew Beet posted:[quote="tithin" post="441373774"] Do you not see the link you made? "last game tithin was scum, he was absent. He's been mostly absent this game." The implication (not Conclusion - you'd rather leave that for others to take away of their own volition) being that I'm scum and that my absence is strategical.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2015 09:34 |
Matthew Beet posted:I know what I was implying because it was deliberate. And with minimal prompting I got you to say it instead of me. Funny that.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2015 09:52 |
Votefinder, what's the tally.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2015 09:55 |
##vote Tirade Irritating roleplaying.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2015 10:02 |
[quote="Matthew Beet"post="441374559"]it's known as gasping g as straws. [/quote]
|
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2015 10:20 |
Got some real missed opportunities beet by continuing to use grasping as opposed to gasping.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2015 10:22 |
Early shotgun voting fucks up my scumdar because it really looks suss as gently caress with hindsight and while I get that for you guys (bif & beet) it's a way of generating ~data~, all it really does is muddy the waters a lot for everyone else. In the last game you tried it, it led to a perfect scum win because you guys went on to fight amongst yourself for days.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2015 22:51 |
Bifauxnen posted:yeah this is what I was talking about Tithin, that's another one now that needs to proclaim how they're vanilla town. Although maybe some of them are vanilla scum instead. Matthew Beet posted:well maybe bif should stop acting scummy. My point being that in either respect it's a liability for town. You either as town, muddy the waters and fight amongst yourselves as the last few games and weaken town, or you're using it as meta cover to hide in plain sight as scum.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2015 23:25 |
Those On My Left posted:I'm getting a bit tired of the Beet/Gaspy show (look at those posting statistics) so I'm going to chill until some more interesting things get said (hopefully by other people). "I'm tired of only two people posting, therefore I'm not going to post"
|
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2015 23:29 |
I mentioned yesterday that I was gonna be in an all day union meeting today. Vote for me if you like, but I'm exactly who I say I am. Should be free at lunch.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 11, 2015 01:31 |
I've had a brief scan over lunch. The milky argument has legs, but the problem with a milky vote is that he uh, everything he does has implications of scumminess. If he scores scum kills, he's dangerous because it's usually a front. If he doesn't, then he could be changing his meta. I'm more inclined to vote for him in the grounds that how he's posting now is the exact same as he was in the last all Vanilla game that mills ran and that bif won single handedly. ##vote milky moor I still think that toml is likely scum at this stage, but I'm out until 7-8pm, and no one seems too focused on him.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 11, 2015 02:55 |
I don't see anything wrong with what I've written. If you disagree with it, tell me why you disagree with it, tell me what's inaccurate, preferrably without the insults.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 11, 2015 08:38 |
Milky Moor posted:Or, y'know, caring about the longevity of this town if I'm not in control of it. That's not exactly helpful to your case, when combined with Milky Moor posted:But you have a pretty big interest in establishing and controlling a narrative. Probably the most vital part of a scum role and it's something I do very well.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 11, 2015 08:46 |
Avshalom posted:i'm kind of having trouble understanding this current argument, i'm extremely exhausted so it's probably much simpler than i think but please be kind to me You're not wrong. My vote for Milky was in case I couldn't get back tonight, and I'm here now. ##unvote I don't get what game milky's playing at here, it's now how he usually goes. At this stage I'm torn between TOML, Gaspy and Milky.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 11, 2015 08:51 |
Milky Moor posted:weird, no. it's not. i wonder why that is I've played many games with you, as town together, scum together, and opposing. The only game I've seen you post like this is the one i mentioned earlier - surely you can understand why this would give me pause.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 11, 2015 08:56 |
black_tangled posted:Here is a basic level question, why is Milky Moor going off his nut? Here's a basic level question, why are you provoking him?
|
|
# ¿ Feb 11, 2015 09:17 |
15 minutes eh. I'm not keen on voting for Milky.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 11, 2015 09:46 |
Bifauxnen posted:So he never said outright "oh yeah, Milky is town", guess it'd be easier to just ask him at this point - Tithin why were you backing off of Milky? I backed off because he was making sense and there was enough doubt that I was hesitant to vote. He managed to lay enough seeds of doubt between his posting and the content that I could tell there was genuine frustration there, it was trying to differentiate between "Frustrated townie" and "frustrated scum" that was giving me pause. I wasn't expecting him to be hammered so "quickly" (less than 5 minutes after I made that post). Honestly, I'm looking at the poo poo flinging that's occurred this morning with quite a critical eye. Asphyxious is the person highest on my list right now (thought TOML's still up there), in part because of the direct accusation from Milky, and in part because of his conduct since the game started. It's shithouse. Sorry for the lack of effort posting, I've called in to work today due to kids being fuckwits overnight, I've had a total of about 2.5 hours disturbed sleep overnight, so I'm in a foul mood
|
|
# ¿ Feb 11, 2015 22:56 |
Asphyxious posted:I still feel like something obvious has been missed. People have started placing Milky's lynch on me, which is garbage. Other than Avs and kinda sorta Tithin (who both then voted for him...) I was one of the only people encouraging milky to say or do anything that could be helpful. wind that the gently caress back I voted for him early as a safety measure because I was gonna be busy most of the day I then got home and unvoted for him, and didn't revote for him at the end of the night Stop trying to re-write history. My name wasn't on his succesful lynch.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 11, 2015 23:17 |
Bifauxnen posted:Maybe it read so differently to me cause that's how I behaved in my first scum game when I was in a tight spot. And it's how he behaved when we were scum together whenever he wasn't getting his way yet. Possibly my paranoia but this is reading funny to me. It's too ... clean. Either way, i reckon it's gaspy at this stage, and I'm voting for him ##vote asphyxious
|
|
# ¿ Feb 11, 2015 23:28 |
Matthew Beet posted:Making Sense how? What seeds of doubt? He screamed and yelled and insulted people. That's persuasive? Go re-read his poo poo from the perspective of frustrated townie and it makes perfect sense. I still think it was a dumb play, but the frustration was evident and that gave me pause. Interestingly, you're giving me pressure about not voting for someone who's flipped town - I'd be very interested in re-reading the original chain of logic that led people to want to vote for him in the first place.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 11, 2015 23:30 |
Asphyxious posted:Hokay that's 3 votes out of 6 which has hit the parameters for my next action. I genuinely don't believe you. Asides from it being an incredibly *rare* role, it's way too small a game to have a beloved princess in - especially considering the theme, and the fact that Mills is pretty vanilla with his roles all told. Even if you are telling the truth, outing that piece of information means you're probably going to die tonight to scum (Given no doctor), and we're going to lose a day turn anyway, so I'm sticking to my vote and calling your bluff.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 11, 2015 23:37 |
Asphyxious posted:Also tithins reasoning is bullshit. "Oh you're probably bluffing so instead of selecting another target lets just guarantee 2/3 town deaths" How the gently caress is it bullshit? It's a lovely role that's typically only done in a madness game because it weakens town if a beloved princess dies that much! Let's take you at your word then, you're town and a beloved princess. With 11 alive, it's 6 votes to lynch. If we keep you alive tonight, and murder someone else, you die tonight because you're a big dumb baby trying to save your skin. Suddenly it's 9 alive, and 5 to lynch. Only whoops, it's actually 8 alive and 4 to lynch because scum get another night kill. Whereas if we kill you, it's going to be the exact same loving setup because we lynch you (10 alive, 5 to lynch) and then scum get two night kills (8 alive, 4 to kill). In either respect we're hosed That's why I'm calling your bluff, because no matter what happens, we're going to be in the same position, and frankly I don't believe you
|
|
# ¿ Feb 11, 2015 23:47 |
I'm willing to stake my life on it at this stage.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2015 00:00 |
Asphyxious posted:No I know, how about someone pushing super loving hard for lynching a princess AND washing his hands of a confirmed town lynch. Yeah ok, go for me, two things #1 - I'm exactly who i said I am, Vanilla Town, Greg Hunt #2 - If I'm going down, I'm pointing fingers. See, I still don't believe you're town, but you've built up enough cred through someone claiming detective, and your own role claim that you live another day. Fantastic, good job. So in order of most suspicious for me, there's two lots 2.1, TOML, Gaspy, WFD 2.2, Beet, Bif, Gaspy I reckon that Avs was right on the money that traditional big L liberals are the scum in this game, and if gaspy's claimed T. "loving" abbott, he's leading you by the loving nose. So go on, vote for me and end this farce.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2015 00:14 |
Honestly, thinking about it, if there WERE a beloved princess, it'd be Peta loving Credlin, with Abbott as the bodyguard.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2015 00:17 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 20, 2024 01:17 |
Those On My Left posted:Doubtful. Spill happens in party room, pretty sure party room is sitting members only, not their staffers. (Happy to be corrected on this, never been in a party room.) It's not completely based on party politics though, if it's based on Kommando posted:Another idea: Given how much Abbott's put in for Credlin to keep her position, it'd no be a surprise if this were the case.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2015 00:21 |