|
##vote Punt
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 05:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 20, 2024 02:06 |
|
|
##vote Punt
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 05:58
|
|
|
F_v and mills, your moves.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 05:58
|
|
|
Only doing this to avoid a no lynch ##vote Punt
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 05:58
|
|
|
Mills, your move.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 05:59
|
|
|
Yeah I'm pretty sure this is a wrong one too, oh well.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 05:59
|
|
|
Down to the wire!
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 05:59
|
|
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:Only doing this to avoid a no lynch ##vote Punt If Punt flips scum, fv is town, if not, this is a bad post.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 05:59
|
|
|
Grandicap posted:If Punt flips scum, fv is town, if not, this is a bad post.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 06:00
|
|
|
Grandicap posted:If Punt flips scum, fv is town, if not, this is a bad post. It would be if this was the only time I'd backed Punt.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 06:00
|
|
|
Moot point, no lynch. Okay back to friday fun times.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 06:01
|
|
|
The crews bickers throughout the day, but cannot decide who is responsible for the captain's death and head off to sleep. Perhaps tomorrow will bring greater clarity. Night actions are due within 48 hours. Would you guys prefer Thursday deadlines? pm me if you'd prefer that or Fridays.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 06:07
|
|
|
Thread is re-opening tomorrow at noon, night actions are due by then.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 01:23
|
|
|
The ship awakens at the crack of dawn and assembles on deck. When the headcount is taken the crew finds that one among their number is missing, Tremendous Taste. Checking his bunk they find him awash in a pool of his own blood, dead. Clearly the deaths would not stop here, they had to find who did this. Tremendous Taste, Vanilla Town, has died Night 1 The game is now open, deadline is Thursday at Midnight. Also, if you had fewer posts than 15 yesterday, please post more today. VVV It's changed now, sorry VVV Ixtlilton fucked around with this message at 18:53 on Mar 2, 2015 |
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 18:38
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 2 Not Voting (14): 100YrsofAttitude, DuckHuntDog, Eight Dollars, Ernie., EXAKT Science, fiery_valkyrie, Grandicap, Hal Incandenza, Lumpen, Mills, Puntification, Rascyc, Tremendous Taste, wall monitorWith 14 alive, it's 8 votes to lynch. The current deadline is March 06th, 2015 at midnight EST -- that's in about 3 days, 11 hours.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 18:52
|
|
|
I request a final votecount for D1 and a link to Votefinder in the OP, please. I continue to prefer lynching Grandicap, DHD, Puntification. I mention that nightkilling Tremendous Taste, a useless lurker, seems very Grandicappian. I applaud the choice. I wish to bring attention to the fact that Hal Incandenza has only 10 posts, which is less than Tremendous Taste. Hal said to me, D1: Hal Incandenza posted:I don't see the case on Punt, I tend to agree with mills. Of those 4 suspects, given that Punt didn't get lynched due to Mills preferring DHD, I suggest lynching DHD. ##Vote DHD
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 18:54
|
|
|
Weird.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 18:59
|
|
|
Oh DHD is one of your scum reads. Nevermind. I've completely forgot about what was happening in this game.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 19:00
|
|
|
hmm ##vote eightbux yesterday his play was cautious and not at all town and carefree and he didn't try to stop any cases, leaving his options open
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 19:09
|
|
|
Final Votecount for Day 1: Puntification (6): Lumpen, Tremendous Taste (2): EXAKT Science, Grandicap (1): Rascyc, Eight Dollars, Lumpen, Lumpen (1): EXAKT Science, Lynch No One! (1): Tremendous Taste Mills (1): EXAKT Science EXAKT Science (0): Mills, Lumpen, fiery_valkyrie (0): Lumpen, wall monitor (0): wall monitor, 100YrsofAttitude (0): wall monitor, DuckHuntDog (0): Mills, Not Voting (1): Hal Incandenza With 14 alive, it's 8 votes to lynch. The current deadline is February 28th, 2015 at midnight EST -- that's in about 23 minutes. Kumbamontu Replaces EXAKT Science! Ixtlilton fucked around with this message at 19:15 on Mar 2, 2015 |
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 19:11
|
|
|
i'm surprised lumpen doesn't think both puntification and i are scum
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 19:13
|
|
|
Lumpen posted:Looking at what Punt produced, I am additionally convinced that Punt argues in bad faith. fiery_valkyrie posted:Can you elaborate how you think Punt argues in bad faith? I agree with his case. Lumpen posted:A Scum argues in bad faith by nature. If you agree with the case then I can only urge you to read more closely and critically. If I am mislynched, it will be you who failed to act correctly on the evidence. How does punt argue in bad faith? A scum argues in bad faith by nature. Punt is scum is not the proposition or conclusion of his arguments they are axiomatic to them, he is working backwards from his position that I am scum to make his arguments, I do like the irony that his arguments are about people arguing in bad faith because one of us definitely is. Lumpen posted:I will vote for any of my three top suspects. You should probably also note that not only have neither of me or grandi flipped but Lumpen and I were tied for vote leader when I went to bed before the deadline with grandicap on 1 vote. I'm not gonna vote anyone else but lumpen today. ##vote lumpen
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 19:18
|
|
|
Ernie. posted:i'm surprised lumpen doesn't think both puntification and i are scum
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 19:30
|
|
|
Starting off d1 with a self proclaimed tunnel, cool.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 19:30
|
|
|
Lumpen posted:Why? What Scummy thing haven't I noticed about you? i unvoted punt and that semi-caused the no-cuddle
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 19:31
|
|
|
Punt just disengage with lumpen for like 24 hrs and try to scum hunt at least
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 19:32
|
|
|
Ernie. posted:i unvoted punt and that semi-caused the no-cuddle I'll bring it up enough to say I think the context is different enough
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 19:34
|
|
|
Ernie. posted:i'm surprised lumpen doesn't think both puntification and i are scum Did you lurk through deadline in order to not hammer Puntification, after suddenly contradicting your own previous vote? That seems like the worst thing on you so far.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 19:35
|
|
|
Ernie. posted:i unvoted punt and that semi-caused the no-cuddle
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 19:36
|
|
|
Lumpen posted:I mention that nightkilling Tremendous Taste, a useless lurker, seems very Grandicappian. I applaud the choice. Taste died due to this post: Tremendous Taste posted:I'm going to shoot someone tonight Yes he lurked but he threatened a night action. Why take that chance?
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 19:52
|
|
|
Lumpen posted:Of those 4 suspects, given that Punt didn't get lynched due to Mills preferring DHD, I suggest lynching DHD. I do not follow you at all here. Why do you all of the sudden want to execute DHD? If anything Mills play last night is the most curious.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 19:52
|
|
|
Hello everyone! I speedread the game last night but didn't digest much of it so I will do what I can to catch up in a useful fashion sometime today.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 19:54
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:Taste died due to this post:
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 19:56
|
|
|
I voted him last night and I don't regret it but I've begun to cool on Punt partly because of this post:Lumpen posted:Some of my early posting served as trollin', and that should be obvious by reading it in context (as I suggested comparing my post to wall monitor's above it), but as bait for the sort of thing an opportunistic Scum would try to fake-case. Punt fell for it, and forced out a bad faith excuse for a case. Can you see that? I don't know how much I believe you in regards to setting out a honey pot on purpose. Either way Punt had several cases, one against me, which I found incorrect, and one against you that pointed out more how dickish you played more than anything else. Yet, his posting reminds me of my own at times. Spectacularly wrong but town. Mills brought up a good point that I missed. There was genuine emotion there and while wrong, they didn't fake it. I will take a closer look at Mills because he did a similar thing to Ernie, whose honesty sets him apart. I also don't think that Lumpen or Punt should act so hard-headed especially now that Day 2 has begun.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 19:56
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:You can't really believe this. A bit yeah. I don't think anyone took that post seriously but why would Taste make a better lurker lynch over another? If anything the scum could've done the mod a favor and hit the person bound to get replaced. It's a good lynch since we don't get new information and they remove the very slight chance of Taste's vig in case they hadn't joked.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 19:58
|
|
|
Why would you cool on someone based on someone scum reading said someone?
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 19:59
|
|
|
Fill in the correct names for 'someone'
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 19:59
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:A bit yeah. I don't think anyone took that post seriously but why would Taste make a better lurker lynch over another? If anything the scum could've done the mod a favor and hit the person bound to get replaced. It's a good lynch since we don't get new information and they remove the very slight chance of Taste's vig in case they hadn't joked.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 20:03
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:Why would you cool on someone based on someone scum reading said someone? It reminds me of me. I think Punt's said several incorrect things. Lumpen even says he served himself up to be a trap case. I've fallen for such things in the best and I've also cased people quite adamantly but very incorrectly. Wrong does not equal scum necessarily. Also re-reading Punt following Mills post (reading them in isolation) shows a lot more genuine frustration than anything else. I should've probably put that first but with both these things taken into consideration, my opinion on Punt has changed.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 20:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 20, 2024 02:06 |
|
|
Rascyc posted:Why does it particularly matter if a lurker died in the night? This is all ultimately NK speculation and meaningless. You could derive a half dozen thoughts from TT dying, especially if you use Grandi's self professed meta crap but it is still outright speculation. It doesn't matter, I just wanted to remark on what Lumpen had posted. Following my logic (threatened vig led to his death) we get even less information from his death. I don't want to case anyone using Taste's death, that's Lumpen who mentioned Grandicap and last night's execution in the same breath.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2015 20:06
|
|