|
I'm am in. I guess I'll have to do what you say.
|
#
¿
Feb 16, 2015 03:54
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 17, 2024 00:46 |
|
|
Gentlemen.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2015 01:50
|
|
|
Those On My Left posted:there are women in here too mate Them too.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2015 02:04
|
|
|
Something about this seems fishy, but I'm too stupid to put the pieces together. I think Mills is up to something.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2015 08:27
|
|
|
Anidav's and Mill's earlier posting could all be an elaborate faux conflict. For all we know, they're on the same side, which might explain Mill's suddenly changing his vote as we approached hammertime. It could be a double bluff on both of their parts.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2015 09:29
|
|
|
90 minutes can be a long time. Nobody panic.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2015 09:34
|
|
|
If we string up Anidav and they are scum, I'm still convinced Mills should probably be next. If we do that, that will be two scum in two days. Minus whoever gets night killed. Which I am suspecting at this stage, will be me. If Anidav is innocent we can definitely string up Coq the next day. A guaranteed scum lynch in two days of play seems like a good deal. Either vote will be productive in my opinion. Probably going to flip a coin, personally.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2015 10:17
|
|
|
Gaspy got all the brains. ## vote Anidav
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2015 10:32
|
|
|
Mills posted:I think lynching Anidav will be a mistake. Naturally.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2015 10:38
|
|
|
Mills posted:I honestly hope Gwyn flips scum down the line and it was a big joke post. Sorry dude. Just thick.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2015 10:41
|
|
|
Anidav posted:Splode is just fishing at this point. Please calm down. You two are certainly looking out for eachother.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2015 10:44
|
|
|
Anidav posted:I'm just familiar with what he does, are you? Not really. So it'll look really bad if I'm right, but I think it's safe to say I'm not. It's day one and this beats a coin toss. erm. even though that's why how I picked between you and coq.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2015 10:51
|
|
|
Tirade posted:Quiet players - hiddenmovement, gwynplaine, dj-bbq - speak up. What are your thoughts about yesterday? Who are you suss on? I think given how worthless my insight proved, I'm much better off just watching a little longer.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 02:48
|
|
|
black_tangled posted:Aw, no don't be put off by people being jerks, get involved It's not being a jerk if someones absolutely right. I'll be involved, but I need to be less eager.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 02:53
|
|
|
Part of the problem is that even when I suspect something, I can't find the words to explain it. Something neglected to mention is that my suspicion of MIlls was based on the idea that his actions were some sort of elaborate triple bluff.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 03:04
|
|
|
Tirade posted:Also rule #1 of mafia, beyond any tips about how to be a good townie etc, is don't take mafia seriously or personally. Which, incidentally, anidav clearly hasn't learned yet. I take it personally when the sidewalk has the unmitigated gall to trip me up. Games like this are helping immensely with that.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 03:08
|
|
|
I should mention well in advance: I'm working a night job, but its going to be a short shift with either no break or assuming there is one, I'm probably going to have to work through it. If we have any revelations in the last hour or so before hammertime, I probably wont be able to act upon them and will have to vote early.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 04:25
|
|
|
Given how incredibly quiet they are and how they're not voting, do we have anything to lose in lynching bbq? Rightly or wrongly, I'm not suspicious of Bif at all.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 05:09
|
|
|
Kat Delacour posted:Considering the last Auspolformers game that is a very dangerous position. I don't necessarily think Bif is scum either but I'm still suspicious. Yeah, it was much easier to get a feel of things when I wasn't caught up in it myself. Once you're actually in the cave, your compass starts spinning, I guess.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 05:16
|
|
|
Coq says his information, if revealed will only benefit scum. I realise I am both a new player and not a great thinker but I can't think of what that information could be, nor how much of a difference it could make given that we have no real edge or leads on the scum anyways. The revealing of information, and how people react to it will move things forward, might even turn something up. If it might stop him getting lynched, it'd be worth a shot, right?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 05:44
|
|
|
SKY COQ posted:Yeah it's literally some of the same stuff Gaspy posted in his flavour text this morning. Picked too popular target last night, etc etc. I'm really sorry, but I genuinely don't understand. If it's just me who still finds this too cryptic I will absolutely drop this. I don't actually particularly suspect coq.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 05:57
|
|
|
If we eliminate coq from the lynch list, who would our next best option be? Some people are still too quiet. If they're note voting and not actually helping us with theories, we really may as well take a chance on them.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 06:50
|
|
|
Those On My Left posted:
Maybe that's what they have in mind.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 07:02
|
|
|
dj-bbq posted:I still haven't figured out the Well, I'm the only person whose vocalised any real suspicion. So it's not like you're going to be lynched. Even with that in mind, if I get nightkilled that will hardly implicate you either as no one would think someone would be foolish enough to nightkill their only detractor. Which as actually quite comforting, as that puts absolutely no value in me being killed. Between my wild theories and inexperience I'm probably more good to them alive. Honestly, I'm worried for bif and fs. I hope coq survives another night honestly. See where that goes. I have a sinking feeling I have out done myself in terms of stupid posts.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 07:56
|
|
strategy yet
|
Barbecue's behind it all!
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 08:09
|
|
|
Or combaticons, even.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 08:40
|
|
|
Reminding people that coq was the towns prime suspect when the town has an unusually high newbie count might actually be a pro-coq point.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 08:48
|
|
|
Off to work with me. No one is safe. The safe shall die. ##vote dj-bbq
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 09:58
|
|
|
Barbecue's behind it all! vote dj-bbq
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2015 04:53
|
|
|
dj-bbq posted:You tried this yesterday True. It didn't work, though. Then more died
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2015 05:03
|
|
|
I'm too dumb to know what to actually look for. But barbecue is too quiet. Now I realise they're known for this but they keep on springing up only when directly challenged and offering little in the way of insight or scumhunting. I'm not offering much either, but bbq's meant to be an experienced player. For all I know they're a roleblocker and just quiet and stoic and good at their job. I'm just not sure what else to go with.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2015 05:11
|
|
|
We've swung and missed twice with our lynching is there any one person who made compelling arguments towards both lynchings?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2015 06:36
|
|
|
Given how often people have said I'm either doing a brilliant imitation of being a hopeless newb and am actually scum OR that I'm actually the worst player ever, I actually kinda wish I was scum at this point. Fact is, I am just that bad. Now, I realise that is probably a hugely scummy thing to say. I wouldn't know.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2015 06:51
|
|
|
kinda paranoid?! That's a very munificent diagnosis! Thanks. I hope for everyone's sake that I never end up as a vigilante in one of these games. But yeah. You're bang on. I want to contribute, or even help. But I am wicked outta my depth. Still having a ball though.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2015 07:49
|
|
|
The set up against toml reminds me too much of the last two lynching we had.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2015 08:12
|
|
|
If bif and beet were scum in cahoots this would be a pretty good smokescreen.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2015 08:36
|
|
|
If they're scum I don't think they're trying to throw eachother under a bus. I think they're hoping to lead us to a confused town that votes for no one. No lynching. More night kills. It seems like an obvious thing to mention, but for people who have been useful and had good theories about multiple people. It seems weird that they haven't been killed. If they're not scum, then we may need to consider anyone they haven't suspected.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2015 08:46
|
|
|
Milky Moor posted:It's not weird that they haven't been killed. If they're suspected people who are scum, and get killed, then it becomes another argument against those suspects.. I think they've been suspicious of enough people that they're death wouldn't mark any one person. Milky Moor posted:I don't know why, but this sticks out to me like a sore thumb. In what way?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2015 08:57
|
|
|
This whole situation. ##vote Those On My Left
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2015 09:25
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 17, 2024 00:46 |
|
|
Tirade posted:
Suspecting me of scum at this point can't help your credibility.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2015 09:30
|
|