|
Neo_Reloaded posted:That is the character's logic. But the character is not a real person - this is not a documentary, this did not actually happen. So the more interesting issue is why the screenwriter/director/everyone involved created this scenario. That is what the discussion is about. Because the hero getting the girl at the end is good storytelling, and because rear end sex jokes are raunchy and unexpected in this particular context. The writers are juxtaposing conventional storytelling tropes with modern views on sex and violence. Quick, someone give me my PhD in Reading Too Much Into Straight Forward Movies Trying to Find Symbolism and Marxist-Leninist Interpretations. 
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2015 21:58
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 21:12 |
|
|
Everyone in the movie theater laughed when the lady said "i'll let you gently caress my rear end." The juxtaposition of a gentleman spy movie hero and modern views on sex and violence resulted in comedy. I don't think it can get any more obvious than that.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2015 22:57
|
|
|
Guys, this movie discriminates against handicapped people because the villain's henchman is a minority woman who was born without legs. The movie suggest that if you give the handicapped an equal role in society, they will abuse it by killing everyone using sick sword legs and kidnap world leaders for their sinister goals  Coming up next: Marxist Leninist reading of Thomas the Tank Engine
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 22:00
|
|