|
This concept intrigues and frightens me! I'm in.
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2015 23:39
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 20, 2024 02:02 |
|
|
Okay! I am ready to
|
|
#
¿
Mar 6, 2015 19:01
|
|
|
MildManeredManikin posted:plurality execution btw guys Oh! interesting. So the person who gets the most votes gets euphemized regardless of if they have majority or not? What happens if there's a tie?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 6, 2015 23:35
|
|
|
Actually question, what if there's a x-way tie for one of the roles? What happens then?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2015 00:05
|
|
|
A thought: should we publicly claim who we're passing ballots to? I can kind of envision scum getting their hands on the majority of ballots and then endlessly passing them around to themselves. Public ballot passing claims might keep that from happening.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2015 00:31
|
|
|
Meinberg posted:Scum can't pass to scum. Yes, you're right, this is in the rules and I forgot.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2015 00:33
|
|
|
Meinberg posted:##vote wall monitor lol Nah I actually did gloss over that part of the rules. And on re-reading the rules... it's looking like there's no mod confirmation on what the three powers are?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2015 00:37
|
|
|
HiipFire posted:i voted for myself, and gave the ballot to something special, i hope you'll use it more wisely than me This suggests at least one power is beneficial to the target? I don't want to have us claim which group we're in but scum probably can figure this out pretty quickly since they've got 3/4(?) people probably scattered throughout the voting groups already, so I think it'd benefit town to figure it out
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2015 00:42
|
|
|
All the tswift avatars make it hard to tell who's who.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2015 01:06
|
|
|
Okay after sleeping on it my thoughts: Ballot tracking is potentially a good idea, because town generally benefits from having more information out there Having it known who got what ballot is potentially bad, though, since scum might have powers that necessitate or work more effectively if they know who has what ballot Any information we get is still potentially suspect since scum might have powers that affect where ballots end up, or steal them, etc? And in any case scum can simply lie about where they sent ballots to and then claim interference if someone calls them on it, further muddying the waters. So given the above, I'm going to say that doing any sort of immediate claiming is not in town's best interest? But doing a D1 claim two days later on D3, when the info might be useful to town but less useful to scum (since by then it's much harder to use it to determine who has what ballot right then and there) might work out better? Thoughts?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2015 12:31
|
|
|
I had considered trying to brute force out who was scum by having everyone pass D1 ballots to the next person down on the OP roster, then pass D2 ballots to the second person down etc, and look for inconsistencies that'd indicate two people who couldn't pass ballots to each other. It falls apart if scum have any destination-altering capabilities, though
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2015 12:37
|
|
|
Ernie. posted:this is a scum post Honestly your opinion on me sounds manufactured. You disagree with my strategy, sure thing no problem. I was suggesting holding off claims till D3 because I'm paranoid about what scum can do with their knowledge, especially if we're also announcing who we passed ballots to. Saying that I'm trying to delay claims to sabotage town... I really don't see it. If true that'd be a stupidly transparent attempt at sabotage for a one day claim delay... It really sounds like you're trying to find something to draw suspicion to me for. ##vote Ernie
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2015 23:06
|
|
|
Ernie. posted:your first sentence contradicts the post i replied to. the post i replied to specifically says that we should withhold announcing the ballot abilities (it's independent of the ballot passing mechanic). there's no way the claims would have been held till d3 because everyone on d2 would have announced what ballot they held the previous day anyway. Okay this was my bad, I wasn't looking too closely at the post you were quoting and thought it was the one where I was calling for D3 claims ##unvote Sorry
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2015 23:12
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:wall monitor get a backbone I really did make a mistake, it was a couple of hours between posting and then reading Ernie's reactions to them and so I got all confused and 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2015 23:24
|
|
|
I'm mostly embarassed and unhappy right now
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2015 23:28
|
|
|
Deadline is in about 24 hours. I have an irrational hatred of no-euphemism D1's and might just hammer myself rather than let D1 go without a euphemism, if it looks like it might go that way.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2015 03:24
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:Plurality vote, there will never be a no lynch this game unless we intend it to happen. Boy I just suck at reading posts today don't I
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2015 03:29
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:wall monitor is scum; he didn't even respond to my vote on him which I didn't bothering making a case for, because he can't. His vote on Ernie was that bad, he even knew to remove it as soon as Ernie responded to it. loving hell, I've been told in the past that making a big deal about getting voted on is something only scum would do, and here I'm being told that not defending yourself is something only scum would do. Which the gently caress is it? I've said repeatedly that I messed up, that I wasn't paying as much attention as I should have and thought Ernie was quoting another one of my posts, and in that context the statements he made made me think he was scum. Once the context was changed I likewise changed my vote.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2015 03:48
|
|
|
Little Mac posted:I was just looking over wall and this post seems really townie to me. Even though he obviously means "enthusiasm," I think it's coming from a townie perspective. The vote on Ernie is bad but eh. This doesn't read like defeated scum, especially when he's only -3. No I actually do mean euphemism, it's my response to the people who're pushing to stop using the word lynch due to political correctness and inserting various euphemisms instead. So my thought was to just take the direct route and use 'euphemism' as a euphemism for lynch. So instead of saying 'let's lynch someone', I say 'let's euphemize someone' It's a stupid word-swap choice on purpose and I look forward to the day when people start using lynch again.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2015 03:56
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:Depending on context, both can be scummy. I don't even loving know anymore. I can't win with you, can I?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2015 04:02
|
|
|
Maybe I'm weird but I like the rules and strategy debates...
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2015 18:53
|
|
|
Asiina posted:gently caress it, I'm not going to spend time with a bunch of whiners who aren't even going to try because it might be hard also holy poo poo, so much ragequit here.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2015 18:55
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:I think in this sort of game with crazy rules, not being even willing to engage on setup spec is especially scummy, so I think Somber is king scum right now. Good enough for me. ##vote Somber
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2015 22:06
|
|
|
MildManeredManikin posted:As for deadline extensions, I'll gauge the thread 'a response. Do you guys think we need an extension? I think maybe an extra 12-24 hours would be nice to accomodate replacements. As the foremost voting target I am slightly biased in this situation, however.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2015 22:24
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:what does this even mean, Ernie! It's that avatar, man. I'm sorry.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2015 02:41
|
|
|
If it helps, I'm constantly getting nightkilled in all my games.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2015 02:41
|
|
|
Hmm, lemme think. (I'll vote by deadline, promise) [b]##unvote[/b[
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:30
|
|
|
##unvote
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:30
|
|
|
I still like Somber as a D1 target but gut is telling me to put some thought down first
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:34
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:Roleblocker Room Voter 4 is scum. Also won't tell us anything, but yeah, scum. Is this a read or a proof thing (ex: he slipped up and said 'I am Without revealing which room I'm in, I've got my own read on one of the voters there.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 01:25
|
|
|
Meinberg posted:##vote wall monitor Meinberg posted:My only concern with a truly open sharing of information is that it would allow scum, whatever their powers are, to be more efficient at using them. This is the entirety of Meinberg's non-jokeposting so far. Fingering me for something I think was kinda weak, then making a single statement of speculation about scumpowers. Yeah, I'm feeling good about this one. ##vote Meinberg
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 02:03
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:What is the case on Meinberg? Excessive lurking, preceded by a weak casing on me, as if he was trying to generate a target and then fly under the radar.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 02:26
|
|
|
Also reminder that you should vote tonight! Voting is important, since I'm presuming scum are voting too, and if you don't vote then you're effectively handing them a bunch of powers.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 02:31
|
|
|
Meinberg posted:Hey guys, sorry about not being around much lately. There's been a lot of conversation, and I was putting the forum largely on the backburner over the weekend. I'll try to catch up before the deadline. You've expressed one opinion so far, and that's on me. I want to hear if you'll stand by it or not.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 02:33
|
|
|
Meinberg posted:Nah, that was me making a joke vote. Okay. I'm sorry, but my opinion on you remains unchanged.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 02:35
|
|
|
Meinberg posted:This is a bad case. ah ha. ah ha ha ha ha ha. ah hah ha hah ha hah hah. AH HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA you crack me up
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 03:13
|
|
|
Either you're scum flying under the radar or you're a lurker who went two RL days without posting Either one is no real loss
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 03:14
|
|
|
Meinberg posted:Hm, not posting on the weekend on D1, yes that's sure a sign of poor moral character. true town is glued to their keyboards 24/7 on that note I'm going to bed, night all, vote meinberg
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 03:17
|
|
|
I was in the cop room yesterday. I did not get to do the cop action. (which is probably for the best since I think at least one person voted for me  )
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 11:01
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 20, 2024 02:02 |
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:I fell asleep early last night. I was #3 in the cop room yesterday, and Wall Monitor is town. On one hand, yay. On the other hand, this is probably going to continue my endless streak of getting killed N2.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 11:15
|
|